|
Support the IEET![]() The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future. Via PayPal
Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh? Quick overview of biopolitical points of view ![]()
![]()
Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 19, 2013) cacarr on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 19, 2013) Henry Bowers on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 18, 2013) Chrontius on 'Push-Button (3D Printing) Gunsmithing and the Long Arm of the Law' (May 18, 2013) Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 18, 2013) Subscribe to IEET News ListsDaily News FeedLongevity Dividend ListCatastrophic Risks ListBiopolitics of Popular Culture ListTechnoprogressive ListTrans-Spirit List
Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv
|
|
|

First, I want to point out that the common consensus thirty years ago was that a computer would never beat the best human. WRONG.
Second, I would like to point out that the experts surveyed almost certainly have zero knowledge of top secret government AI programs.
Third, various definitions exist for AI. The one I prefer is that human-level AI means a computer that excels beyond human ability - which means AI already exists for many areas of human ability (like chess).
Finally, I have found that even people who are familiar with AI and advanced program techniques are “homo-centric” and are bias against computer based superiority. In fact, I have found experts generally are bias against “other expert” superiority. Therefore, until an AI (or other experts) is demonstrably eating their lunch, experts will generally exhibit skepticism toward anything that challenges their superiority.