Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Brexit for Transhumanists: A Parable for Getting What You Wish For

How we’re harnessing nature’s hidden superpowers

The era of personal DNA testing is here

What democracy’s future shouldn’t be

IEET Scholars Cited in New Book ‘The Posthuman Body in Superhero Comics’

Why the Human Lifespan Ends at 122

ieet books

Philosophical Ethics: Theory and Practice
John G Messerly


RJP8915 on 'Brexit for Transhumanists: A Parable for Getting What You Wish For' (Oct 21, 2016)

instamatic on 'What democracy’s future shouldn’t be' (Oct 20, 2016)

instamatic on 'Is the internet killing democracy?' (Oct 17, 2016)

RJP8915 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 17, 2016)

Nicholsp03 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 17, 2016)

RJP8915 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 16, 2016)

Nicholsp03 on 'The Ethics of a Simulated Universe' (Oct 16, 2016)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Here’s Why The IoT Is Already Bigger Than You Realize
Sep 26, 2016
(5911) Hits
(1) Comments

IEET Fellow Stefan Sorgner to discuss most recent monograph with theologian Prof. Friedrich Graf
Oct 3, 2016
(3965) Hits
(0) Comments

Space Exploration, Alien Life, and the Future of Humanity
Oct 4, 2016
(3942) Hits
(1) Comments

All the Incredible Things We Learned From Our First Trip to a Comet
Oct 6, 2016
(3020) Hits
(0) Comments

IEET > Security > Military > Resilience > SciTech > Life > Vision > Affiliate Scholar > Seth Baum

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4156) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Analyzing and reducing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war between the United States and Russia

Seth Baum
By Seth Baum
Ethical Technology

Posted: Jan 10, 2013

This paper develops a mathematical modeling framework using fault trees and Poisson processes for analyzing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war from U.S. or Russian misinterpretation of false alarms in early warning systems, and for assessing the potential value of inadvertence risk reduction options. The model also uses publicly available information on early-warning systems, near-miss incidents, and other factors to estimate probabilities of a U.S.-Russia crisis, the rates of false alarms, and the probabilities that leaders will launch missiles in response to a false alarm. The paper discusses results, uncertainties, limitations, and policy implications.

Pre-print: Click here to view a full pre-print of the article (pdf).
Non-Technical Summary: pdf version

Background: Inadvertent Nuclear War
Inadvertent nuclear war as defined in this paper occurs when one nation mistakenly concludes that it is under attack and launches nuclear weapons in what it believes to be a counterattack. A US-Russia nuclear war would be a major global catastrophe since these countries still possess thousands of nuclear weapons. Despite the end of the Cold War, the risk remains. This paper develops a detailed mathematical "fault tree" model to analyze the ongoing risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war.

The Fault Tree Model
A fault tree is a scheme for modeling events and conditions that could result in some final event. Here, the final event is inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. Initial events could include research rockets, as in the 1995 Norwegian rocket incident, faulty computer chips, wild animal activity, and nuclear terrorist attacks. The nation that detects the initial event, US or Russia, then goes through decision procedures to evaluate the event and decide whether to launch nuclear weapons in response. The model takes data on the probabilities of initial events going through the decision procedures to calculate the probability of the final event. Different data is used during conditions of low or high US-Russia tensions. During high tensions, weapons launch is more likely because the initial event is more likely to be interpreted as a real attack instead of a false alarm.

Annual Probability of Inadvertent US-Russia Nuclear War
The paper calculates the annual probability of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war, meaning the probability of the war occurring during the course of a year. While much remains uncertain, the paper finds that there may still be significant risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. This general finding holds even if there are fewer initial false alarm events than there were during the Cold War. The finding also holds even if inadvertent war could only occur during high tensions, although inadvertent war is found to be more likely if it could also occur during low tensions.

Options For Risk Reduction
The paper considers two options for reducing the risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. First, each nation's submarines with nuclear weapons could be moved further from the other's border, to give the other nation more time to decide if an initial event is a real submarine-launched attack or a false alarm. Second, the nations could lower their level of alert for part of the time, so that they will be less likely to conclude that an initial event is an attack. Both options were found to reduce the risk of inadvertent nuclear war. However, before recommending these options, further analysis is needed to assess the effects they have on other risks, including intentional (non-inadvertent) nuclear war.

Series of steps to evaluate whether the initial event is an attack or a false alarm. Note this figure is for the US. The paper assumes that Russia's procedures are similar.

The full fault tree.

Seth Baum( is Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ( He received a PhD in Geography from Pennsylvania State University and was recently a post-doc with Columbia University's Center for Research on Environmental Decisions.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (4157) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Global Risks 2013 Report - Overview Film

Previous entry: Landform Building


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @