Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments


comments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'No Consensus on Future of Nation-State' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'Occult America' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'What takes the place of the nation-state?' (Mar 11, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Comment on this entry

EMERGENCE - IEET News for Nov 9, 2008




November 10, 2008

Crazy time. I’m so euphoric from the outcome of the election, and excited (and anxious) to see how Obama charts his course in these challenging times.

... Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  01/11  at  10:04 AM

In my 1993 book "The Structure of Intelligence" (SOI), I presented a formal definition of intelligence as "the ability to achieve complex goals in complex environments." I then argued (among other things) that pattern recognition is the key to achieving intelligence, due to the algorithm The subtle question in this kind of definition is: How do you average over the space of goals and environments? If you average over all possible goals and environments, weighting each one by their complexity perhaps (so that success with simple goals/environments is rated higher), then you have a definition of "how generally intelligent a system is," where general intelligence is defined in an extremely mathematically inclusive way. The line of thinking I undertook in SOI was basically a reformulation in terms of "pattern theory" of ideas regarding algorithmic information and intelligence that originated with Ray Solmonoff; and Solomonoff's ideas have more recently been developed by Shane Legg and Marcus Hutter into a highly rigorous mathematical definition of intelligence. I find this kind of theory fascinating, and I'm pleased that Legg and Hutter have done a more thorough job than I did of making a fully formalized theory of this nature.

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:



Recent Entries

A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376