Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Currency Multiplicity: Social Economic Networks

#21: Your nanorobotics future: life truly becomes ‘magical’

Meaning, Value and the Collective Afterlife: Must others survive for our lives to have meaning?

From German Idealism to American Pragmatism

Torture and the Ticking Time Bomb

#22: Ray Kurzweil on Rationality and the Moral Considerability of Intelligent Machines


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

instamatic on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 18, 2014)

instamatic on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 18, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 17, 2014)

instamatic on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 17, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 16, 2014)

instamatic on 'Four questions for Social Futurists, and others' (Dec 15, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Review of Michio Kaku’s, Visions: How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st Century
Dec 15, 2014
(9156) Hits
(0) Comments

What Will Life Be Like Inside A Computer?
Dec 7, 2014
(8244) Hits
(0) Comments

Bitcoin and Science: DNA is the Original Decentralized System
Nov 24, 2014
(7658) Hits
(0) Comments

Brain, Mind, and the Structure of Reality
Nov 21, 2014
(5404) Hits
(0) Comments



Comment on this entry

I Want Autonomous Killer Drones: A Personal View


Marcelo Rinesi


Ethical Technology

December 05, 2012

They are a not a great idea in absolute terms, but they are not worse, and can be made better, than the human-in-the-loop status quo.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by CygnusX1  on  12/10  at  11:27 AM

“A more indirect argument along the same lines is that, by removing humans from the “trigger” — which these days is as digitally mediated as any program would be — there isn’t a direct focus of responsibility, which might make atrocities easier. But despite (to put a naive spin on it) official policy in developed armies, civilian collateral deaths and maiming occur all the time, and seldom if ever do the trigger-pushers, or their commanding officers, face charges. This is not to say that atrocities are ubiquitous; they aren’t, but it’s not the presence of a human pressing the trigger what limits them, or what fails when they do happen.”

“Ultimately, the problem of having a killer drone flying over your head is nothing but the problem of having a killer anything flying over your head. The fact of killing by specifically trained and organized groups of people with the explicit backing of their societies is where has always lied, and should continue to lay, the locus of ethical concern.”


The dangers are that the sanction of using drones for combat zones, and possibly even for mild civil unrest and disorder becomes commonplace? I’m not saying that it will necessarily, yet when nations or the UN send troops to control combat zones there is great political dissection of the consequences, benefits and costing of such, and where drones will be readily available and not just cost effective but “cheap”, then there may be increased use of such weapons where formally UN sanctions would customarily be applied long-term?

Think about civil unrest in the middle east, especially in Syria - it is likely that Syria would invest in these types of technology to control civil unrest, what would the UN do about that? Employ their own drones?

Also there is much monies to be had in promoting drone technology and smart weaponry, and not only are humans keen to see if these things work, proving their cost effectiveness and sustainability, (curiosity), they also want to produce more of them and sell them to nations who will readily buy them? What good is a Tomahawk cruise missile that sits on the storehouse shelf for 20 years? Answer - none. Missiles are giant fireworks for war mongers who mass produce them, then send out salespersons to sell them so they can make more, and innovate new tech and upgrades. Supply and demand, and if there isn’t any demand - generate some? It will be/is the same with drones?

Anything or any technology that makes war and combat easier further devalues all human life? One could say that an individual soldier has expert training and is thus deemed as an asset, (remember the helicopter of navy seals that was downed - how many years experience, man-hour training was lost?) yet drones do not merely trump the tragic loss of life of expert soldiers and marines? The total value calculated to apply to casualties on the other side is also lessened by degree, as drones are quickly replaceable, expendable, and can even be used for suicide runs?

168 children killed in drone strikes in Pakistan since start of campaign
“As many as 168 children have been killed in drone strikes in Pakistan during the past seven years as the CIA has intensified its secret programme against militants along the Afghan border.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/8695679/168-children-killed-in-drone-strikes-in-Pakistan-since-start-of-campaign.html


Time expenditure and strategic planning cost is minimised to the point of zero where a drone is already at site, “what do you want to do sir? we can use the drone to attack now, without a second’s thought or hesitation?” .. this is the kind of rationale leading to mistakes, casualty through friendly fire, or mistaking war correspondents and journalists for terror suspects.. etc.

There ain’t no stopping technology and smart weaponry, it’s here to stay, and it will save lives.. allied lives. Yet unbridled use of readily available and cheaply produced drones will need to be scrutinized seriously and some manner of UN conventions applied, (you can 3D print and snap together a glider now, at the combat zone - adding smart tech CPU’s should also be a whiz?)

Tased From Above! New Robot Copter To Begin Patrolling Our Skies

http://singularityhub.com/2011/08/21/tased-from-above-new-robot-copter-to-begin-patrolling-our-skies-video/






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376