Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project





Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Obama, culture and Magick

Andy Profiled in The Scotsman

Helen Jaques reviews Nature debate on H+ featuring Miah, de Grey and Warwick

Russell about to publish Voices of Disbelief

Aspergers as Gift

comments

Dana on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 12 03)

Ruth on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 12 02)

darshana bihani on 'Don’t Change Your “Self” - Change the World' (2008 12 02)

vog on 'Religion and Transhumanism pt1' (2008 12 01)

Patrick on 'Maximizing Change Effectiveness' (2008 12 01)




ieet forums

Sam G: Transhumanism (5)

jake: Irresitible (1)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)



"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Life > Vision > Futurism

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


U.S. Social Security demographers offer woo futurism

U.S. Social Security Trustees



Posted: Apr 29, 2007

Every year a half dozen demographers and economists project the solvency of the US Medicare (senior healthcare) and Social Security (old age income support) systems for the next 75 years. The reports are fascinating because even with the parameters of their optimistic, modal and pessimistic scenarios you have wildly different outcomes, from the collapse of the welfare state to financial stability. When you start tweaking the parameters the way we at the IEET would like to it gets even more interesting. (Summary)

Their projection of the average life expectancy at of an American *born in 2081*, for instance, is between their pessimistic “high-cost” estimate of 90 years (girls) and their optimistic “low-cost” estimate of 79 years (boys). Their estimates for people who are 65 years old in 2081 (and therefore haven’t even been born yet) is 83-91 total years (18-26 additional years at age 65 in 2081).

When you factor in their linear projections on immigration (ignoring climate change population displacement for instance), birth rates, the retirement age, employment, taxation, wealth, and so on its pretty amazing that they aren’t embarrassed to repeat this exercise every year. (IHT article on the report)

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Should bioweapon info be censored from the science press

Previous entry: Poll: Should future violent criminals be offered brain-changing therapies?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376