Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Overview of technopolitics

whats new at ieet

Peut-on aimer un robot (ou une IA) ?

Hoffer’s The True Believer and Trump

Resilience Technology Part II: Simple measures to thwart possible collapse

Any sufficiently advanced totalitarianism is indistinguishable from Facebook

nti-âge : le scénario du « miracle de Washington »

Super hurricanes and solar storms and EMP… lessons about resilient tech (Part I)

ieet books

Philosophy’s Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress
Russell Blackford and Damien Broderick eds.


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Comment on this entry

Road to immortality: why aren’t oldest humans getting older?

Dick Pelletier

Ethical Technology

December 10, 2012

In the Broadway musical Fame, Carmen sings about wanting to live forever. Of course, this is not possible today, but many positive thinkers believe that in the near future, biotech breakthroughs, along with nanomedicine advances, could provide an indefinite lifespan; eliminating most causes of death.


Complete entry


Posted by Kyriazis  on  12/11  at  03:28 AM

Stem cells and bio-printing, together with nanotechnology and synthetic biology are promising avenues to explore. However, it is unlikely that a basic evolutionary process such as aging is going to be entirely and permanently controlled by these approaches alone. It is like trying to find treatments which permanently stop babies growing up.

Aging is an extension of a normal developmental mechanism which has an evolutionary aim: the survival of the species.  In order to outline ways that are likely to be effective we need to use other approaches, based on entropy and thermodynamics, mathematics and even philosophy.

Posted by Kris Notaro  on  12/11  at  05:28 AM

I can see how “entropy and thermodynamics, mathematics and even philosophy” can help end the aging process, however, once the human genome is 100 percent simulated on a computer, once cells are simulated in real time with all parts working, one can imagine that you will then be able to simulate an organ, up to the entire body. Immense computing power will need to exist indeed, to simulate every atom, every compound, and proten, etc. Once that is accomplished we will be able to manipulate the body in such a way, on the computer, to design designer drugs, gene therapy, and full organ replacement to cater to the individual and masses.

Posted by Dick Pelletier  on  12/11  at  10:29 AM

  I envision an incredible future unfolding in the coming decades. Today’s healthcare advances are only the beginning.

  Futurists Ray Kurzweil and Institute for Molecular Manufacturing’s Robert Freitas believe that tiny medical nano-devices expected by late 2020s will provide radical upgrades to our bodies. “We won’t reengineer our bodies all at once”, Kurzweil says, “It will be an incremental process accomplished one benign step at a time over decades”.

    Today we prevent many diseases through nutrition and supplements, and we look forward to biotech and nanotech breakthroughs expected in the 2020s that will replace defective and aging organs with stem cell therapies, genetic engineering, and advanced nanomaterials.

    Kurzweil also predicts that in the coming decades, progress in cognitive sciences will enable non-biological intelligence to merge with our biological brains.

    As we learn more about our body, experts say we can engineer new systems with dramatic improvements. Freitas believes that by the 2030s, we could create artificial respirocytes that would allow us to hold our breath for 4 hours and sprint for 15 minutes without taking a breath.

    Even more radical, with respirocytes providing extended access to oxygen, nanobots could remove carbon dioxide from our cells, which would eliminate the need for lungs. Without lungs, we would no longer require breathable air! This will give us incredible abilities. We could live in space and on other planets with little technology help.

    In his book, Fantastic Voyage, Kurzweil describes how we could reengineer our digestive system, enabling nanobots to deliver nutrients directly into our cells, eliminating the need for food. To implement this technology, we would wear a ‘nutrient belt’ loaded with millions of nutrient-bearing ‘bots, which would enter and leave the body through our skin.

    However, many may want to hang on to their food-eating pleasures, so scientists propose a special digestive tract to receive real food, but bar those nutrients from entering the blood stream. ‘Bots would convert this food into molecules and route it into the ‘nutrient belt’. This would allow us to eat anything we want – no harm, no foul.

    The next organ on our hit list is the heart, a remarkable machine, but one that is too often subject to failure. Freitas has designed a revolutionary nano-robotic blood cell system that he believes could eliminate the need for a heart.

    This configuration would also eliminate need for kidneys, bladder, liver, lower esophagus, stomach, intestines, bowel, and skeleton. We will need to keep our skin, sex organs, mouth and upper esophagus for touching, talking and eating, but scientists believe we could also replace these parts with an exotic ‘nano-skin’, which offers greater protection from physical force and extreme temperatures, and may even provide more enjoyable sex and touch.

    The most amazing application of this future includes replacing the brain. Scientists hope to reverse-engineer the brain by mid 2020s or so, and with efforts to capture thought at moment of creation underway at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, forward-thinkers believe we can one day replace neurons with materials that process information at supercomputer speeds.

    Will this ‘magical future’ happen? Forward-thinkers see these radical advances as our next evolutionary step, which could become reality by 2050. Comments welcome.

Posted by Pastor_Alex  on  12/12  at  12:30 PM

Some research I have been doing recently suggests that the biggest contributor to poor health at this present time is not our living habits. Whether we exercise, smoke or eat healthy or unhealthy has an aggregate effect of about 20% on the likelihood of being healthy or not. The largest indicator of health is one’s level of wealth. Poverty has a 40 - 50% effect on whether one can expect to be healthy and long lived.

While clothes that monitor our day to day health might be cool, I don’t think they will have a huge effect on global health since the people who would need them won’t be able to afford them. What we need is a multifaceted plan to address health concerns, but also to address poverty that is the single greatest preventable cause of death that faces us at this time.

Add your comment here:




Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
35 Harbor Point Blvd, #404, Boston, MA 02125-3242 USA
Email: director @