Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, with limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Hughes @ Technologies of Awareness: Buddhism and the New Mind Sciences

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space


comments

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

splashjc on 'Avatar: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Security > Eco-gov > Rights > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalink • (6) Comments • (316) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




Conflicted Over Majestic Architecture


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: Apr 22, 2009

As a lover of majestic architecture, I am acutely conflicted, because many of the most amazing building projects on the planet are taking place in Dubai, a location where conditions for workers are uncomfortably close to those of ancient Egypt. Is it possible to foresee a time when a progressive egalitarian society might produce brilliant, stately, inspiring structures?

Who would not marvel, as I have, when standing at the feet of the great pyramids in Giza? Can any but the most jaded fail to be awed by the Eiffel Tower, the Taj Mahal, or the Palace of Versailles?

We still wonder today how structures such as Stonehenge, the statues of Easter Island, and the Great Wall of China could have been built by mere men using simple tools. Of course, we know that more often than not, slave labor—or something close to it—performed the decades of agonizing, sometimes killing, heavy work.

In the case of more modern wonders, it’s usually true that they were built from the top down, so to speak, financed and directed by those who had substantial capital or political power, or both.

Look at the greatest architectural treasures of the United States. From the Empire State Building to the Golden Gate Bridge to the graceful antebellum mansions of the Mississippi Valley, none could have been raised without significant financing and authoritarian control.

Does that knowledge necessarily lessen our appreciation for the intrinsic beauty or grandeur of such constructions? It doesn’t have to, although an understanding of the hardships suffered by those who performed the real labor can give us a different perspective.

As a lover of majestic architecture, I am acutely conflicted, because many of the most amazing building projects on the planet are taking place in Dubai, a location where conditions for workers are uncomfortably close to those of ancient Egypt.



Burj Dubai




Palm Islands




Nakheel Tower

Would I prefer that political and economic systems were different in Dubai, more enlightened, even if that meant that such visionary wonders as the Burj Dubai, the Palm Islands, or the Nakheel Tower might never get built? Of course I would, but part of me still would regret that their sheer beauty is denied to the world.

Is it possible to foresee a time when a progressive egalitarian society might produce brilliant, stately, and inspiring architecture? We know that beauty is not wholly confined to authoritarian or oligarchical systems: witness the Sydney Opera House or the incredible Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain. But there does seem to be a barrier of top-down organization and capital that effectively limits the size and majesty of structures created by what we could consider enlightened societies.

If you look a little deeper into this conundrum, you’ll see that it’s not just architecture that is affected. In fact, that’s just a symbol of a greater, more challenging philosophical problem that I’ll write about in my next IEET article.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


I couldn't help but catch all the descriptions Mr. Treder used to describe these structures: "majestic, brilliant, stately, inspiring, great treasures, graceful, intrinsic beauty, grandeur, visionary, incredible, sheer beauty."

Being someone who prefers the countryside over the city, I usually reserve these terms for things like waterfalls, mountains, pristine lakes, and fields of flowers. For really cool man-made structures, I will usually just say that they're "cool." However, I get more excited about the beauty of a structure (though I might call it extrinsic beauty instead of intrinsic beauty), even a humble one, if I knew that it was built with love and complete honesty.



Well, I've made no secret of my love for grand architecture, and I'm not about to argue whether it's rational or not. I'm simply reflecting a feeling of awe that I get when I see what man can build -- even when I know the dark stories behind so many of these marvels.

That said, I have equally strong feelings of awe and appreciation for the wonders of nature, including all the things you described. One does not negate the other.



Recent research demonstrates the Stonehenge was a geometrically inspired structure. The stones were positioned to a predetermined architectural plan - which much have been designed on a ‘prehistoric drawing board’. The idea that the stones were aligned on distant sightlines has finally been de-bunked.

What we have is a symmetrical mirrored structure set astride the axis of the longest and shortest days of the year. It’s time for architects to sit up and take note of the planning of Stonehenge, moving the stones was an effort , but the design and setting out the arrays a work of pure genius. More details below.

http://www.solvingstonehenge.com



The Egyptian pyramids, the Athenian temples on the Parthenon and the Gothic cathedrals were built by guilds of freemen. This does not negate your points about the economies and hierarchies of these societies, but it does introduce nuances, particularly of motivation and reward. Additionally, cultural and linguistic definitions placed disproportionate favor on constructs that stand out (think phallic) instead of equally inspired constructs that blend.



Those at the top of an authoritarian society have an interest in advertising their superiority. Keeping the average person convinced that "those at the top simply deserve to be at the top" is key to perpetuating their rule over a population that might otherwise wrestle control through their collective might.

Egalitarian societies have less need for this type of posturing and tend to view it as suspicious. You can see this attitude expressed in the explicit distrust of beauty that's part of western civilization's current art culture. They would probably be interested in asking, what exactly are these buildings inspiring us to think or do?

How would you feel about these same buildings if they were built in Los Vegas? If you'd be less enthusiastic about them, I'd argue your admiration for them stems from some (false?) assumption you're making about the builders and not from the structure's inherent beauty.

If the main appeal of monumental scale art is that it reflects the highest values and aspirations of an entire civilization (like say Egypt), then it probably can't help but come off as pretentious when attempted in a hyper-diverse culture like our own. I'm sure we'll have buildings similar to these soon enough, but, to the average person, I doubt they'll "mean something" anymore than an ergonomic office chair "means something".



o my got is veru very very wondreful



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Happy Earth Day

Previous entry: Doug Rushkoff's New Radio Show and NPR TV Series

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376