IEET > Directors > George Dvorsky > HealthLongevity
Ancient Campfires May Have Unleashed Humanity’s Top Bacterial Killer
George Dvorsky   Aug 10, 2016   Gizmodo  

The ability to control fire brought our ancestors countless benefits, but as a new study by Australian researchers suggests, it may have also triggered the spread of one of the worst blights to afflict our species: tuberculosis.

Mathematical biologist Mark Tanaka from the University of New South Wales hypothesizes that controlled fire use in early humans created the perfect conditions for tuberculosis to mutate from a harmless soil bacterium into our top microbial killer. In a paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Tanaka suggests that campfires brought more people together and contributed to smoke-damaged lungs— factors that increased the likelihood of tuberculosis making the leap to ancient humans and then spreading within the population.

Tuberculosis emerged as an ancient human disease thousands of years ago, but scientists aren’t entirely sure when or how it happened. It’s generally agreed that TB emerged in Africa thousands of years ago, first establishing itself in human populations, and then spreading from humans to animals (oops, our bad). TB, which is spread through the air, is caused by theMycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and most commonly affects the lungs. Today, it’s responsible for nearly 1.5 million deaths each year, making it the top bacterial killer of humans. And if Tanaka’s new theory is correct, we have campfires to blame.

“When fire was controlled around 400,000 years ago in human populations, probably cultural practices changed, so there would have been increases in social interactions, increases in population density and increased time for interaction into the night,” Tanaka told Australia’s ABC News.

Normally, bacteria found in the soil can’t make the leap from ground-dwelling organism to one that can thrive in the human body. To do so, it has to undergo a mutation that allows it to work within the biological system of another species. This happens exceptionally rarely, but it does happen. In addition to this fortuitous mutation, it also has to spread to a host and then propagate from there.

The only reasonable way for this to happen—outside of freakish luck—is for humans to develop an increased susceptibility to the microbe, contract the mutated microbe, and then spread the disease within the population. Campfires, argues Tanaka, provided these opportunities.

“You get multiple sporadic cases, and most of them fail in the sense that they fail to evolve and so there are multiple failed chains of transmission, but eventually the right mutations come along and the whole thing is triggered,” he told ABC News. Tanaka’s mathematical model shows how an otherwise harmless bacterium like M. tuberculosis is capable of developing into a transmissible pathogen. It’s not definitive proof, but it’s an intriguing possibility.

An interesting ramification of this study is the association of new technologies with the emergence of pathogens. As Tanaka and his colleagues aptly conclude in their study, “Our results have serious and cautionary implications for the emergence of new infectious diseases—feedback between cultural innovation and alteration of living conditions can catalyze unexpected changes with potentially devastating consequences lasting thousands of years.”

[PNAS via ABC News]

George P. Dvorsky serves as Chair of the IEET Board of Directors and also heads our Rights of Non-Human Persons program. He is a Canadian futurist, science writer, and bioethicist. He is a contributing editor at io9 — where he writes about science, culture, and futurism — and producer of the Sentient Developments blog and podcast. He served for two terms at Humanity+ (formerly the World Transhumanist Association). George produces Sentient Developments blog and podcast.



COMMENTS No comments

YOUR COMMENT Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Taming the Human Data Stream

Previous entry: Karen Levy on the Rise of Intimate Surveillance