Purpose of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

IEET Launching Annual Fundraiser

“I Don’t See Class”

A Fleet of Jets: A Critical Look at the Business of African Pentecostalism

Is the Ethiopian Village of Awra Amba Really a Utopia?

TranshumaNietzsche

Big-Bank Bad Guys Bully Democracy – And Blow It


ieet books

Anticipating Tomorrow’s Politics
Author
Ed. David Wood


comments

CygnusX1 on 'The Sofalarity is Near' (Apr 1, 2015)

Peter Wicks on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Apr 1, 2015)

instamatic on 'Armed with Cameras...' (Mar 31, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'The Sofalarity is Near' (Mar 31, 2015)

CygnusX1 on 'The Sofalarity is Near' (Mar 31, 2015)

rms on 'Nigerians will soon have to worry about implanted pacemaker security' (Mar 31, 2015)

rms on 'Three Tales of the DRM Curtain' (Mar 31, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


IEET Launching Annual Fundraiser
Mar 18, 2015
(3831) Hits
(0) Comments

The nanobots are coming back
Mar 10, 2015
(7476) Hits
(0) Comments

The Sofalarity is Near
Mar 30, 2015
(6684) Hits
(5) Comments

Posthumanisms: A Carnapian Experiment
Mar 19, 2015
(5852) Hits
(4) Comments



Comment on this entry

Visions of Immortality and the Death of the Eternal City


Rick Searle


Utopia or Dystopia

April 23, 2013

It was a time when the greatest power the world had yet known suffered an attack on its primary city which seemed to signal the coming of an age of unstoppable decline.The once seemingly unopposable power no longer possessed control over its borders,it was threatened by upheaval in North Africa,  unable to bring to heel the stubborn Iranians, or stem its relative decline. It was suffering under the impact of climate change, its politics infected with systemic corruption, its economy buckling under the weight of prolonged crisis.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by Eric Schulke  on  04/24  at  05:31 PM

“given the fact that such physical immortality, or something close to it, does not seem to violate any known laws of nature, then if there is not something blocking its appearance, say complexity, or more ominously, expense, we are likely to see something like the defeat of death if not in this century then in some further future that is not some inconceivable distance from us.”

Thats like a version of the basic compelling premise for why we should obviously support and help take on working for the achievement of indefinite life extension. If more people thought about that basic principle of the matter, then it seems more of them would much more readily come to support indefinite life extension, sooner than later.

“What does art mean in such a context where the world it addresses no longer exists not long after it has been made?”

Maybe cultures will adopt more timeless things into their fiber. Like the form of a rose is timeless. The symbolism of the grim reaper is timeless. The stars are timeless. The big questions about life are, like how we got here and how the universe got here, etc.





Posted by Rick Searle  on  04/25  at  12:14 PM

@Eric:

Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

I do not see any reason why indefinite life extension is impossible in a biological sense though I do think it is likely to be a much harder problem than many of its more vocal proponents would like to admit. Evidence for precisely how hard a problem it might be can I think be seen in the fact that despite what an evolutionary break out it would be for the species whose genetics were rearranged in such a way as to bring indefinite lifespan about (as long, that is, that the species could continue to reproduce) after 4 billion years of evolution no multi-cellular organism with the exception of a very peculiar species of jellyfish has figured it out. 

I think people in general are much less freaked out by talk of extending the human lifespan as they are ending human death and for good reasons. As Vinge points out in the interview I linked to in this post indefinite lifespan forces people to confront what it means to be alive and what it is to be a self. From the perspective of long periods of time none of the things you mention above actually remain timeless: the rose will evolve or be bred into something else, the grim reaper would be meaningless and the very stars in the sky would change….






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376