IEET > Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Staff > J. Hughes
2012 in Review (and Appeal for Support)
Dec 20, 2012  

This end of year appeal for support comes a little later than usual because I (J. Hughes) was rocked by the recent Sandy Hook school shooting, about 25 miles from my office at Trinity College. As a social scientist and public policy person I try to keep my eye on the big picture, the tens of thousands of people who are killed every day by violence, treatable disease, poverty and inadequate infrastructure.  I try not to let my proximity to some tragedies distract from the larger and more persistent needs of the world. But as a parent and someone with many small connections to Sandy Hook I was left stunned and tearful for days. And angry that the balance of forces in American politics has prevented us from having the simple and effective public policies around guns and mental health that have kept the incidence of gun violence and mass killings lower in other industrialized countries.

When we started the IEET seven years ago it was our goal to bring futurists and techno-optimists to the struggle for sane public policies. We have worked to reach out to academe, policy makers and the public to inform progressive social movements about the threats and promises of emerging technologies. Advocates of both gun control and arms control need to be thinking about how we can keep automatic weapons and weapons of mass destruction from proliferating in a world with ubiquitous desktop manufacturing.  Advocates of improved mental health screening and treatment need to be thinking about how genetic testing and brain fingerprinting will be used to identify potential psychopaths, and how psychopharmaceuticals and brain prosthetics will be used to treat them.  How much cognitive liberty will we need to give up to obligatory moral enhancement in a world where individuals can wreak mass havoc with readily accessible weapons?

Directly addressing that question, in March of 2012 we held a day-long seminar on moral enhancement at New York University as part of a co-sponsored meeting on the Moral Brain.  We conferred with leaders in moral neurology like Paul Bloom, Molly Crockett, Josh Greene, Jon Haidt and Josh Knobe about whether our new insights into the role of chemicals like oxytocin, or syndromes like autism, were giving us ways to treat psychopathy and enhance ordinary moral cognition.

A couple months before that meeting Hank Pellissier joined us as Managing Director with a fresh, Bay area, Web 3.0 approach to increasing the visibility of the IEET’s work. Over the last year Hank recruited dozens of new writers and thinkers, such as Dick Pelletier, Piero Scaruffi, Evan Selinger, Rachel Armstrong and Valerie Tarico, and boosted our web traffic to the level of major Washington D.C. thinktanks with thousands of times our budget.  Thanks to Hank’s efforts in just ten months we published more articles (731), put up more video and audio links (517), and signed on more new contributors (67) than we had published, posted and signed in all of 2010 and 2011.  We began publishing short science fiction exploring our themes and issues, while our active community of commenters grew as well, requiring the adoption of a Right Speech policy to ensure civil discourse, moderated by members Reverand Alex McGilvery and Peter Wicks. Hank launched our project to collect cell phones to send to Madagascar, and started planning for a volume on technoprogressive approaches to African futures.

Hank was also a very popular writer. I don’t want to ruin the countdown of our top articles for the year, but suffice it to say that essays Hank wrote for the IEET will be among the most widely read for 2012 as they were for 2011. Since our mission is the cultivation and amplification of technoprogressive public intellectuals, even when they are our own staff, we were bittersweet about Hank’s decision to spin off and start his own Transhumanity website in October of this year. But we are already finding synergies in our new relationship.

We are fortunate however that a former intern and aspiring philosophy graduate student, Kris Notaro, was very eager to jump into Hank’s shoes. Kris has been a political activist in a number of progressive movements, and is very familiar with the world of policy-oriented nonprofit organizations. Unlike our previous managing directors he lives nearby here in Connecticut which comes in handy for meeting face-to-face, and for our upcoming Personhood conference at Yale University April 26-28. We will be roaring out of the gate to build that conference in the next week or so, along with our collaborators in the Nonhuman Rights Project and the Yale Bioethics Program.  Then in May we are co-sponsoring a conference at Arizona State University on the Governance of Emerging Technologies, part of ASU’s new Program on Governance of Emerging Technologies.

