Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Is Effective Regulation of AI Possible? Eight Potential Regulatory Problems

Buddhism vs. Utilitarianism - two paths that seek to abolish suffering

The “God Helmet” Can Give You Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences

Here’s What Brian Greene’s Gut is Telling Him About Intelligent Life in the Universe

Robosapiens – merging with machines will improve humanity at an exponential rate

The why and how of effective altruism


ieet books

The Future of Business
Author
Ed. Rohit Talwar


comments

dobermanmac on 'Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now' (Jul 6, 2015)

rmk948 on 'Condoms are So Hundred Years Ago: Why Better Birth Control for Men Would Be Better for Everyone' (Jul 5, 2015)

Vinayagamoorthy on 'Practopoiesis: How Cybernetics of Biology can Help AI' (Jul 5, 2015)

vanillahaze on 'Condoms are So Hundred Years Ago: Why Better Birth Control for Men Would Be Better for Everyone' (Jul 4, 2015)

Valkyrie Ice on 'Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now' (Jul 4, 2015)

spud100 on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

Alexey Turchin on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Universal Basic Income—The Foundation of a Technically Advanced Society
Jun 15, 2015
(48353) Hits
(6) Comments

Should Politicians be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence? Interview with Mark Waser
Jun 12, 2015
(19474) Hits
(3) Comments

Will Artificial Intelligence be a Buddha? Is Fear of AI just a symptom of Human Self-Loathing?
Jun 17, 2015
(11337) Hits
(5) Comments

Split the Earth: 50% for Humans, 50% for Protected Biodiversity Zones
Jun 21, 2015
(10588) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Security > Military > Resilience > SciTech > Life > Vision > Affiliate Scholar > Seth Baum

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (3373) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Analyzing and reducing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war between the United States and Russia


Seth Baum
By Seth Baum
Ethical Technology

Posted: Jan 10, 2013

This paper develops a mathematical modeling framework using fault trees and Poisson processes for analyzing the risks of inadvertent nuclear war from U.S. or Russian misinterpretation of false alarms in early warning systems, and for assessing the potential value of inadvertence risk reduction options. The model also uses publicly available information on early-warning systems, near-miss incidents, and other factors to estimate probabilities of a U.S.-Russia crisis, the rates of false alarms, and the probabilities that leaders will launch missiles in response to a false alarm. The paper discusses results, uncertainties, limitations, and policy implications.

Pre-print: Click here to view a full pre-print of the article (pdf).
Non-Technical Summary: pdf version

Background: Inadvertent Nuclear War
Inadvertent nuclear war as defined in this paper occurs when one nation mistakenly concludes that it is under attack and launches nuclear weapons in what it believes to be a counterattack. A US-Russia nuclear war would be a major global catastrophe since these countries still possess thousands of nuclear weapons. Despite the end of the Cold War, the risk remains. This paper develops a detailed mathematical "fault tree" model to analyze the ongoing risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war.

The Fault Tree Model
A fault tree is a scheme for modeling events and conditions that could result in some final event. Here, the final event is inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. Initial events could include research rockets, as in the 1995 Norwegian rocket incident, faulty computer chips, wild animal activity, and nuclear terrorist attacks. The nation that detects the initial event, US or Russia, then goes through decision procedures to evaluate the event and decide whether to launch nuclear weapons in response. The model takes data on the probabilities of initial events going through the decision procedures to calculate the probability of the final event. Different data is used during conditions of low or high US-Russia tensions. During high tensions, weapons launch is more likely because the initial event is more likely to be interpreted as a real attack instead of a false alarm.

Annual Probability of Inadvertent US-Russia Nuclear War
The paper calculates the annual probability of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war, meaning the probability of the war occurring during the course of a year. While much remains uncertain, the paper finds that there may still be significant risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. This general finding holds even if there are fewer initial false alarm events than there were during the Cold War. The finding also holds even if inadvertent war could only occur during high tensions, although inadvertent war is found to be more likely if it could also occur during low tensions.

Options For Risk Reduction
The paper considers two options for reducing the risk of inadvertent US-Russia nuclear war. First, each nation's submarines with nuclear weapons could be moved further from the other's border, to give the other nation more time to decide if an initial event is a real submarine-launched attack or a false alarm. Second, the nations could lower their level of alert for part of the time, so that they will be less likely to conclude that an initial event is an attack. Both options were found to reduce the risk of inadvertent nuclear war. However, before recommending these options, further analysis is needed to assess the effects they have on other risks, including intentional (non-inadvertent) nuclear war.


Series of steps to evaluate whether the initial event is an attack or a false alarm. Note this figure is for the US. The paper assumes that Russia's procedures are similar.


The full fault tree.


Seth Baum(http://sethbaum.com) is Co-Founder and Executive Director of the Global Catastrophic Risk Institute (http://gcrinstitute.org). He received a PhD in Geography from Pennsylvania State University and was recently a post-doc with Columbia University's Center for Research on Environmental Decisions.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (3374) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Global Risks 2013 Report - Overview Film

Previous entry: Landform Building

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376