IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


The New Renaissance

Hayles shadowboxes with transhumanism

Singular Sensations

The Chemistry of Love

Human-racism and biopolitics in SF

Recent Comments


Dan Kelly on 'On the moral status of humanized chimeras and the concept of human dignity' (2008 07 06)

Cynthia on 'Buddhism, H+ and the Myth of the Authentic Self' (2008 07 05)

Roko on 'Singularities Enough, and Time' (2008 07 03)

Michalis on 'Getting Paid in Our Jobless Future' (2008 07 03)

director on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)




IEET Fora




"Twenty years from now, you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones that you did. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
Mark Twain



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Rights > Disability > Life > Enablement > Implants > Fellows > Wrye Sententia

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Prosthetic Perception: Turn on, Tune in, Tune Out (and then hit Replay)


Wrye Sententia

Wrye Sententia


Journal of Evolution and Technology


Posted: Feb 1, 2006

Review of Michael Chorost’s Rebuilt:  How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human (2005)

Michael Chorost’s story is like no other today and his book is as riveting as it is timely. Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human is an intimate depiction of important aspects of some of today’s most pressing controversies in emerging health science technology concerned with improving the human capabilities. Told from the vantage point of a self-reflective Cochlear-implant patient who is a keenly perceptive writer, Rebuilt is a pivotal tale from inside a period of rapid and consequential techno-social transition.  Medical interventions to replace failing body parts—whether a heart pacemaker, a pig liver, or a metal hip—are becoming increasingly routine in technologically advanced societies, and prosthetics for virtually any therapeutic need are generally accepted without objection from patients or society. Yet, the adaptive neural hardware technologies like Chorost’s brain implant, or more pandemically, “software” psychopharmaceuticals and other drugs affecting cognition, tend to provoke more controversy than other medical technologies because they bring into play long-cherished assumptions about our ‘humanness’ as thinking, emotive, and perceptual beings. When it comes to perceiving, or knowing what it means to be human, we are inevitably caught in an organ tautology: its the human brain that counts. 

Aside from conceptual mavericks like Stelarc or Ken Warwick, it is unlikely that anyone will soon seek (or be allowed!) non-therapeutic brain implants.  It’s too soon to line up for elective brain surgery, which is why it’s so valuable to have a perceptive and articulate writer like Chorost shouting back to us from the epicenter of this technocultural storm. As therapeutic techniques become increasingly capable of changing and extending the human body and brain through drugs, prosthetics, and other technical means, views on such viscerally lived societal changes are nearly always divided. Add in, a dash of distain or morality for good measure and you’ve got the predictable antagonism of a debate between a George Annas v. Greg Stock. The use of the past-tense in the subtitle to Rebuilt (How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human) clues the reader in advance that Chorost, for one, has weathered the looming social debates over what it is or isn’t to be human in relation to radically transformative technologies.

Chorost is, through his own astute observations in an economy of signs and surgeries, an important guide to this next wave. While other stories about cyborgs abound, Chorost’s narrative is the first nonfiction autobiography of a perceptual cyborg—someone whose senses are transformed by technology directly wired, or rather wirelessly transmitted, to his brain. And yet, Chorost is not just another prop in a Wired fantasy of techno-fetishistic, commercialized masculinity. Chorost describes in detail the fragility of his technological self—and the precarious humanity at risk. In this book, Chorost hears past the cultural static of essentialized versions of what it means to be human in a way that Donna Haraway proclaimed a theorized and fabricated hybrid mind might: “The cyborg is resolutely committed to partiality, irony, intimacy, and perversity”[1]. Yet Chorost, because his life is not just a theoretical manifesto in syncretic understanding, describes his ambivalence, shares his losses, and recounts his pain in the way that organic humans do. In doing so, always with a bit of self-reflective humor, he cautions consumer-patients eager to embrace body modifications with human-computer technological interfaces. He deftly addresses the good, the bad, and the awkward in getting to know and use his own advanced hearing apparatus without mincing the frustrations of compromise as he strains for an approximation of ‘normalcy’ in hitting his head against the ceiling of current technological limitations.

What might we face individually and collectively when our eyes, ears, and sense of smell are re-engineered on the operating table? With convincing authority, Chorost assesses the pros and cons of such interventions in perceptual human faculties not only for himself, but also for society. He critically analyzes some of the impending societal consequences. For instance, he explains the nested issues for minority groups whose freedom of choice and identity may be threatened by the ability (or pressure) to “fix” their disabilities.  He also assesses the situated economics of corporate-driven medicine as consumers’ sensory choices become mediated by hard/software design decisions: what does it mean to ‘see’ ‘hear’ smell’ or ‘taste’ through a particular company’s execution of corporate-ratified product capabilities?

Rebuilt hits the pause button on the accelerated pace of innovation and marks an important moment in the transition of society towards human enhancement technologies. Will these lead to greater freedom in human expression and understanding?  In heeding Chorost’s cautionary tale as both a warning and a celebration of next steps in culture, readers will hear a timeless and visionary assessment of the human condition; a valuable gift that good writers and timely thinkers share with their contemporaries and provide as their own legacy.  Twentieth-century author, Aldous Huxley (aside from crafting his over-cited dystopian novel about a brave new world) lamented the more subtle limitations of human thinking caused by truncated, limited perception.  Huxley and his wife, Laura Archer-Huxley, sought and promoted ways to open the  “reducing valve” of consciousness—those calcified perceptual filters that all too often allow us to select and ignore, even as we see, hear, touch, taste, and live.

Chorost’s careful testimony of early twenty-first century growing pains is invaluable for those activists, researchers, and thinkers concerned with human rights and emerging prosthetic technologies. Rebuilt is an explicit manual on human self-awareness during a time of massive technological transition and extreme vulnerability. If enhancement technologies are to become routinely hard-wired under the skin as readily as antidepressants, stimulants, and other perceptual drugs are prescribed or taken for better lives, listening to Chorost makes sense.

[1] Haraway, D. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century," in Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, 149-181. New York: Routledge.



Wrye Sententia is a fellow of the IEET, and director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics (CCLE), a nonprofit research, policy, and public education center working to advance and protect freedom of thought into the 21st century.

permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Aubrey Interview for CBC Canada Now

Previous entry: Illegal Possession Of Your Own Brain

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376