Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

The Simulated Future

Stambler, de Grey @ Super Longevity Conference

Humanism and its prefixes (non-, trans-, post-, in-, a-)

IEET Audience Divided on Minimum Wage and Technological Unemployment

Visibility of IEET Jumps This Week

Virtual Reality and Reality Augmentation

ieet books

Surviving AI: The promise and peril of artificial intelligence
Calum Chace


etienne thillaye on 'Egalitarianism is not Radical' (Oct 3, 2015)

hankpellissier on 'Transhumanist Petition to Disavow Zoltan Istvan Candidacy for US Presidency' (Oct 3, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'How Nature Plays the Lottery' (Oct 3, 2015)

instamatic on 'Envy of the Future' (Oct 2, 2015)

AlonzoTG on 'Technology and Human Dignity' (Oct 2, 2015)

Giulio Prisco on 'The Marxist and Christian Roots of Transhumanism' (Oct 2, 2015)

Giulio Prisco on 'Why I still Support Charlie Hebdo' (Oct 2, 2015)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Seven Emerging Technologies That Will Change the World Forever
Sep 29, 2015
(103440) Hits
(4) Comments

The price of the Internet of Things will be a vague dread of a malicious world
Sep 25, 2015
(23499) Hits
(3) Comments

This Artificially Intelligent Boss Means the Workplace Will Never Be the Same
Sep 18, 2015
(16420) Hits
(1) Comments

Religion and Superintelligence
Sep 12, 2015
(8345) Hits
(0) Comments

IEET > Security > SciTech > Fellows > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (2894) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Systems of Mass Disruption

Mike Treder
By Mike Treder
Responsible Nanotechnology

Posted: Dec 2, 2007

A few days ago, I was privileged to make a presentation on “Nanotechnology and the Future of Warfare” to a group of senior officers and affiliated civilian researchers at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. We had an enjoyable, wide-ranging, three-hour discussion about molecular manufacturing, climate change, global politics, and the ways in which wars are fought.

Although I would never presume to lecture professional service officers on military history or military science, they seemed to appreciate some of the insights I offered, not just about nanotechnology, but also about the future of weaponry and warfare in general.

One of the points I made (which is not original to me) is that in modern warfare, the real target of attack is not the opposing military—it is the will and capacity of states to make war.

Similarly, the real target of weapons of mass destruction is not the victims, but the survivors.

A useful way to look at this is to consider WMD to stand not only for destruction, but equally for disruption.

And if you think about it even further, you can see that WMDs are more than just weapons; in fact, they comprise whole systems.

I’ve broken down these systems of mass disruption into four distinct components:

  1. Payloads
  2. Modes of delivery
  3. Methods of targeting
  4. Means of production

So, how will advanced nanotechology affect these SMDs?

First, “signatures” of WMD will be reduced at the same time as payloads are increased. We could see much smaller signatures—nearly vanishing—and far more destruction, thanks to nanotechnology.

In place of nuclear, chemical, or biological warheads, huge numbers of simple, low-tech, but still highly damaging devices could be produced. You might think of them as the equivalent of the Molotov cocktail, but delivered simultaneously by the millions to precision targets.

Nothing more exotic than that is needed to create mass destruction and mass disruption. Such weapons could be made cheaply, in nearly unlimited numbers, and with almost no detectable signature unless nanofactory technology is effectively regulated.

Modes of delivery—whether they are UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), armies of small robotic crawlers, or space-based—will be equally inexpensive to produce and deploy in vast quantities. Ubiquitous sensors for surveillance, target tracking, and weapons control, enabled by low-cost supercomputing and also produced by molecular manufacturing, will greatly enhance methods of targeting.

Of the four components I mentioned, the most important and potentially most disruptive is the last: means of production. Advances might be made in the other three areas without reliance on nanofactory technology, but they will have relatively limited impact by comparison. However, when we reach the point that an atomically-precise general-purpose manufacturing system can be reproduced exponentially, then systems of mass disruption will take on a whole new meaning.


Mike Treder is a former Managing Director of the IEET.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (2895) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Rushkoff’s Third Testament Series Graphic Novel Out

Previous entry: Question Authority and the Open Source Party


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-297-2376

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @