Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion

Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014

Transhumanism: A Glimpse into the Future of Humanity

Brain, Mind, and the Structure of Reality

How America’s Obsession With Bad Birth Control Hurts and Even Kills Women

A decade of uncertainty in nanoscale science and engineering


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
Martine Rothblatt


comments

David Wood on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion' (Nov 23, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Summa Technologiae, Or Why The Trouble With Science Is Religion' (Nov 23, 2014)

jhughes on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

Omar Immortalist Gatti on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

Khannea Suntzu on 'Technoprogressive Declaration - Transvision 2014' (Nov 23, 2014)

Peter Wicks on 'Pastor-Turned-Atheist Coaches Secular Church Start-Ups' (Nov 23, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Why Running Simulations May Mean the End is Near
Nov 3, 2014
(20678) Hits
(14) Comments

Does Religion Cause More Harm than Good? Brits Say Yes. Here’s Why They May be Right.
Nov 18, 2014
(19196) Hits
(1) Comments

2040’s America will be like 1840’s Britain, with robots?
Oct 26, 2014
(14532) Hits
(33) Comments

Decentralized Money: Bitcoin 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0
Nov 10, 2014
(8605) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Rights > Personhood > Life > Innovation > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Contributors > Kevin LaGrandeur

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4667) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


The Persistent Peril of the Artificial Slave


Kevin LaGrandeur
By Kevin LaGrandeur
Academia.edu

Posted: Oct 16, 2012

Robots were created to perform the same jobs as slaves—jobs that are dirty, dangerous, or monotonous—thereby freeing their owners to pursue more lofty and comfortable pursuits.

In fact, as Timothy Lenoir notes, the whole field of cybernetics, which includes not just robots but also computer-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, cyborgs, and androids, “was envisioned by scientists and engineers such as Norbert Wiener, Warren McCulloch, and their colleagues at the Macy Conferences [in the 1950s] as a way to maximize human potential in a chaotic and unpredictable postwar world. They wanted to ensure a position of mastery and control removed from the noise and chaos.”

Yet mastery and control are tenuous things. A New York Times article dated 23 May 2009 and entitled “The Coming Superbrain” discusses the dream, or nightmare, of true Artificial Intelligence. No longer the realm of  science fiction, the notion that the servant-systems that we have devised, the increasingly interconnected computer and communications networks, might  spontaneously emerge as self-organizing, self-replicating, and perhaps self- aware appears to be giving Silicon Valley scientists and technology experts conflicting fits of paranoia and joy—depending on their optimism about the controllability of such servant networks. These theorists focus primarily on “strong AI” systems—systems designed to evolve and learn on their own—and believe that they will, once sufficiently developed, evolve at such an exponential rate they will eventually learn to self-replicate and to surpass humans in  intelligence and capability.

The pessimists who worry about the controllability of such systems are numerous, perhaps because so much of the cutting-edge work in AI is funded by the military; and in fact, any truly intelligent artificial servant is most likely to arise from the search for automated weaponry. P.W. Singer points out that  not only is the military the source of most of the money for AI research, but it  has the strong investment motive of the recent wars in the Middle East as well as the most extensive integrative capacity for such research, having already established a network of defense research contractors. Armin Krishnan, in his book about military robotics, concurs with Singer, explaining the dilemma behind this situation:

To Read the Rest of the Essay, with Notes and References CLICK HERE


IEET Fellow Kevin LaGrandeur is a Faculty Member at the New York Institute of Technology. He specializes in the areas of technology and culture, digital culture, philosophy and literature.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4668) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Using Neurotechnologies to Develop Virtues - A Buddhist Approach to Cognitive Enhancement (Part 1)

Previous entry: How To Make a Spy Exhibit Boring

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376