IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


The New Renaissance

Hayles shadowboxes with transhumanism

Singular Sensations

The Chemistry of Love

Human-racism and biopolitics in SF

Recent Comments


Dan Kelly on 'On the moral status of humanized chimeras and the concept of human dignity' (2008 07 06)

Cynthia on 'Buddhism, H+ and the Myth of the Authentic Self' (2008 07 05)

Roko on 'Singularities Enough, and Time' (2008 07 03)

Michalis on 'Getting Paid in Our Jobless Future' (2008 07 03)

director on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)




IEET Fora




"We should all be concerned about the future because we will have to spend the rest of our lives there."
Charles Kettering (1876-1958) Engineer and Inventor



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Vision > Fellows > Mike Treder

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Adapting to abundance


Mike Treder

Mike Treder


Responsible Nanotechnology


Posted: Sep 8, 2006

To a large extent, societies and cultures are shaped by economics. If there’s just barely enough to go around, the culture may be suspicious and develop superstitions about the “evil eye” (the jealousy of neighbors). This makes sense in a non-innovative, zero-sum context, when one family’s good fortune means slightly more poverty for everyone else in the village. On the other hand, in wealthy societies, people can be quite generous and inclusive. Or, alternately, newly-rich leaders can use newfound wealth and power vulgarly or even cruelly.

The Industrial Revolution made people more economically valuable. Working in factories, people could make several times as many goods as they could use. The increased economic value of people may have been reflected in the values of the Enlightenment--may even have supported the Enlightenment.

Today, people in industrialized nations are becoming less valuable again. A combination of automation and globalization have reduced the need for factory workers, and made many people turn to “service” jobs that only redistribute wealth rather than producing it. Will Enlightenment values fade? It may depend not only on economics, but on culture.

People from different cultures respond differently to the same incentives. In an Aug. 13 essay in the New York Times, “The Culture of Nations,” David Brooks points out that, although no diplomat pays for parking tickets, diplomats from some countries--Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Japan, Israel, and Canada--never get them. Meanwhile, Kuwaiti diplomats picked up an average of 246 tickets apiece between 1997 and 2002. Egypt, Sudan, Mozambique, Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Syria were also mentioned as major scofflaws.

The lesson here seems to be that culture matters. It would be nice to design solutions to molecular manufacturing’s challenges based only on fundamental economic analysis. The lesson of the parking tickets is that this won’t work. Some cultures may deal well with abundance, finding ways to enrich most of their members while continuing to be good global citizens. Others may react badly to the exact same stimuli.

In the second half of the column, Brooks describes the observations of a veteran foreign aid worker, Lawrence E. Harrison. It seems that “cultural change is measured in centuries, not decades.”

We don’t have centuries; we may not even have decades.


Mike Treder is a fellow of the IEET, and the Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, an organization working to raise awareness of the issues presented by advanced nanotechnology.

permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Pursuing the Longevity Dividend : Scientific Goals for an Aging World

Previous entry: Designing Children

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376