Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Building the Virtues Control Panel

Convergent Risk, Social Futurism, and the Wave of Change (Part 2 of 2)

Beauty Is Skin-deep—But That’s Where Genetic Engineering Is Going Next

Convergent Risk, Social Futurism, and the Wave of Change (Part 1 of 2)

American Society for Engineering Education: Why Diversity is so Important

Why there is no mind/body problem


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

CygnusX1 on 'The Problem with the Trolley Problem, or why I avoid utilitarians near subways' (Jul 28, 2014)

instamatic on 'Beauty Is Skin-deep—But That’s Where Genetic Engineering Is Going Next' (Jul 27, 2014)

instamatic on 'Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!' (Jul 27, 2014)

contraterrine on 'Radcliffe-Richards on Sexual Inequality and Justice (Part Two)' (Jul 27, 2014)

contraterrine on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 27, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'The Problem with the Trolley Problem, or why I avoid utilitarians near subways' (Jul 27, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'How do you explain consciousness?' (Jul 27, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Nanomedical Cognitive Enhancement
Jul 11, 2014
(5976) Hits
(0) Comments

Interview with Transhumanist Biohacker Rich Lee
Jul 8, 2014
(5781) Hits
(0) Comments

Virtually Sacred, by Robert Geraci – religion in World of Warcraft and Second Life
Jul 3, 2014
(4424) Hits
(0) Comments

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
Jul 5, 2014
(3675) Hits
(18) Comments



Comment on this entry

Which Contraceptive Is Best for Your Weight?


Valerie Tarico


Ethical Technology

January 26, 2013

Our ancestors struggled to get enough calories just to stay alive. But as food supplies have become reliable and rich, people around the world face the opposite problem. Now, as we try to keep our weight in a healthy range, we look at all kinds of factors: diet, exercise, sleep, supplements, meditation, hypnosis, psychotherapy, prayer, or even surgery that might help us tip the scales a little less.


...

Complete entry


COMMENTS



Posted by b.  on  01/28  at  01:31 PM

Thank you for posting. I have two thoughts.

1. I think the central tenet of the “singularity” (that humanity and technology will merge) is based on a false separation of technology and humanity. I expect this is due to a limited definition of technology that relates primarily to mechanical and electrical computational systems. I think of technology as any artificial (constructed by us) cognitive extension. According to this definition, our relation to technology is much more complex and goes back much further, as things like fire, hunting methods and language are all examples of technologies, just very old ones. When technology is considered broadly, then we must accept that humanity and technology have always been integrated, and thus that the singularity is moot. We are now, just have we always have been, changing how we think and who we are through our artifacts. Yes, there may be some changes in the matter of degree and speed, but that is occurring in a very long and old context of guiding (misguiding?) our evolution.

2. Current cognitive and neuroscience begs us to consider whether our consciousness is “real” and not some illusion resulting from a flurry of cognitive operations happening without our will or even awareness. I think we should consider our individuality with a similar view. Just as what we think of as ourselves is a mere tip of the iceberg of what are minds are actually doing, we should consider whether our individuality is independent at all. It is highly shaped, constrained and manipulated by our culture via our social relations. I would not go so far to say that individuals do not exist, but I would say that “free-will” as classically defined does not exist. We consider our individual selves as much more simplistic than they actually are. Even our bodies are more “other” than “self” considering the genetic material of the bacteria that inhabits us.

Learning is a central aspect of our contemporary times, and can be considered the internalization of skills and ideas that can be unconsciously (skillfully) applied and form the basis of our choices and actions in the world. Our learning through institutions is an indoctrination of cultural knowledge, biases and ways of constructing the world, both through our constructive perception and our artifacts. Much of this learning gets buried under so many layers of abstraction that we have little awareness of them at all, they are simply the ground of “normality” in which we find comfort and link socially. Very few of us could survive without the artifacts constructed by our huge system of production. Hardly a single person knows how to build anything without the short-cut of the output of others’ production. Imagine building a radio where you not only have to build the radio, but build all the components, and all the components of components, doing the mining and smelting yourself, all using tools made by yourself. Even if you had all the knowledge of how to do this, it would still be extremely inefficient. Our survival is inherently social, and likely always has been. As individuals we are very little. Even when we speak of the huge contributions made by individuals (eg. Einstein), those very contributions are based on a huge history of work. When considered in relation to these histories of knowledge and artifacts we are dependent on, we individually contribute very little.

Perhaps an illusion of individuality is the very cause of our modern problems of exploitation and greed. If we don’t see ourselves in a network of dependence on others, then it is only logical to exploit others for our betterment. Perhaps we will not survive as a species if we don’t take our dependence on others, and our limited value as individuals, seriously.






Add your comment here:


Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376