IEET > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > J. Hughes > Futurism
Millennial Tendencies in Responses to Apocalyptic Threats

Abstract: Popular discussion of utopian possibilities and apocalyptic risks from new technologies is sometimes dismissed as ungrounded millennial hysteria. In this essay I reflect on the various types of historic, pancultural millennialism. I then suggest how contemporary forms of secular techno-utopian and techno-apocalyptic discourse reflect these millennialist types and their characteristic biases to over- or under-estimate catastrophic risks, and adopt fatalistic or inappropriate stances toward risk reduction. Then I suggest that awareness of these characteristic millennialist cognitive biases help us separate grounded assessments of catastrophic risks from their attendant psycho-cultural baggage. By carefully parsing our hopes and fears about the future from the characteristic dysfunctions of millennialism we can tap millennialism’s energy without being led astray by it. (Download the chapter PDF and the Powerpoint presentation from the July 2008 Catastrophic Risks Conference at Oxford University )

James Hughes Ph.D., the Executive Director of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, is a bioethicist and sociologist who serves as the Associate Provost for Institutional Research, Assessment and Planning for the University of Massachusetts Boston. He is author of Citizen Cyborg and is working on a second book tentatively titled Cyborg Buddha. From 1999-2011 he produced the syndicated weekly radio program, Changesurfer Radio. (Subscribe to the J. Hughes RSS feed)



COMMENTS

Thanks for posting this, James. I particularly enjoyed the analysis in the last section, and agree with the four risks (in two dimensions) you identified.

YOUR COMMENT Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Russell’s new book project, Voices of Disbelief

Previous entry: Linda’s Review of Dyson in Nature Biotechnology