Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

The Simulated Future

Stambler, de Grey @ Super Longevity Conference

IEET Audience Divided on Minimum Wage and Technological Unemployment

Visibility of IEET Jumps This Week

Virtual Reality and Reality Augmentation

A Techno-Optimist Movement: For an Evenly Distributed Future

ieet books

Surviving AI: The promise and peril of artificial intelligence
Calum Chace


CygnusX1 on 'The Simulated Future' (Oct 4, 2015)

etienne thillaye on 'Egalitarianism is not Radical' (Oct 3, 2015)

hankpellissier on 'Transhumanist Petition to Disavow Zoltan Istvan Candidacy for US Presidency' (Oct 3, 2015)

Rick Searle on 'How Nature Plays the Lottery' (Oct 3, 2015)

instamatic on 'Envy of the Future' (Oct 2, 2015)

AlonzoTG on 'Technology and Human Dignity' (Oct 2, 2015)

Giulio Prisco on 'The Marxist and Christian Roots of Transhumanism' (Oct 2, 2015)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

Seven Emerging Technologies That Will Change the World Forever
Sep 29, 2015
(104824) Hits
(4) Comments

The price of the Internet of Things will be a vague dread of a malicious world
Sep 25, 2015
(23934) Hits
(3) Comments

This Artificially Intelligent Boss Means the Workplace Will Never Be the Same
Sep 18, 2015
(16426) Hits
(1) Comments

Religion and Superintelligence
Sep 12, 2015
(8356) Hits
(0) Comments

IEET > Security > Biosecurity > Life > Vision > Fellows > Jamais Cascio

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (2683) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Shaping the Anthropocene: Cascio on Climate Change

Jamais Cascio
By Jamais Cascio
Ethical Technology

Posted: Feb 13, 2013

One of the unfortunate truths of the climate crisis we’re in is that when we finally stop making things worse, it won’t suddenly make things better. The carbon dioxide we’ve put into the atmosphere and the oceans will persist for hundreds, even thousands of years; temperatures will remain high; many ecosystems will be permanently disrupted; and species driven to extinction—well, they’ll still be extinct. The eventual return to a planetary equilibrium won’t happen on anything approaching a human timescale.

This isn’t a story we like to hear. The heroic narrative of fighting global warming implies that victory will mean getting back the Earth we know and love. But the reality of the situation is that significant damage has already been done; putting a stop to carbon emissions still leaves us with a planetary mess.

It’s useful to consider the alternatives we’ll have when the time comes to start the cleanup. It may seem premature to be talking about what to do after we’ve put an end to using the atmosphere and ocean as a carbon dump, but it’s often useful to consider one’s eventual destination even when still trying to figure out the map. When that time comes, we’ll face a choice between trying to accelerate the return to the equilibrium the world has known for millennia, trying to adapt ourselves and our environment to the new normal, or simply adapting ourselves and letting the new environmental conditions evolve on their own. It’s a sobering set of options.

Accelerating the return to equilibrium would mean, at a minimum, direct intervention to reduce atmospheric and oceanic carbon loads; it would also likely require some effort to moderate temperatures at a planetary scale (aka geoengineering). A true return to equilibrium would come to depend on programs such as Stewart Brand and Ryan Phelan’s proposal to revive extinct species, and would necessitate extraordinary research into the nature of re-creating ecosystems, including everything from pollinating insects to soil microbes. It would be a massive undertaking and, to be clear, would not result in a return to pre-Anthropocene (or even pre-Industrial Age) conditions—too many species have been lost, and too many ecosystem changes are irreversible. Call this the “(Re)Terraforming” future—using every tool at our disposal to make the Earth Earth-like again.

None of these scenarios should sound especially appealing. We left the appealing scenarios behind decades ago.

Less ambitious (in comparison, at least) would be to attempt large-scale adaptation of environmental and human systems to high-temperature conditions. This would mean reimagining the nature of cities and buildings, a transformation of the typical diet and—most profoundly—the genetic manipulation of many plants and animals to better withstand higher temperatures and persistent drought. Any reintroduction of extinct or near-extinct plants and animals would demand close scrutiny of ecological requirements and genetic options; it’s likely we’d see large-scale experiments in the creation of novel, even unprecedented, ecosystems. We could call this one the “Anthropoforming” future—using our tools to make the Anthropocene easier to survive.

Finally, there’s the hands-off approach, sometimes called “re-wilding.” Human adaptation would take place in ways that parallel the previous scenario, but natural ecosystems are left to themselves. Certainly, permitting the return of the wild by pulling back the boundaries of civilization has some visceral appeal. It’s letting nature take over again, and puts explicit limits on the human footprint. What often goes unsaid, however, is that the new wild would bear little resemblance to what had been there previously; with the impacts of changing temperatures and corresponding ecosystem disruption, we’re more likely to see the quick dominance of opportunistic, invasive species. We’d call this the “Hands-Off” future, although re-wilding through abandonment might also be thought of as the “rats and kudzu” future.

Thinking now about these options would let us focus our research accordingly. Do we undertake extensive study of how ecosystems operate, and what can be done to create them? Do we attempt a planet-wide genome map as the first step in adaptive modification? Or do we focus our attention on human adaptation to a world with greatly constrained resources and minimally diverse ecosystems?

None of these scenarios should sound especially appealing. We left the appealing scenarios behind decades ago. But these three do sketch out the possibilities that await us. Getting control of global carbon emissions isn’t the end of the story—it’s just the beginning of the next chapter.

Jamais Cascio is a Senior Fellow of the IEET, and a professional futurist. He writes the popular blog Open the Future.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (2684) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: 3D printing and tissue engineering

Previous entry: The end of ID and credit card safety? Must e-commerce be destroyed?


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-297-2376

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @