Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Chalmers vs Pigliucci on the Philosophy of Mind-Uploading (2): Pigliucci’s Pessimism

Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century”

10 Horrifying Technologies That Should Never Be Allowed To Exist

Popular Science picks best inventions for 2014

Data Mining: Twitter, Facebook and Beyond

Access for Everyone: A Model for Free Online Learning, with Duolingo’s Luis von Ahn


ieet books

A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century
Author
Ilia Stambler


comments

Peter Wicks on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 20, 2014)

Kris Notaro on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 20, 2014)

Kris Notaro on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 19, 2014)

brkelly on 'Why and How Should We Build a Basic Income for Every Citizen?' (Sep 19, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)
Aug 29, 2014
(5212) Hits
(1) Comments

Why and How Should We Build a Basic Income for Every Citizen?
Sep 16, 2014
(4824) Hits
(4) Comments

An open source future for synthetic biology
Sep 9, 2014
(4422) Hits
(0) Comments

MMR Vaccines and Autism: Bringing clarity to the CDC Whistleblower Story
Sep 14, 2014
(4217) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Rights > PostGender > Vision > Bioculture

Print Email permalink (7) Comments (4268) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


How can we inspire young women to pursue careers in science?



Annabelle Pratt

Curiosity

Posted: Sep 14, 2011

Annabelle Pratt, Senior Power Research Engineer at Intel Labs, reveals how she believes we can inspire young women to pursue careers in science in this Discovery Channel video.


Listen/View


Print Email permalink (7) Comments (4269) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Getting a woman POTUS elected might help, even if she might turn out to be Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin. Neither of them appear to be Luddites.
The Heartland is more 'conservative' (old fashioned) than one might think it is so we might have to compromise our principles in gaining a female president/veep (politics are anachronistic yet we are stuck with it for the duration. It is called the Politics of Nostalgia; one reason for it is not difficult to comprehend: people are sentimental for a time in which they were younger).



Getting young women excited and involved with science and technology is easy - Just get them involved with a FIRST Robotics team - at the Lego League level in elementary and middle school, and the full Robotics Competition in high school.

There are thousands of examples of women who got excited by FIRST Robotics and ended up in engineering careers, and dozens of teams that are all girls. The Girl Scouts and 4H have even become involved in FIRST.

Getting a woman President won't do 1/2 as much as spending time mentoring young women and showing them that an engineering career path is both exciting and possible. And if we have to have that woman president be Bachmann or Palin, someone save us. Bachmann is a creation "science" advocate. Yet you say she's not a luddite? Please.



"Getting a woman President won't do 1/2 as much"

Even if getting a woman president does 1/4, then so be it.



I have to ask the obvious, politically incorrect question:

Why?

Economists emphasize that society tends to benefit when people organically segregate and specialize in the roles which best suit them in current circumstances. It produces less optimal outcomes when we try to force people into roles against their inclinations, based on ideological considerations instead of an understanding of human nature. Even if some women have the goods to work in the STEM fields, a lot of them don't want to, and I respect that fact. You might as well make it a political goal to encourage more gays and lesbians to become heterosexual based your religious beliefs about human sexuality.



"Economists emphasize"

Place a group of economists in a room and what do you get:
disagreement.
Economics is no science.



I think the answer is the same regardless of what specifically we are trying to inspire women to do:

Empower them to do it. Equalize pay in those fields. Make it accessible. Make it socially acceptable.

But how? Maybe we merely need to promote the idea of women as bread winners, men as domestic partners. Then, perhaps, women would simply fill whatever niche were available, as men did before.

I don't know. In America, I think it's going to get darker before it get's lighter. I'd like to believe otherwise, but I don't think people here suffer enough yet to really get angry enough to demand change in any of our institutions. I wish it were otherwise.



"In America, I think it's going to get darker before it get's lighter."

Agreed.
To answer a previous comment by Lee, merely because Palin and Bachmann are old-fashioned, doesn't mean they are luddites; Creationism, as one might add, is just a tradition, a game in certain religionist red state areas. Palin and Bachmann have plenty of gadgets, they are not treehuggers living in the forest; they are not anti-tech. When it comes to DARPA they are not at all luddites. They are cornballs, not luddites.
I don't necessarily want to vote for them, however they are controlled by men, they have to go along to get along. What could they do about it at this time if they were inclined to do anything to begin with? Not much.



YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Why the October 6th D.C. Freedom Plaza Protest is Important to Technoprogressivism

Previous entry: Transhumanism and Neurophilosophy

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376