Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Convergent Risk, Social Futurism, and the Wave of Change (Part 2 of 2)

Beauty Is Skin-deep—But That’s Where Genetic Engineering Is Going Next

Convergent Risk, Social Futurism, and the Wave of Change (Part 1 of 2)

American Society for Engineering Education: Why Diversity is so Important

Why there is no mind/body problem

Why Solitary Confinement Is The Worst Kind Of Psychological Torture


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

CygnusX1 on 'The Problem with the Trolley Problem, or why I avoid utilitarians near subways' (Jul 28, 2014)

instamatic on 'Beauty Is Skin-deep—But That’s Where Genetic Engineering Is Going Next' (Jul 27, 2014)

instamatic on 'Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!' (Jul 27, 2014)

contraterrine on 'Radcliffe-Richards on Sexual Inequality and Justice (Part Two)' (Jul 27, 2014)

contraterrine on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 27, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'The Problem with the Trolley Problem, or why I avoid utilitarians near subways' (Jul 27, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'How do you explain consciousness?' (Jul 27, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Nanomedical Cognitive Enhancement
Jul 11, 2014
(5964) Hits
(0) Comments

Interview with Transhumanist Biohacker Rich Lee
Jul 8, 2014
(5764) Hits
(0) Comments

Virtually Sacred, by Robert Geraci – religion in World of Warcraft and Second Life
Jul 3, 2014
(4412) Hits
(0) Comments

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
Jul 5, 2014
(3674) Hits
(18) Comments



IEET > Life > Vision > Futurism > Contributors > Dick Pelletier

Print Email permalink (6) Comments (3087) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Are we alone? Probably not, but are we looking in the right place?


Dick Pelletier
Dick Pelletier
Ethical Technology

Posted: Feb 18, 2013

Are we the lone sentient life in the universe? So far, we have no evidence to the contrary, and yet the odds suggest that this is highly improbable. There are an estimated 250 billion stars in the Milky Way and 70 sextillion in the visible universe, many, with multiple planets swirling around.

It seems impossible that only one planet has produced intelligent life. However, if other intelligent life forms exist, where are they? Given the age of the universe, and its vast number of stars, if planets like Earth are at all typical, then there should be thousands or millions of advanced ETs out there.

Forward thinkers believe the reasons for our inability to discover ETs could fall into three areas. A) We are the first intelligent beings capable of making our presence known and leaving our planet; B) other advanced civilizations exist, but they are undetectable by our technologies, and C) there have been others, but they all ran into a cosmic roadblock that destroyed them.

Of these choices, this writer sees B as the most probable. They could be roaming through the universe in huge numbers, but living their lives in a digital dimension, invisible to our eyes.

It is highly likely that our digital technologies; movies, TV, and Internet data, along with tomorrow’s nanotech-enhanced virtual reality systems could, at a future time, encourage humans to live a portion of their lives in a virtual reality digital dimension – a kind of Holodeck environment.

This trend could expand to the point where most humans would eventually prefer living a digital life permanently, without need for physical bodies. In fact, in this virtual wonderworld, there would be no requirement for matter of any kind. In an all digital existence, we would not even need a planet to hang our hat on.

If other advanced civilizations have taken this road, they could be out there, but undetectable by our technologies. However, as the future advances through the next two-to-three centuries, we might discover a cosmos filled with digital civilizations just waiting to welcome us into ‘The Federation’.

Could humanity one day adopt a digital dimension lifestyle without need for physical bodies, or any type of matter?

Stay tuned; this sci-fi-like scenario could become our future in the centuries ahead.


Dick Pelletier is a weekly columnist who writes about future science and technologies for numerous publications. He's also appeared on various TV shows, and he blogs at Immortaltech.
Print Email permalink (6) Comments (3088) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


John Smart’s STEM compression hypothesis strikes me as most plausible.





A possible reason why intelligent life has not discovered us is this: interstellar/intergalactic travel within a reasonable amount of time is impossible. With the immense void separating our solar system from potential planets in our local neighborhood and beyond, maybe superluminal travel or travel close to the speed of light is a universal road block. Thus, we are isolated in our own remote parts of the universe. I truly hope that this is not the case, but its something to take into consideration.





Virtual reality and a digital world is possible and probably likely however this does not explain every civilization.  It only takes one to not choose that path.  The number of civilizations would have an effect too.  They could also submerge in the digital world and explore the Universe.  A species to reach civilization status, you would think would have evolutionary history of curiosity and exploration. 

As David Brin has said perhaps they are all water worlds with sea life or science and democracy is rare. I’ll try to rephrase what he said. One of the possible answers to the fermi paradox is most civilizations have the same darwinian dynamic as us: top down Oligarchy, hyper conservative and repress scientific advancement. This is the standard human situation throughout most of history.  The enlightenment to now is a short time of history and there is no guarantee we will retain this type of society of science and democracy.  (history and progress is not linear) We may be the exception to build star ships if we choose too. What a responsibility.

Both of the ideas are highly possible. I really like the Darwinian dynamic answer.  They too will have an evolutionary history and perhaps they are all just roaming around their planet like us, with some having low-planet orbit stations and satellites.

Hopefully they are on their way. It just seems if advanced civilizations are common and long lived, we would have seen some evidence of just one. Maybe there is only one advanced civilization per galaxy. Who knows. There are so many explanations and theories that have merit. It is an important question. Actually it’s the most important question of all. It can provide insight into our future and if we are truly alone, all the more responsibility to be a multi-planetary transhuman species. Spread life throughout the Universe should be ultimate goal.

http://www.biocosm.org/  is another interesting theory.





Forget speed-of-light barriers. In an all digital life, instant appearance anywhere in our universe, or to other universes may be possible.

We would only be limited by our imagination; and with tomorrow’s artificial inteleligence to kick off this science fiction-like era, our thoughts could get wild.





I suspect that the real polysapient party is happening in hyperspace, with a de facto “you must be this intelligent” sign posted to get in. Why would they want to contact such an insufferably primitive and stupid species as us, in our current state? We have nothing we could offer them, and it’s probably unethical for them to tamper with us in our current state anyway. For them to intervene would be to taint us with their influence and thus deprive the multiverse of the unique perspective we would have provided had we been allowed to develop on our own terms, such provision being the ultimate purpose of our existence.





Many physicists believe that we live in a ‘quantum’ multiverse, where events such as, simultaneous existence in multiple locations, wormholes that connect vast regions of our cosmos, traveling through time, and hooking up to other universes; all seem very possible.

In this ‘magic-like’ realm, the chances of our living a digital existence without need for matter of any kind seems like a distinct possibility to this positive futurist.

Will humanity’s future unfold in this weird, radical way? Time will tell.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Iceland’s Illiberal Agenda

Previous entry: Polyamory – an Anti-Scarcity Relationship Model for the Future

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376