Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion

Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014

Transhumanism: A Glimpse into the Future of Humanity

Brain, Mind, and the Structure of Reality

How America’s Obsession With Bad Birth Control Hurts and Even Kills Women

A decade of uncertainty in nanoscale science and engineering


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

instamatic on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 21, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 21, 2014)

instamatic on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 20, 2014)

instamatic on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 20, 2014)

Michael Nuschke on 'What is Technoprogressivism?' (Nov 19, 2014)

@andy00778 on 'Does Religion Cause More Harm than Good? Brits Say Yes. Here’s Why They May be Right.' (Nov 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Why Running Simulations May Mean the End is Near
Nov 3, 2014
(20430) Hits
(13) Comments

Does Religion Cause More Harm than Good? Brits Say Yes. Here’s Why They May be Right.
Nov 18, 2014
(18976) Hits
(1) Comments

2040’s America will be like 1840’s Britain, with robots?
Oct 26, 2014
(14492) Hits
(33) Comments

Decentralized Money: Bitcoin 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0
Nov 10, 2014
(8531) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Vision > Galactic

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2778) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


NASA Announces Design For New Deep Space Exploration System



NASA

Space Videos

Posted: Feb 22, 2012


NASA Administrator Charles Bolden speaking at a Sept. 14, 2011 news conference, announcing the selected design of a new Space Launch System.

The new heavy-lift rocket will take the agency’s astronauts farther into space than ever before, create high-quality jobs here at home, and provide the cornerstone for America’s future human space exploration efforts. The booster will launch humans to places no one has gone before.


Listen/View


Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2779) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Overkill.

The SLS is a launcher with no specific missions or set of missions either selected or funded for it. Uses much of the technological and support heritage that made the Shuttle too expensive to continue operating (what, you thought it was only about the orbiter?), would be manufactured and flown too infrequently (NASA will be the only customer) to enjoy economies of scale, or keep support personnel (who must be paid, no matter how little it flies) proficient. We don't need a heavy-lift launcher now or in the near future, nor would this be the best choice if we did.

Existing EELV (Atlas and Delta) and Falcon launchers (or upgrades of them) plus orbital assembly and refueling will be adequate for anything we may want to do in the near future, launchers already manufactured for an existing customer base (which ULA will be more than happy to ramp up), of which NASA can be a part.

Viable, affordable alternatives can be seen here:

http://www.ulalaunch.com/site/docs/publications/AffordableExplorationArchitecture2009.pdf

Some question the need for the Orion capsule as well, but I can live with that, given the understanding that it will go to low Earth orbit on the Delta IV, which is adequate to fly it. Want to go beyond to geostationary orbit, Earth-Moon Lagrange points, or Lunar orbit? Then use either a refuelable upper stage, or dock it with a separately launched transfer stage, an enhanced version of what was done in the 1960's with Gemini-Agena, once going as far as 850 miles from Earth, a record that stood until Apollo 8...




YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: ‪Genetic Engineering Animation‬

Previous entry: A New Era of Space Exploration

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376