Subscribe Join Our Facebook Group
MULTIMEDIA: Andrew Maynard Topics Toxicologists are Freakin’ Awesome!
7 surprising facts about silver nanoparticles and health
The science of “anti-vaccination” – a great primer from SciShow
Five hot topics in Risk Science for 2013
What we need is a Tom Lehrer-style Elements of Risk Song
Five Things Worth Knowing About Ebola
SETI Institute: Risky tales: Talking with Seth Shostak at Big Picture Science
When Do We Quarantine or Isolate for Ebola?
Color My Poop Beautiful – now on video
Think Small (as in Nano Small)


Subscribe to IEET Lists Daily News Feed
Longevity Dividend List
Catastrophic Risks List
Biopolitics of Popular Culture List
Technoprogressive List
Trans-Spirit List


Andrew Maynard Topics
Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Technoprogressivism > Biosecurity > Eco-gov > SciTech
Andrew Maynard
#12: Bad luck and cancer; did the media get it wrong? by Andrew Maynard

According to IEET readers, what were the most stimulating stories of 2015? This month we’re answering that question by posting a countdown of the top 30 articles published this year on our blog (out of more than 1,000), based on how many total hits each one received.

The following piece was first published here on January 3, 2015, and is the #12 most viewed of the year.

GlobalDemocracySecurity > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Eco-gov
Andrew Maynard
Should You Be Concerned About Gene Drives? by Andrew Maynard

Gene editing and gene drives are rapidly emerging as the disruptive technologies du jour.  But what are they, what can they do, and why should you care?

Contributors > Andrew Maynard
Andrew Maynard to direct the new Risk Innovation Lab at Arizona State University Risk Science Center April Newsletter

After five years directing the University of Michigan Risk Science Center, popular IEET Contributor Andrew Maynard is leaving to take a position at Arizona State University.  There he will direct the Risk Innovation Lab, a new center for research and practice around creative approaches to risk.

Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > HealthLongevity > Enablement > Sociology > Philosophy > Psychology > Futurism > Technoprogressivism > Innovation
Andrew Maynard
Politics Don’t Always Play a Role in Attitudes Toward Science Issues by Andrew Maynard

Political leanings are frequently associated with attitudes toward science and technology in the U.S.  Yet as the most recent poll  from the Pew Research Center on Americans, Politics and Science Issues shows, public attitudes toward science and technology depend on a far more diverse and complex set of factors.

Rights > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Psychology > PostGender
Andrew Maynard
A Call to Proactively Support Women in Science by Andrew Maynard

The past few decades have seen a substantial and positive shift in attitudes towards women in science and engineering.  And yet, they continue to face an uphill struggle against ingrained attitudes and actions that create barriers to having a full, rewarding, equitable, and respected career in fields encompassed by science, technology, engineering and math.

GlobalDemocracySecurity > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > HealthLongevity > SciTech
Andrew Maynard
Should indoor tanning be banned? by Andrew Maynard

Just how dangerous is indoor tanning?

A couple of weeks ago, colleagues from the University of Michigan published an article with a rather stark recommendation:

GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Futurism > Nanotechnology
Andrew Maynard
Is novelty in nanomaterials overrated when it comes to risk? by Andrew Maynard

Novelty and nanotechnology are deeply intertwined. The search for nanostructure-enabled materials has driven research funding in nanotechnology for well over a decade now; the exploitation of novel properties has underpinned the commercialization of nanomaterials; and concerns over potential risks has stimulated widespread studies into what makes these materials harmful. Yet ‘novelty’ is an ephemeral quality, and despite its close association with nanotechnology, it may be an unreliable guide to ensuring the long-term safety of materials...

Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard
Andrew Maynard
No New York Times, wearable computers couldn’t be as harmful as cigarettes! by Andrew Maynard

I was taken aback- to say the least – by an article from the New York Times that crossed my Twitter feed today that suggested wearable electronics like the new Apple Watch could be has harmful as smoking: Could Wearable Computers Be as Harmful as Cigarettes? http://t.co/JvM1mnR2Tz — NYT Styles (@NYTStyles) March 18, 2015 (Tweet has since been deleted)

Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Innovation
Andrew Maynard
Solving public health challenges through innovation by Andrew Maynard

Last Thursday, the second annual University of Michigan Innovation In Action competition concluded, with six stunning student pitches for startups that could make a significant dent on the health and well-being of communities.  It was a great example of what can be achieved at the intersection of public health, entrepreneurship, and the creativity and energy that students can bring to real-world problems.

Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Andrew Maynard > Biosecurity > SciTech
Andrew Maynard
Dunkin’ Donuts ditches titanium dioxide – but is it actually harmful? by Andrew Maynard

In response to pressure from the advocacy group As You Sow, Dunkin’ Brands has announced that it will be removing allegedly “nano” titanium dioxide from Dunkin’ Donuts’ powdered sugar donuts. As You Sow claims there are safety concerns around the use of the material, while Dunkin’ Brands cites concerns over investor confidence. It’s a move that further confirms the food sector’s conservatism over adopting new technologies in the face of public uncertainty. But how justified is it based on what ...