Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

A Note About Our Comments Policy

Do Secularists Contribute to Social Divisiveness?

Why We Need Technology Ratchets

Pushing Back Against the Methane Tipping Point

What “Irrelevance” Means and What It Doesn’t

Are atheists and liberals more “intelligent”?

No Consensus on Future of Nation-State

The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism

Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment

Future Evolution of Virtual Worlds as Communication Environments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 11, 2010)

postfuturist on 'No Consensus on Future of Nation-State' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'Occult America' (Mar 11, 2010)

Cyber-Communist on 'What takes the place of the nation-state?' (Mar 11, 2010)

Which of these four scenarios for the future of transhumanism over the next 15 or 20 years do you think is most likely?surveys

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Trans-Spirit List

Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Rights > ReproRights > Directors > George Dvorsky

Print • Email • permalink • (1) Comments • (23) Hits •

subscribe •

•

Demand for human trait selection creates a market

George Dvorsky

George Dvorsky
Sentient Developments

Posted: Feb 17, 2009

The Wall Street Journal published an article last week on the topic of human trait selection—a pending reproductive procedure that’s more commonly (and pejoratively) referred to as designer babies. In the article, “A Baby, Please. Blond, Freckles—Hold the Colic”, writer Gautam Naik describes those laboratory techniques that screen for diseases in embryos and how those techniques will soon be offered to prospective parents.

Click for larger image; credit: Wall Street Journal

As previously noted here on Sentient Developments, demand for the non-medical application of PGD, while small, does exist and it’s increasing. As Jeff Steinberg of LA’s Fertility Institutes says, “This is cosmetic medicine…Others are frightened by the criticism but we have no problems with it.” Trait selection in babies “is a service,” says Dr. Steinberg, and “[w]e intend to offer it soon.”

The WSJ article prompted Kathryn Hinsch of the Women’s Bioethics Project to respond with a list of reasons why human trait selection is an important topic today:

It’s a hive of ethical issues
The technology isn’t here yet
We all have a stake in the issue
Questions raised go beyond designer babies

”I love the topic of designer babies,” writes Hinsch, “because difficult questions need to be asked about all kinds of emerging technologies from nanotechnology to therapeutic and reproductive human cloning.” It can be overwhelming, she ways, “but the only thing we can count on is change–that the nature of the technology will evolve while the challenges remain.”

According to Hinsch there are some key questions that need to be answered as we move forward:

Should we ban it?
Should we regulate the technology to allow only certain applications?
Should we promote the widespread use of this technology?

Some believe, for example, that genetic modification holds tremendous promise for preventing genetic diseases and that society should pursue policies to promote or encourage its use in the future, despite what other sideline “designer” applications are developed as a result.

There’s no question that these are challenging isues. But what’s important right now, argues Hinsch, is that we get the conversation started.

George Dvorsky serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. George is the Director of Operations for Commune Media, an advertising and marketing firm that specializes in marketing science. George produces Sentient Developments blog and podcast.

Print • Email • permalink • Discuss in Forums • