Nukes vs. Wood Fires
Mike Treder
2006-11-01 00:00:00
URL




A recent news story says "Wood stoves are big culprits in climate change":



Cooking stoves fuelled by wood or crop residue are contributing to climate change significantly more than expected, say researchers.

Scientists have found that smoke produced by these stoves, which are traditionally used for cooking and heating in developing countries, contains twice as many soot particles as laboratory experiments had previously indicated.

When released into the atmosphere, the black, noxious particles — which are darker than those produced by grassland or forest fires — absorb light and increase atmospheric temperatures. . .

[B]urning firewood produces 800,000 metric tons of soot worldwide a year.

By comparison, diesel vehicles generate about 890,000 metric tons of soot a year. Both sources together contribute 10 per cent of the soot emitted annually into the atmosphere.

It's ironic, isn't it, that easy answers like 'no nukes' and 'comforting wood fires' don't always make sense in the real world. In fact, building more modern nuclear power plants might be a sensible replacement for fossil fuels.

Of course, the most robust solutions for global energy production and for climate change remediation are likely to come from molecular manufacturing.

And for those of us who really enjoy the ambiance of a wood-burning fireplace, maybe we can have our cake and eat it too. Imagine a completely clean in-home system that could burn wood and then scrub the smoke and soot in a nano-built chimney...



One of the first products of molecular manufacturing will be efficient molecular sorting systems. It will be possible to remove the harmless and useful gases from the combustion products--perhaps using them to build the next products--and send the rest back to be re-burned.


Fireplace1

Ahh...