Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Are We Passing Through a Bottleneck, or Will the Explosion of Existential Risks Continue?

Everyone loves a genetically modified mosquito – right?

Are We Ready for Designer Babies?

The End of Religion: Technology and the Future

Multifunctional fibers communicate with the brain

The Power of Pull


ieet books

How “God” Works: A Logical Inquiry on Faith
Author
Marshall Brain


comments

CygnusX1 on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 25, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

jasoncstone on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

SharZ on 'Problems with Defining an Existential Risk' (Jan 24, 2015)

Lincoln Cannon on 'The End of Religion: Technology and the Future' (Jan 24, 2015)

philosophytorres on 'Problems with Defining an Existential Risk' (Jan 23, 2015)

Knotanumber on 'Religion’s Dirty Dozen—12 Really Bad Religious Ideas That Have Made the World Worse' (Jan 23, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Bad luck and cancer – did the media get it wrong?
Jan 3, 2015
(18209) Hits
(4) Comments

#8: Future of love and sex: monogamy no longer the default, say experts
Dec 28, 2014
(11570) Hits
(0) Comments

#9: Creating sentient machines with ‘deep learning’ AI technology
Dec 28, 2014
(8958) Hits
(0) Comments

#6: Living for 1,000 years: an ‘out of this world’ future awaits us
Dec 30, 2014
(8503) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Life > Vision > Futurism > Contributors > John Niman

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (6997) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality and their impact on the law.


John Niman
By John Niman
boydfuturist

Posted: Dec 29, 2012

Watson showed, in dramatic form, the capabilities of current computers when it (he?) defeated the two best Jeopardy!.....

Players in the world almost two years ago. If Kurzweil’s law of accelerating returns holds, Watson ought to be about twice as efficient as it was then. Further, while the Jeopardy! win was impressive, what happened behind the scenes was more impressive.  Watson learned, by reading natural language texts, how to find the answer to a Jeopardy! questions in but a few seconds.

 

 

Lawyers, also, use natural language documents to figure out the answers to questions. Just as Watson is being taught to answer questions in the medical and financial contexts, it seems that Watson could likewise help lawyers in the legal context. By scouring cases (helpfully in electronic form already) Watson ought to be able to learn legal theory and discern precedent much as lawyers do already.

When Watson is combined with other software, a truly comprehensive legal system begins to emerge. Lawyers find facts through a process called “discovery.” Among other things, discovery involves asking questions of witnesses, searching through computer systems and hard-copy file systems, and gathering expert opinions. Already e-discovery software exists that can help automate some of this process. Additionally, Watson could record client interviews and distill facts from the recordings. With access to the facts and the legal precedent, Watson could draft a brief through currently existing article writing software. With additional software, Watson can also help with negotiations.

Yet, despite Watson’s capabilities, there are some things for which an A.I. just isn’t suitable. While clients might not balk at a computer listening in to their interview, most are going to want to tell a real human being their troubles. That is – clients are unlikely to want to talk with a computer when seeking legal advice. Yet, it remains true that computers (including Watson, and the internet more generally) greatly assist attorneys, and that they could be of great benefit in these situations.

 

The answer to this dilemma lies in augmented reality. Through wearable computing like Google Glass, networked A.I. systems like Watson can continue to provide information to attorneys even when those attorneys must put in face-time with clients and others. The union of artificial intelligence and augmented reality makes portable the case-searching capabilities of the artificial intelligence and allows the A.I. to access areas otherwise off-limits to computers. Imagine a lawyer able to bring up a line of precedent in court without having to remember it off the top of his or her head.

Other software programs are able to detect emotion and lies. By combining these programs with A.I. and augmented reality, attorneys interviewing witnesses or the opposition can get a better read on when they are being deceived. The same combination can make an attorney more charming by feeding the attorney facts about the person he or she is talking to, and by detecting the subjects current emotional state and offering hints about how the attorney can bring the subject into a desired emotional state.

 

The interweaving of computers and professionals is well on its way, and there is little reason to think that the legal field will remain untouched. Attorneys who embrace technology are likely to have an advantage at first, and will remain competitive as more attorneys embrace technology. Eventually, it may be necessary to person one’s job.


John Niman is an Affiliate Scholar, a J.D. Candidate at the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. His primary legal interests include bioethics and personhood. He blogs about emerging technology and transhumanism at http://boydfuturist.wordpress.com.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (6998) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


“Watson showed, in dramatic form, the capabilities of current computers when it (he?) defeated the two best Jeopardy!.....”
I think you mean “He.”

A machine lawyer privy to the most intimate details of your legal case hooked up to the internet in the age of rampant security breaches? What could go wrong?





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: #3 Ethics without Philosophers (the Appalling State of Affairs in Business)

Previous entry: Who is around you in a coffee shop? Do you somehow know them? Find out with the app Sonar

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376