Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Enhancing Virtues: Intelligence (Part 3): Pharmaceutical Cognitive Enhancement

Actually: You ARE the Customer, Not the Product

A message about the power of free expression

Cascio, Pellissier @ Artificial Intelligence & The Singularity Conference

Secrets of the Mind: Can Science Explain Consciousness? (34 min)

Hughes, Walker @ Basic Income Reddit AMA (1pm EDT)


ieet books

A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century
Author
Ilia Stambler


comments

Peter Wicks on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 20, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 20, 2014)

Kris Notaro on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 20, 2014)

Kris Notaro on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 19, 2014)

instamatic on 'Is Anarchy (as in Anarchism) the Golden Mean of the future?' (Sep 19, 2014)

brkelly on 'Why and How Should We Build a Basic Income for Every Citizen?' (Sep 19, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Review of Ilia Stambler’s “A History of Life-Extensionism in the Twentieth Century"' (Sep 19, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Why and How Should We Build a Basic Income for Every Citizen?
Sep 16, 2014
(6153) Hits
(4) Comments

Enhancing Virtues: Caring (part 1)
Aug 29, 2014
(5221) Hits
(1) Comments

An open source future for synthetic biology
Sep 9, 2014
(4453) Hits
(0) Comments

MMR Vaccines and Autism: Bringing clarity to the CDC Whistleblower Story
Sep 14, 2014
(4242) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Security > Military > Fellows > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (3) Comments (5117) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


On the Future of Warfare


Mike Treder
By Mike Treder
Responsible Nanotechnology

Posted: Aug 1, 2007

On July 30th I gave an hour-long presentation on “Nanotechnology and the Future of Warfare” at the World Future Society’s annual conference. You can view the presentation here.

About 60 people attended and peppered me with many excellent questions both during and after my talk. Overall, the audience was quite enthusiastic and responsive.

I opened by quoting from Harvard University professor Steven Pinker, who recently wrote:

Violence has been in decline over long stretches of history, and today we are probably living in the most peaceful moment of our species’ time on earth…

In the decade of Darfur and Iraq, and shortly after the century of Stalin, Hitler, and Mao, the claim that violence has been diminishing may seem somewhere between hallucinatory and obscene. Yet recent studies that seek to quantify the historical ebb and flow of violence point to exactly that conclusion.

The big question, of course, is whether this evident decline in violence can be expected to continue. I then discussed what I consider to be an approaching period of perilous geopolitical instability, when…

  • Weapons of mass destruction will be more varied, more deadly, more available, cheaper to obtain, and easier to hide.
  • The strength (and the ambitions) of regional powers will increase rapidly while the stabilizing might of the U.S. could be in decline.
  • New technologies such as genetic engineering, robotics, nanotechnology, and possibly artificial intelligence could enable radical shifts in the balance of power.
  • Global climatic conditions – including increased frequency and severity of killer storms, droughts, infrastructure damage, crop failures, and even whole ecosystem collapses – will contribute to growing tensions.

Maelstrom_2

After reviewing the basics of nanotechnology and desktop manufacturing, I turned to the topic of WMDs and the future of warfare. I asked the audience to consider these three important points:

  1. In modern warfare, the target of attack is not the opposing military – it is the will and capacity of states to make war.
  2. The real target of WMDs is not the victims, but the survivors.
  3. WMD = Not just weapons of destruction, but also of disruption.

We then spent some time talking about the four main elements that comprise weapons systems. These are: a) payloads; b) methods of targeting; c) modes of delivery; and d) means of production. In each area we are seeing rapid change, bringing radically enhanced, more dangerous, and potentially more disruptive military applications.

The most significant of these elements may be the last, the means of production. When applied to weapons of mass destruction/disruption, it could be a titanic lever for dramatically shifting balances of power.

Weapons_3

Finally, I asked people to think about the future of warfare in four dimensions:

  1. Technologies - Which will be the most powerful and possibly destabilizing future military technologies?
  2. Timing - How soon could change arise, and what might take us by surprise?
  3. Context - What other societal shifts, outside of technology, must be taken into account to envision a near future geopolitical environment?
  4. Policies - Which combination of national, international, corporate, and civil society policy planning will lead to the safest world of tomorrow?

It’s difficult in just one hour to convey all the complexities of such a big topic, and it’s even tougher in a 500-word blog article. Obviously, we discussed a lot more than what I’m able to include here. Please ask if you want elaboration on any of these points.

 


Mike Treder is a former Managing Director of the IEET.
Print Email permalink (3) Comments (5118) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


I’m doing a “future paper” on the future of warfare in 10, 25 and 50 years. I was wondering if you could enlighten me on the subject.
Some questions I have are; Do you think wars will become more frequent or less? Will the military be mostly robots or automated systems? Will Religion become a primary war?

Thank You,
Sara





Thank you for responding! I just have a couple more questions on the Economics. In the future will we still have malls and stores or will everything be online? Will we still be using coins and dollar bills in the future?

Thanks again,
Sara





In my un-doctoral opinion (UDO), combat-warfare will be replaced by economic warfare. However there’s always the WHEN. Futurism is a good deal (for the futurist, that is) because he can postulate any timeframe he pleases; he can write: “by 2068 all outright warfare will have been replaced by economic warfare.”
If outright warfare still exists in 2068, who is going to file a lawsuit?





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Ray Kurzweil’s acceptance speech at TV07

Previous entry: The Immortalists

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376