Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Ideasthesia: How do ideas feel?

Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now

Practopoiesis: How Cybernetics of Biology can Help AI

Aqua: meeting the challenge of freshwater depletion

Debunking the 5 Most Common Meditation Myths

Condoms are So Hundred Years Ago: Why Better Birth Control for Men Would Be Better for Everyone


ieet books

The Future of Business
Author
Ed. Rohit Talwar


comments

Valkyrie Ice on 'Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now' (Jul 4, 2015)

spud100 on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

Alexey Turchin on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

spud100 on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

Alexey Turchin on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

spud100 on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

ChristopherMaddsen on 'Tinkering with Consciousness' (Jul 2, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Universal Basic Income—The Foundation of a Technically Advanced Society
Jun 15, 2015
(47177) Hits
(6) Comments

Should Politicians be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence? Interview with Mark Waser
Jun 12, 2015
(19039) Hits
(3) Comments

Will Artificial Intelligence be a Buddha? Is Fear of AI just a symptom of Human Self-Loathing?
Jun 17, 2015
(11205) Hits
(5) Comments

Atheism in Zambia - skeptical, rational thought in a very superstitious country
Jun 23, 2015
(10138) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Security > SciTech > Rights > Personhood > Vision > Bioculture > Futurism > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Mike Treder

Print Email permalink (5) Comments (8731) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Sex Slaves, Polls, and Ethics


Mike Treder
By Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: Dec 2, 2009

In a recently concluded poll, we asked, “If you had a personal robot that could do only one thing, which ability would you prefer it to have?” Is the question itself unethical?

At some point within the next few decades, it seems likely that technology will allow the creation of humanoid robots so lifelike it may be hard to tell them apart from real flesh and blood humans.

If the computer brains housed within contain a high level of artificial intelligence—perhaps so sophisticated that they could fool us into believing they are sentient—then will we still have the right to own those robots as property? To, in essence, treat them as slaves?

Dozens of speculative novels have been written on this subject, of course, most famously by science fiction grand master Isaac Asimov, and more recently given an interesting twist by friend of the IEET David Brin in Kiln People.

image  image

Not long ago we came across a clever viral video purporting to show a feminized robot being marketed as the Perfect Woman:


Although this is just a gag, for now, it seems clear in the not-too-distant future a leading commercial application for personal robots could be as “companions” and/or sex toys. So, we thought it would be amusing to post a poll asking our readers what specialty they would find most useful in a robot they might own someday.

Here are the results:

image

image

Not everyone found our poll to be amusing, however. One person asked, “Why is ‘sex-slave’ a choice? isn’t this a human rights issue!?” And another said, “The sex ‘slave’ trade is a serious matter. Please remove this choice.”

They are right, of course, that sex slavery is indeed a human rights issue and a very serious matter. We had no intention of making light of this contemporary abomination.

But we did want to raise the question in a future context of manufactured non-human entities. At some point, society will have to grapple with a host of issues that will be raised, including personhood, human rights, property rights, marriage, etc. New technologies such as robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and bio-engineering could bring us face to face with beings that are not human but that demand to be accorded all the rights and privileges of humanity.

That’s the whole reason for the IEET to exist: to stimulate and support constructive study of ethical issues connected with powerful emerging technologies.


Mike Treder is a former Managing Director of the IEET.
Print Email permalink (5) Comments (8732) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


I concur fully with (rather than oppose, as mentioned in the article) the inclusion of ‘sex slave’ as a choice for the poll. What if the robots could be made with no consciousness of who they are, then they could be used for companionship by lonely single men? I dont think we are tripping on an ethical issue here if the robots have no sense of self-consciousness or identity.





Agreed. And examples in media (Six, the sex droid of ‘Tripping the Rift,’ the similar entity played by Jude Law in ‘A.I.: Artificial Intelligence, Star Trek’s Commander ‘I have been programmed in multiple techniques’ Data, and others) suggest that the interest already exists for such things.

It’s perfectly valid to ask who would actually want it, if only to learn something about ourselves…





What bothered me was not the inclusion of ‘sex slave’ as an option, but the fact that it was the only case that explicitly included ‘slave’. This would be considered an inexcusable methodological flaw if you meant for your poll to be taken seriously.

That said, I was rather surprised by the percentage of ‘sex slave’ respondents. I just hope it is because they were able to see beyond the rhetoric.





And how many people answer this poll ?





Check out this article: World’s first sex robot revealed at porn show - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10619497#





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Artie’s Wheels

Previous entry: Aubrey de Grey on CNN

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376