Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space

Design Outside the Box

Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?

History is Contingent, Built on Flukes, Accidents, and Surprises

Compassion

What Would You Say?


comments

greycat on 'Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers' (Mar 19, 2010)

Matt Brown on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)

J on 'Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World' (Mar 19, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 18, 2010)

postfuturist on 'Health Care Good, System Bad' (Mar 18, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Human Enhancement Technologies
and Human Rights


May 26-28, 2006

Stanford University Law School, Stanford, California

Schedule - Speakers - Download program
Download the poster


Sponsored by: Stanford Center for Law and the Biosciences, Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Co-Sponsors: Stanford Program in Ethics in Society, GeneForum, ExtraLife

Fred Gifford Ph.D.

Dept. of Philosophy, Michigan State University


Fred Gifford (Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh).  Dr. Gifford is Professor of Philosophy and Faculty Associate in the Center for Ethics, Humanities and the Life Sciences at Michigan State University. He regularly teaches courses in philosophy of science and technology, bioethics and research ethics. He has published several articles on research ethics, especially the ethics of randomized clinical trials. He has been a member of MSU’s IRB for many years, and he has been a member of several data and safety monitoring boards at NIH.

Ethical Issues in Enhancement Research

Assuming we will have and endorse various enhancements (in part on grounds that individuals should be able to make such choices), it will be important to have reliable evidence of their safety and efficacy.  A well-known set of principles and controversies exist concerning the ethics of human experimentation concerning the safety and efficacy of therapies: placebos, fair subject selection, worries about exploitation, barriers to consent such as the “therapeutic misconception”, etc.  The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which these insights apply as well to the context of testing the safety and efficacy of enhancement regimens.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376