Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view









Personhood Beyond the Human Conference whats new at ieet
Abolition is Imperative in Kurzweil’s Sixth Epoch Scenario

Political Science – A Costly Misnomer

End of Eating Food

To See The Future Of Technology, Look At The People Using It For Crime

How the Catholic Bishops Outsmarted Washington Voters

Apple Pie May Be American, But Apple Computer Isn’t - Not Anymore

Backing into Eden: Chapter 1 &2 – We are Responsible / The Beasts of the Field

Futurist Jamais Cascio envisions a sustainable, resilient world

What’s the Rational Choice? Risk, Values and the Politics of Geoengineering

Prison Industrial Complex in America


ieet books

eGods: Faith versus Fantasy in Computer Gaming
Author
by William Sims Bainbridge


comments

SHaGGGz on 'Political Science – A Costly Misnomer' (May 25, 2013)

Peter Wicks on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 25, 2013)

CygnusX1 on 'Apple Pie May Be American, But Apple Computer Isn't - Not Anymore' (May 25, 2013)

Intomorrow on 'How the Catholic Bishops Outsmarted Washington Voters' (May 24, 2013)

Intomorrow on 'Will the Catholic Bishops Decide How You Die?' (May 24, 2013)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Life in the 2040s: nanofactories, flying cars, household robots, more
by Dick Pelletier
Apr 30, 2013
(6534) Hits
(1) Comments

Ten Responses to the Technological Unemployment Problem
by Jon Perry
May 1, 2013
(5596) Hits
(2) Comments

Organ, tissue replacement could end aging by mid-2020s
by Dick Pelletier
May 14, 2013
(3439) Hits
(1) Comments

Noam Chomsky on Libertarians
Andy80o
Apr 27, 2013
(3245) Hits
(15) Comments

Radical life extension: living a 1,000 year lifespan
by Dick Pelletier
May 7, 2013
(2888) Hits
(0) Comments

Imagine No Religion. On Facebook.
by Valerie Tarico
May 4, 2013
(2819) Hits
(150) Comments



IEET > Security > Resilience > SciTech > Rights > Economic > Life > Innovation > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Contributors > Andrew Maynard

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4799) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


Emerging Technologies at the World Economic Forum


Andrew Maynard
Andrew Maynard
2020 Science

Posted: Dec 2, 2010

In an interconnected world, global issues demand integrative solutions.

It’s a statement many people would agree with - in systems where associations between cause and effect are complex, you ignore synergistic inter-relationships between factors at your peril. But when it comes to technology innovation, it seems the rules don’t apply.
wef logo
This week I am at the World Economic Forum Global Agenda Councils meeting in Dubai - I’m chairing the Council on Emerging Technologies. Our task is deceptively simple: How do we as a society ensure emerging technologies support responsive, sustainable and resilient solutions to global issues, without them leading to new problems? But as we are learning, finding answers is not easy. And the first hurdle we face is convincing people of the need to think holistically about emerging technologies.

It seems that all too often for all the talk of integrative solutions to global issues, when it comes to technology innovation, integration is the last thing on people’s minds.

I was forcibly reminded of the uphill struggle we face this afternoon, listening to BBC World News presenter Nick Gowing. Gowing was moderating a debate on natural resource scarcity, to be broadcast on the BBC World Service in a few days’ time. The debate addressed a specific question: As global population rises toward 9 billion people and the demand for natural resources such as water, food, oil and minerals increases, how do we meet the challenge of making diminishing resources go further?

On the panel were Louise Arbour, President and Chief Executive Officer of the International Crisis Group (ICG); James Cameron, Vice-chairman of Climate Change Capital; He Yafel, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations; Malini Mehra, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Social Markets (CSM) and Kevin Rudd, Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs.

I was interested to see how systemic the panel’s thinking was on potential solutions, and in particular what their take was on the role of technology innovation. So I was just a little surprised when the “technology count” - the number of times that technology was raised as part of the solution to dwindling resources - came out as a resounding zero. This was a discussion on issues that are deeply influenced by technology innovation, which revolved exclusively around social, political and economic perspectives.

I was left wondering whether technology was not on the table simply because it is seen as too complex, or whether there was a naive assumption that, as crises arise, scientists and engineers will simply pull a metaphorical white rabbit out of their technology magic hat.

To be fair, the debate was specifically framed in terms of social, political and economic drivers. But I have to wonder: if integrative solutions are the key to complex and interdependent issues like resource depletion, how can we ensure that technology innovation is part of the conversation, rather than a somewhat optimistic bolt-on?

This concern is fueled by many similar experiences, and is one reason why raising awareness of the need to integrate an understanding of emerging technologies into dialogues on a multitude of global issues is high on the Council on Emerging Technologies’ agenda.

imageAnd nowhere is this more important than in responses to global risks. As society faces new systemic risks, emerging technologies have three key roles to play. They can provide tools that enable emergent risks to be monitored, tracked and better-understood; they offer potential solutions to addressing emerging issues; and they can act as agents of change which may lead to a dramatically altered risk-landscape.

But for the positive potential that is nascent in emerging technologies to be realized, integrative approaches to their development are essential. The danger of neglecting to do this is a potential failure of emerging technologies to lead to workable solutions to pressing issues. Or worse - the emergence of technologies that instead of reducing risks, lead to greater risks.

Of course, there are many discussions taking place on how emerging technologies might solve global problems. But they are usually separate from the social, economic and political factors that so often drive decision-making. And in a technologically complex and interconnected world, this is a recipe for disaster.

In moving forward, emerging technologies need to be brought in from the cold. They need to be moved up the global agenda. And they need to take their place alongside social, economic and policy factors in crafting integrative solutions to interconnected issues. Because the one thing we can be sure of is that if we don’t take an integrative approach to emerging technologies, when we most need a technology white rabbit, the hat will be empty!


I should add that even though I am the chair of the Emerging Technologies Council, these are my own views, and do not necessarily reflect those of the council.


Andrew Maynard is Director of the Risk Science Center at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4800) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: #30: Peak Oil and Climate Change — Between Too Soon and Not Soon Enough

Previous entry: #31: Your Brain On Sexual Imagery

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376