Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

A Game of Musical Chairs over Hot Coals - an analogy about employment and basic income

Human Brain 2.0 - what is the most essential upgrade? Increased Rationality, Empathy, or Happiness?

Simple Intervention Cuts Unplanned Pregnancy by Half

Basic Income Guarantee in Utrecht, The Netherlands

Basic Income: The Totally Crazy (Not Crazy) Idea

Fermi Paradox, Doomsday Argument, Simulation Hypothesis—is our view of reality seriously flawed?


ieet books

A Dangerous Master: How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control
Author
Wendell Wallach


comments

rmk948 on 'Simple Intervention Cuts Unplanned Pregnancy by Half' (Jun 29, 2015)

James McLean Ledford on 'Is Pope Francis the World’s Most Powerful Transhumanist?' (Jun 29, 2015)

Simon84 on 'I Stand With Peter Singer' (Jun 29, 2015)

rms on 'AI Will Solve Aging - it is a Tool, Not a Threat' (Jun 29, 2015)

rms on 'How To Survive the Robot Apocalypse' (Jun 29, 2015)

Random Sample on 'How To Survive the Robot Apocalypse' (Jun 28, 2015)

instamatic on 'Fort Sumter Redux: the Battle Flag and the Re-ignition of the Confederacy' (Jun 28, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Universal Basic Income—The Foundation of a Technically Advanced Society
Jun 15, 2015
(44560) Hits
(6) Comments

Should Politicians be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence? Interview with Mark Waser
Jun 12, 2015
(18537) Hits
(3) Comments

Will Artificial Intelligence be a Buddha? Is Fear of AI just a symptom of Human Self-Loathing?
Jun 17, 2015
(10818) Hits
(5) Comments

Atheism in Zambia - skeptical, rational thought in a very superstitious country
Jun 23, 2015
(9822) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Security > Eco-gov > Vision > Futurism > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (4941) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Record Battery Energy Density in Context [Updated]


Jamais Cascio
By Jamais Cascio
Open The Future

Posted: Mar 29, 2012

A tech company called Envia Systems has announced that it is able to produce rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (Li-ion, i.e., the standard kind of rechargeable batteries that go in everything from phones to electric cars) with a world-record energy density of 400 Watt-hours per kilogram! (Gigaom has lots of info, and useful background material.) Cool, right?

Yes? No?

Energy density is one of those really important concepts that not many people know about; it’s not an exaggeration to say that a viable renewable energy future depends upon boosting energy density of batteries.

But it’s hard to evaluate the importance of an announcement like this if you don’t have context, so here you go:

Okay, 400 Watt-hours per kilogram (henceforth Wh/kg) means that one kilogram of battery material will be able to pump out electricity at a level of 400 Watts for one hour.

According to Envia, the best commercially-available Li-ion battery has an energy density of around 245 Wh/kg, so this new technology almost doubles that. This is good. Moreover, most Li-ion batteries operate at about 100-150 Wh/kg. The batteries in the Nissan Leaf, for example, have an energy density of about 120 Wh/kg (24 KWh/200kg). Tripling that density would, in principle, triple the range of the Leaf, taking it from around 100 miles to around 300 miles, a range close to a typical gasoline-powered car. This is very good.

But it’s not revolutionary—it’s a (significant) incremental improvement.

That’s because, even at 400Wh/kg, batteries still don’t have an energy density anywhere close to fossil fuels.
Gasoline offers somewhere around 12,000 Wh/kg, 30x the energy density of the Envia battery technology. A Nissan Leaf with the same mass of gasoline-equivalent superbatteries would have a range of around 9,000 miles. Alternatively, to get the same 300 mile range as with the Envia batteries, the Nissan SuperLeaf would only need around 3kg of batteries.

I’m not discounting the importance of this breakthrough, not by any means, but it’s important to keep this in context. There’s a good reason why petroleum has such a hold on the world of transportation, and it’s going to take a lot more than a tripling of battery energy density to beat it. Or, more to the point, moving beyond the gasoline automobile is going to take more than simply chipping away at energy density comparisons—it’s going to take a complete re-thinking of what we mean by transportation.

[UPDATE:]


As has been pointed out to me, in comments and in direct communication (and with varying degrees of politeness), this isn’t an entirely fair comparison. It would be more accurate to compare the combination of energy density + drive efficiency.

Most standard automobiles have an average internal combustion engine efficiency of around 20%—that is, of the energy available in the fuel, about 20% is eventually translated into motive force. So that 12,000 Wh/kg is effectively “only” 2,400 Wh/kg.

Electric motors, conversely, are extremely efficient at translating available energy into motive force; at 90%, that 400 Wh/kg Envia battery is still effectively 360 Wh/kg.

So a gasoline engine system 6.67x better than the Envia, not 30x better. The difference isn’t as gobsmacking, but it’s still significant, and remains a reminder of just how far battery technology has yet to evolve.


Jamais Cascio is a Senior Fellow of the IEET, and a professional futurist. He writes the popular blog Open the Future.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (4942) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Energy density is important. But even if you have a Leaf with a 300 mile range, what really gets you is the recharge time. You can refuel your tank with gas in just a few minutes. Recharge times are typically measured in hours.

Now there are usage scenarios where that works out okay, typical commuting to work being one of them where you can recharge at night and/or while you’re at work. But trying to take a Leaf on a cross-country drive would be a non-starter.

In the end this will work out. As petroleum fuels get more expensive and electric technologies improve, electric cars will find a niche and that niche will expand. We may even pull our collective heads out and build some long-distance rail infrastructure!





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: How to build a Dyson sphere in five (relatively) easy steps

Previous entry: The Big Robot Questions

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376