Support the IEET

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Nick Bostrom Testifies on Cognitive Enhancement for Obama BRAIN Initiative

Advanced Materials – What’s the big deal?

Ontological Realism and Creating the One Real Future

Indefinite Lifespan and Risk Aversion: A Short-Lived Problem

Intracortical Recording Devices

On Parfit’s view that we are not Human Beings (50 min)

ieet books

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
by Nick Bostrom


CygnusX1 on 'Ontological Realism and Creating the One Real Future' (Aug 22, 2014)

Stefano Vaj on 'Indefinite Lifespan and Risk Aversion: A Short-Lived Problem' (Aug 22, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Why archaeologists make better futurists than science-fiction writers' (Aug 22, 2014)

dobermanmac on 'Indefinite Lifespan and Risk Aversion: A Short-Lived Problem' (Aug 22, 2014)

Eric Schulke on 'How would you spend $5k to spread info & raise awareness about indefinite life extension?' (Aug 22, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Why archaeologists make better futurists than science-fiction writers' (Aug 21, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Why archaeologists make better futurists than science-fiction writers' (Aug 21, 2014)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

What is the Difference between Posthumanism and Transhumanism?
Jul 28, 2014
(7724) Hits
(6) Comments

Enhancing Virtues: Self-Control and Mindfulness
Aug 19, 2014
(6294) Hits
(0) Comments

Is using nano silver to treat Ebola misguided?
Aug 16, 2014
(5204) Hits
(0) Comments

High Tech Jainism
Aug 10, 2014
(4959) Hits
(5) Comments

IEET > Rights > Economic > Life > Access > Enablement > Health > Contributors > Lee-Roy Chetty

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2310) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

Primary education variables in the Developing world

Lee-Roy Chetty
Lee-Roy Chetty
Ethical Technology

Posted: Jan 25, 2013

In a number of developing countries, the relationship between increased resource allocation to the education sector and improved education outcomes is fairly weak. A major finding is that “traditional” education inputs fail to yield the expected positive influence.

The standard conceptual approach usually entails specification of a technical relationship in the form of production functions, whereby an institution (such as a primary school) is seen as analogous to a firm, transforming inputs into outputs through a production process.

Typical inputs in the education production function at the primary level include government expenditures on teaching and the learning atmosphere, especially where the major output is defined in terms of pupils’ numeracy and literacy.

Certain primary educational practitioners have argued that where the relationship exists and can be quantified, policy can be constructed to maximize a preferred conceptual outcome. Indeed, considerable empirical research in this area has focused on identifying this technical relationship.

Nonetheless, the overwhelming literature on the subject of primary education points to the failure of education production functions to identify the purported/perceived relationship between key policy variables (such as resource spending) and educational achievement.

Two explanations for the failure of education production functions have been proposed.

These include the validity of the educational production function framework itself and the possibility of econometric misspecification; and the possibility that public policy may not have a measurable impact on educational outcome.

For example, some contended that innate ability combined with socio-economic background, may be more important in the educational production process.

Others have sought to define various dimensions of quality education. For example, a study conducted by the World Bank using a comprehensive review of research, identified five principal contributors to primary education effectiveness.

These include; curriculum; learning materials; instructional time; classroom teaching; and students’ learning ability.

Moreover, despite agreement in educational circles that hardware factors are perceived as being key determinants of education outcomes, some ambiguity in the importance of this factor exists. This may be partly explained by evidence suggesting that the quality of facilities may be more important in disadvantaged settings.

The role of teachers is generally accepted as crucial to learning outcomes. In most countries, developing and industrialized, teacher salaries account for half to three-quarters of education expenditures, rising as high as 90% in some African countries. Given the magnitude of this investment, it is important to know if it affects students’ learning outcomes.

Beyond that, most studies agree that time spent on teaching is an important condition for learning. Another characteristic of high-quality schools is assignment and correction of homework.

At the international level, debate continues about the relevance of class size. Others, however, claim that gains in educational quality will be realized by reducing class size, particularly in the early grades.

Whatever the results of these studies, which predominantly consider industrialized countries, a negative effect of student numbers might be expected in Africa where the average class size in primary schools is two to three times that in Europe or the United States.

Finally, children’s personal characteristics and background affect their persistence and attainment. These variables include the child’s health and nutritional status, gender and age, and parents’ or caregivers’ attitudes and experience with school. Prior schooling such as early childhood/pre-school programs will shape the child’s response to school.

Even so, developing countries are spending heavily on inputs, based on the perception that they improve learning. Hence, more research that employs different methodologies and datasets is needed to try to establish which inputs have a positive influence on learning outcomes.

Lee-Roy Chetty holds a masters degree in media studies from the University of Cape Town and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. A two-time recipient of the National Research Fund Scholarship, he is currently completing his PhD at UCT and an economics degree with Unisa.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2311) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


In America, for every public school built, we should build a prison; for that is where our unchallenged students will land.  Success can’t be bought with materials and facilities and salaries; it takes a learned caregiver to murder the television and sit that young Mozart down.  I appreciated this article’s emphasis on “graded homework”.  In my own education, I have found the 1-1 advice of the professional to be worth all the tuition in the world.

YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: A universal translator for surgeons

Previous entry: What Sci-Fi Can Teach Us About the Present and Future of Information


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-297-2376