About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Hughes on Catastrophic Risks in the Boston Globe

Goertzel on “OpenCog Prime: Design for an Open-Source Thinking Machine”

The Hate Party

9th World Congress of Bioethics

Emergence - IEET News for Sept 2, 2008

comments

Steven Earl Salmony on 'Making the Visible Invisible' (2008 09 06)

Magne Karlsen on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 06)

Lori on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 05)

Josh on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 09 04)

Will on 'Poll: Who will the next US President be? (Obama)' (2008 09 04)




ieet forums

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (2)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

Jimmy_Adams: Intergenerational Behaviours (1)



"Argue for your limitations and sure enough they're yours."
Richard Bach





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Security > SciTech

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


80% of Americans know nothing of nano; 90% have views on whether its good or risky

The Situationist



Posted: Apr 5, 2007

Emotions, Values, and Information: The Future of Nanotechnology By Dan Kahan: “A national study of nanotechnology risk perceptions. We discovered that although 80% of our subjects reported having heard “little” or “nothing” about nanotechnology, 90% of them (without being supplied any additional information) still had a view one way or the other on whether it was on net risky or beneficial…

Egalitarians and communitarians...tend to be sensitive to claims of environmental and technological risks because abating such dangers justifies regulating commercial activities that generate inequality and legitimize unconstrained pursuit of self-interest. Individualists, in contrast, tend to be skeptical about such risks, in line with their concern to ward off contraction of the sphere of individual initiative. So do hierarchists, who tend to see assertions of environmental technological risks as challenging the competence of governmental and social elites....

In our “no information” condition, hierarchists and egalitarians, individualists and communitarians all had roughly comparable perceptions of nanotechnology risks. However, in the “information exposure” condition, subjects adopted toward nanotechnology the clashing positions persons with their respective worldviews take on environmental risks generally.”

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: NASA develops lab-on-a-chip

Previous entry: Genetic basis for religiosity and niceness discovered in twin studies

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376