Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space

Design Outside the Box

Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?

History is Contingent, Built on Flukes, Accidents, and Surprises

Compassion

What Would You Say?


comments

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 20, 2010)

Dale McCarty on 'Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment' (Mar 19, 2010)

S on 'No More Libertarians' (Mar 19, 2010)

Tony Bateson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)

bensmyson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Security > Biosecurity > SciTech > Rights > Neuroethics > Privacy > Life > Implants > Staff > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalink • (6) Comments • (71) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




You 2.0


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: Nov 27, 2009

An upgraded version of You might incorporate—literally incorporate—access to augmented reality overlays, a direct brain to Internet connection, and LED (light-emitting diode) tattoos.

Augmented reality displayed on a cell phone is an application that’s here already, however primitive it might be by comparison with mature versions of the technology that will come along in another two or three years.


But that’s just the beginning. For some people, it will be considered preferable to have that same information—and more—available not through a hand-held device, but in a heads-up display that projects directly in front of your field of vision. One way to do that would be through a special pair of eyeglasses, but an even more sophisticated approach would be to build the necessary circuitry into your high-tech contact lenses.

A contact lens that harvests radio waves to power an LED is paving the way for a new kind of display. The lens is a prototype of a device that could display information beamed from a mobile device.

Realising that display size is increasingly a constraint in mobile devices, Babak Parviz at the University of Washington, in Seattle, hit on the idea of projecting images into the eye from a contact lens.

One of the limitations of current head-up displays is their limited field of view. A contact lens display can have a much wider field of view. “Our hope is to create images that effectively float in front of the user perhaps 50 cm to 1 m away,” says Parviz.

What’s amusing is that this article makes it sound as if Mr. Parviz is the first one ever to come up with the idea. Not doubting the value or impressiveness of his work, of course, but the concept of importing data through a contact lens for heads-up display is decades old. Transhumanists—and visionary science fiction writers before them—have long looked forward to this possibility.

Once this is achieved, you might then have access to all the information currently available through your cell phone not only at your fingertips, but at your eye-tips, so to speak.

You could see this:


Or maybe this:


But why not take another step beyond and instead of having the data routed and accessed on the outside of your body, make a direct mind-computer interface, allowing You 2.0 to “see” everything on the Web inside your head!

Although this is still firmly in the realm of science fiction, it is moving gradually closer to reality day by day. In fact, according to a recent article at PhysOrg:

Computer chip maker Intel wants to implant a brain-sensing chip directly into the brains of its customers to allow them to operate computers and other devices without moving a muscle.

Intel believes its customers would be willing to have a chip implanted in their brains so they could operate computers without the need for a keyboard or mouse using thoughts alone. The implant could also be used to operate devices such as cell phones, TVs and DVDs.

The chip is being developed at Intel’s laboratory in Pittsburgh, USA. It would sense brain activity using technology based on FMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging). The brain sensing chips are not yet available, but Intel research scientist Dean Pomerleau thinks they are close.

Admittedly, having a chip implanted in your brain that allows you to turn the TV on or off using the power of thought is not the same as having an integrated Web browser in your skull, but it does seem like a significant step in that direction.

And after we’ve reached that point, when You 2.0 can read blogs, surf for porn, or watch the news inside your head, what happens if you want to share some of what you’re seeing with someone else?

One way to do it could be like we do now, by sending a link to that other person. But another way might be to actually display what you want to share right on your skin, via an LED tattoo:

Animated and programmable LED tattoos connected to your brain? You could show off your latest Flash animations, watch TV on your arm, or have a built-in PDA screen. The possibilities are endless. Perhaps more than simply a fashion statement, you could use such LED tattoos to display medical information about your body such as blood-sugar readings.

Wonders, marvels, medical miracles, life-enhancing discoveries—it is an amazing new world that You and Me 2.0 are entering. Now all we have to do is figure out what the downsides might be, and how to avoid them.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


Now all we have to do is figure out what the downsides might be, and how to avoid them.

Or perhaps we can just enjoy the thought for a little while, instead of thinking immediately of the downsides. It is bad for the liver you know.



Not to mention sending feedback to the net just by seeing/thinking ......
eg...
** Microsoft is working on Tagging Images with Your Mind - http://bit.ly/4tMgWj

on HMD stuff checkout this demo..
Craig Kapp, has a working HMD unit with the Vuzix VR920 model and the ARCam - http://bit.ly/4Njoc2

Not quite this augmented reality gaming demo , but tech is coming closer...... http://bit.ly/8dVtkl



Oh, joy. Programmable tramp stamps. Does our society really need those?



"Now all we have to do is figure out what the downsides might be, and how to avoid them. "

Avid readers of IEET have seen many such possible downsides in the articles and/or comments.



It would be interesting to see some serious applications for this kind of technology such as with disabilities of blindness and possible uses concerning Cross-modal plasticity. Even with limited complexities it proposes some interesting possibilities of converting visual information, such as objects, landmarks, obstacles, face recognition etc. directly to hearing, and may even provide an option for the replacement of guide dogs for the blind?

I guess that not many folks noticed your insertion in the picture of the registered sex offender who drinks coke! Just one of the many dangers of misuse and of human rights violations that these technologies would be open to – if we permit it to happen? And do we really need to turn the TV off with our minds? Do we need to be engulfed with useless trivial information – that is profitable for an advertiser to send and display to sell you something, …always to sell you "some thing!"



I had a character in a science fiction story I wrote reject the idea of an internal internet connection as security headache and a likely waste of time. She uses a smartphone instead. She does have an HUD that gives a readout of radiation conditions. This is useful since she lives around works with living reactors.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: We Perform Best When No One Tells Us What To Do

Previous entry: Technoprogressive Thankfulness

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376