Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Fairness on the Public Airwaves

10 Reasons Popular Versions of Christian Heaven Would be Hell

Time to Start Looking At ‘Cyborg’ As a Gender Identity

Substrate Autonomous, Networked Avatar Bodies by Design

The Continuum Hypothesis and the search for Mathematical Infinity (1hr)

What are the limits of mathematical explanation? (25min)


ieet books

How “God” Works: A Logical Inquiry on Faith
Author
Marshall Brain


comments

CygnusX1 on 'Can We Avoid a Surveillance State Dystopia?' (Jan 30, 2015)

instamatic on 'If There Are Gods, They Are Evil' (Jan 29, 2015)

Lincoln Cannon on 'The End of Religion Misrecognized' (Jan 29, 2015)

Pastor_Alex on 'If There Are Gods, They Are Evil' (Jan 29, 2015)

kddubb on 'The End of Religion Misrecognized' (Jan 29, 2015)

CygnusX1 on 'Cosmic Evolution and the Meaning of Life' (Jan 29, 2015)

instamatic on 'If There Are Gods, They Are Evil' (Jan 28, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Bad luck and cancer – did the media get it wrong?
Jan 3, 2015
(18358) Hits
(5) Comments

The End of Religion: Technology and the Future
Jan 24, 2015
(14649) Hits
(5) Comments

Religion’s Smart-People Problem
Jan 1, 2015
(7333) Hits
(3) Comments

#2 Editor’s Choice Award: 2040’s America will be like 1840’s Britain, with robots?
Jan 9, 2015
(6389) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Life > Access > Trustees > Arthur Caplan

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (4323) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Right to reform


Arthur Caplan
By Arthur Caplan
Journal of Clinical Investigation

Posted: Oct 3, 2009

I am often asked what is the single most important issue that needs to be resolved in order to insure that health care reform moves forward in America. The answer is actually quite simple. If the key reason to reform the health care system is to extend health insurance coverage to the tens of millions of Americans who have none, then all those promoting reform but especially President Obama must drive home the ethical position that health care is a right.

As the current debate over health reform shows, those who oppose change argue that health reform cannot work because reform is not practical due to “the details.” A larger load of baloney masquerading as an argument is hard to imagine.

Health reform is not in the details. Think I am wrong? How far did we get this summer wallowing around in claims about co-ops, public plans, death panels, rationing, and cost savings?

Health reform is in the ethics. It will only occur if those who favor it can win the fight to recognize a right to health care. If health care is recognized as a right, then the details of how to achieve affordable health insurance reform will follow. If it is not, then efforts to move reform forward will simply die under the weight of nitpicking, fear-mongering, sloganeering, and the invocation of details as obstructions to change.

Read the rest: Full text | PDF


Arthur L. Caplan, Ph.D., is the Drs. William F and Virginia Connolly Mitty Professor and head of the Division of Bioethics at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York City.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (4324) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


“As the current debate over health reform shows, those who oppose change argue that health reform cannot work because reform is not practical due to “the details.” “

Since the opposers don’t like “the details,” (even if they’re mistaken in focusing on details) it is clear that we’re not talking about people who “oppose change” but people who “oppose /Obama’s version/ of change.”





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Stefano Vaj and the Complicated Politics of Italian Transhumanism

Previous entry: Idealism Meets Realism: Tackling Chronic Disease Via Age Retardation

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376