IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


The Chemistry of Love

Human-racism and biopolitics in SF

Dupuy’s “anti-humanism”

Singularities Enough, and Time

Aging: the disease, the cure, the implications

Recent Comments


Roko on 'Singularities Enough, and Time' (2008 07 03)

Michalis on 'Getting Paid in Our Jobless Future' (2008 07 03)

director on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)

rich on 'Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective' (2008 07 02)

jerry on 'It's the Business of the Future to be Dangerous' (2008 07 01)




IEET Fora




"Skin has become inadequate in interfacing with reality. Technology has become the body's new membrane of existence."
Nam June Paik



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Life > Innovation > Fellows > Mike Treder

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Enabling Nanotechnologies


Mike Treder

Mike Treder


Responsible Nanotechnology


Posted: Jan 17, 2008

Enabling nanotechnologies are those that may represent significant steps toward the eventual realization of exponential general-purpose molecular manufacturing.

These kinds of technologies are not yet molecular manufacturing, in the classic sense, and in fact their developers may not be actively working in that direction. However, progress made by these technologies can bear watching, because they may enable, or make easier, the development of significant portions of molecular manufacturing’s full range of needed technical capabilities.

Here are a couple of good examples…

THE TECHNOLOGY:

DNA ‘Fabricator’

The goal of being able to program biochemical reactions as precisely and easily as computers crunch numbers and process words has moved a giant step closer.

A group at the California Institute of Technology, led by biomolecular engineer Niles Pierce, has created a DNA-based fabricator.

This is a system that allows the team to specify a piece of DNA with a desired shape and function, and then execute a molecular program to assemble it in a test tube. As an example, they used their system to construct a piece of DNA that walks along another strip of.

Just as computer languages let programmers create any number of applications, the researchers behind the approach predict that biochemical programming “languages” inspired by their work could let bioengineers create any number of desired molecular products and processes. . .

“We have shown that you can actually program the interactions between these molecules to implement different dynamic functions using the same components,” says Pierce. . .

Pierce admits, however, that the group has taken just the first few steps towards programming biological structures and functions at will.

Still, he says, a few years ago audience members laughed when he said he wanted to create a compiler to automate the process of encoding desired functions into DNA sequences. “Our field has now progressed to the point where the real question is not whether it can be done, but how far it can be pushed.”

WHY IT’S ENABLING:

This is significant for two reasons. First, because it is an important ‘proof of concept’, a clear indication that molecular processes can be operated under programmed control. And second, because much of the learning process taking place here may later be applied to diamondoid nanomachinery operating in vacuum, instead of nucleic acid machines operating in solution; many of the programming principles should be the same.

It’s important to note the enormity of this step. If nanomachinery can be programmed to reliably carry out specific functions, that should allow for the deployment of vast arrays of identical or similar machines performing their tasks in unison—which is moving close to the ultimate goal of a nanofactory, where trillions of operations could take place simultaneously in order to build powerful products quickly, cleanly, and inexpensively.


THE TECHNOLOGY:

‘Darkest Ever’ Material

The “darkest ever” substance known to science has been made in a US laboratory. The material was created from carbon nanotubes - sheets of carbon just one atom thick rolled up into cylinders.

Researchers say it is the closest thing yet to the ideal black material, which absorbs light perfectly at all angles and over all wavelengths. The discovery is expected to have applications in the fields of electronics and solar energy. . .

Commenting on the study, Professor Sir John Pendry, who first predicted that such a discovery might be possible, said the results were promising.

“They’ve made the blackest material known to science,” the theoretical physicist from Imperial College, London, told BBC News. “The application will be to things like more efficient solar cells, more efficient solar panels and any application where you need to harvest light,” he added.

WHY IT’S ENABLING:

If this initial finding holds up, it could be very good news for the future of solar energy, which in turn will likely be an important component of molecular manufacturing infrastructure.  It is expected that nanofactories will be highly energy-efficient—especially in comparison to the macroscale factories they will replace—but they still will require significant amounts of energy input.

CRN has often promoted the idea that molecular manufacturing will make solar energy collection and storage far more efficient and cost effective. This news about the unique absorption properties of carbon nanotubes is a meaningful step toward the realization of CRN’s hope that solar power can play a vital role in meeting the world’s energy needs without pouring more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.


Mike Treder is a fellow of the IEET, and the Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, an organization working to raise awareness of the issues presented by advanced nanotechnology.

permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Jonathan Haidt: Enlightenment 2.0 requires Morality 2.0

Previous entry: Russell Blackford is the New Editor of the Journal of Evolution and Technology

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376