Meanwhile our Fellows and Affiliate Scholars have been very busy, with hundreds of speaking engagements, articles and books. The Chair of the IEET Board of Directors, George Dvorsky, joined the staff of the website, and has been writing up a storm there on many topics of IEET concern. Among the books produced by IEETers this year there were works on biopolitics such as Martine Rothblatt’s From Transgender to Transhuman and Art Caplan’s Smart Mice, Not-So-Smart People; books on futurism such as Doug Rushkoff’s Present Shock, Ayesha Khanna’s Hybrid Reality, Marshall Brain’s Manna: Two Visions of Humanity’s Future; and speculative fiction such as David Brin’s Existence, Ramez Naam’s Nexus, and Marcelo Rinesi’s Time of Punishment, as well as Andy Miah’s The Olympics, Milan Ćirković’s The Astrobiological Landscape and Russell Blackford’s Freedom of Religion and the Secular State.  (Now that I’m finally an empty nester I’m hoping to finish Cyborg Buddha, for realz.)

After the Personhood conference Kris, Marcelo and I have been talking about the opening we perceive for pushing forward the conversation about structural unemployment and the need for a basic income guarantee. The Right wants to whittle away at the safety net and impose more austerity, while automation, globalization and demographics continue to push down the proportion of people in the industrialized world who can find paid employment. It is time to begin talking about a model for fair and sustainable economic growth that ensures technological innovation without widespread impoverishment.

We appreciate your previous support, and look forward to working with you in 2013.

James J. Hughes Ph.D.        Kris Notaro         Marcelo Rinesi
Executive Director         Managing Director     Assistant Director


“And angry that the balance of forces in American politics has prevented us from having the simple and effective public policies around guns and mental health that have kept the incidence of gun violence and mass killings lower in other industrialized countries.”

But the balance of forces in US politics derives from the same as the killings themselves: not superficial but, rather, integral to what we are as Americans. Our outmoded politics are what they are supposed to be under our system (if it is actually a ‘system’). Thus for starters the entire Constitution has to be revamped or discarded.

... the following is the second amendment to the Constitution,

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

How is the above 21st century? We don’t know what to do so we acquiesce: the outcome in this case is more school, and other, massacres. I don’t think for a nanosecond that Newtown is the final one.

So we either tolerate the status quo—are apologists for it—or we facilitate radical-yet-peaceful change. Naturally, changing laws is nothing, minds have to be changed away from thinking anyone has the right to own weapons and destroy anybody who gets in the way.. such is the commonplace American concept of the right to bear arms. It flows from our legacy as colonies beginning around the 1660s with recurring ‘Indian’ wars; then, two hundred years later, occurred the Civil War and afterwards more fighting with natives until the end of the 19th century.

Well said. Changing minds and memes lies at the heart of radical change in social philosophy. Although you need not ditch the “sacred” constitution, it merely needs a further 21st century amendment? In fact, that paragraph may still stand as important for any ideals towards US devolution and state independence? Organised militia and right to bear arms as final jurisdiction in political failure, discord and impasse concerning oppression and freedoms?


1. Stop? No, ease this propagation of blockbuster, block-blasting, Hollywood movies bonanza, (supported by the NRA?) and this applies “world wide” to movie violence. Seems every promising future vision for Humanity has to involve killing, shooting, betrayal and double-cross as sub plot, (lest punters get bored or confused?)


Get some celebs on board to speak out and speak up, there’s plenty out there? I’m not talking Clint or Arnold. Grimer wormtongue politics no longer convinces, yet still confuses, defers and obscures?

“While you were sleeping”..

Wow! See? Ideas and memes propagate even whilst half the globe slumbers? There is no such thing as an original idea they say? Ideas simply infuse, coalesce and infiltrate? Teach me for sleeping without my tin foil hat?

This movement needs inertia and momentum?

World Bank -

“Even before the financial crisis, the world was facing a job crisis. Jobs will remain at the center of the policy debate in the near future for five main reasons..  “

YOUR COMMENT Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: #11 How to build a Dyson sphere in five (relatively) easy steps

Previous entry: Small Machines, Big Power, Dangerous Minds