Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Ayesha Khanna interviewed by NY Times

David Brin’s EXISTENCE: Official Trailer

How to Talk to an Alien

Religion, Witch Hunts, Homophobia and Human Rights in Africa

At-Home HIV Test Raises Ethical Questions

‪Human Trafficking of Sex Workers‬

Sex Work – Demeaning Practice or Basic Human Right?

Yes, I Am a Believer

Bostrom & Cascio @ Astana Economic Forum

We Are Borg


ieet books

Manna: Two Visions of Humanity’s Future
Author
by Marshall Brain

The Astrobiological Landscape: Philosophical Foundations of the Study of Cosmic Life
by Milan M. Ćirković

Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People: An Interesting and Amusing Guide to Bioethics
by Arthur Caplan

From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

Intomorrow on 'Yes, I Am a Believer' (May 24, 2012)

Stefan Pernar on 'Why Humanists Need to Make the Shift to Post-Atheism' (May 24, 2012)

Pastor_Alex on 'Yes, I Am a Believer' (May 24, 2012)

Stefan Pernar on 'Yes, I Am a Believer' (May 24, 2012)

Pastor_Alex on 'Yes, I Am a Believer' (May 24, 2012)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


IEET > Security > Cyber > Fellows > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (1679) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


Building Humanoid Robots


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Responsible Nanotechnology

Posted: Feb 21, 2007

Robots with feelings [will be available] in just 10 years, scientists predicted yesterday. They now claim it is essential to give robots their own emotions if they are to be capable of running independently and efficiently enough to take on a variety of domestic tasks.

More from a fascinating article in the Telegraph (UK):

At present, commercially available robots such as automatic vacuum cleaners are little more than drones capable of carrying out only one task. However, speaking at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Francisco yesterday, a panel of robotics experts said robots capable of multiple domestic tasks, that can also provide companionship for their owners, will be available within 10 years. And the scientists claim it is already possible to give robots such “feelings”.

A number of groups around the world are now developing robots that have basic emotions in a bid to motivate the machines.

If a robot feels happy after it has cleaned a dirty carpet particularly well, then it will apparently seek out more dirt to do the same. Similarly, if the robot feels guilt or sadness at having failed at a task, it will try harder next time.

“Emotion plays an important role in guiding attention towards what is important and away from distractions,” said Professor Cynthia Breazeal, one of the world’s leading roboticists based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It allows the robot to make better decisions, learn more effectively and interact more appropriately.”

How much might be possible with humanoid robots? How close can we get to androids—such as those envisioned by Isaac Asimov—who are virtually indistinguishable from us?

Whatever is achieved, it will take many more small steps. Perhaps, however, a “grand challenge” can accelerate that progress.

This is from a special report in The Daily Yomiuri (Japan):

At times, it may seem as if technology is moving ahead at breakneck speed. But in reality, most technological and scientific innovation saunters forward in a stepwise fashion, building on past success and carefully hedged against serious risk.

Grand challenges are different. By design, grand challenges are dreamed up to push the envelope, to break through barriers, and to ignore limits. Think of projects such as putting a man on the moon or mapping the human genome and you get the idea.

Grand challenges have become a favorite paradigm-shifting mechanism in many scientific and engineering disciplines ranging from mathematics and biology to psychology and astrophysics.

Typically what they all have in common is a blend of imagination and wonder—a sense that something heretofore thought impossible might just be within reach.

In 2002, a group of British researchers set about defining a series of grand challenges. One of those they focused on is to create “a succession of increasingly sophisticated working robots.”

In the true spirit of a grand challenge, the Architecture of Brain & Mind project aims to bring these three disciplines together in a single demonstrable system. Along the way, researchers will have to solve a range of rather thorny problems related to natural intelligence, perception, reasoning, learning, and problem solving.

At first glance, these seem like the standard set of AI problems. However, the project distinguishes itself by including even less understood human capabilities such as curiosity, creativity, and the ability for the system to not only know what it is doing, but also the reasons for its actions (at least in some cases).

One sign of success would be a robot capable of functioning at the level of a 2- to 5-year-old child, which is no small task. Another milestone could be a robot capable of autonomously helping a disabled person around a house without explicit pre-programming about its environment. Either result would be an outstanding achievement by today’s standards.

We, and others, are using a phrase (attributed to Stephen Hawking) so often now that it is beginning to seem trite, and yet never has it been more true: Today’s science fiction is often tomorrow’s science fact.

Nearly all of us living today will witness many things “heretofore thought impossible,” including, perhaps, androids that are eerily close to humans. Other wonders could include radically extended healthy human lifespans, robust artificial intelligence, and, of course, desktop molecular manufacturing.

That last one is most likely to arrive earliest. We expect that the world will have to deal with the transformative and disruptive consequences of advanced nanotechnology no later than 2020, and quite possibly several years sooner.

(Hat tip: KurzweilAI.net)


Mike Treder is a former Managing Director of the IEET.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (1680) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Michael Sandel's Contribution to the Burgeoning Bioconservative Canon

Previous entry: Release the Robot Monkeys

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376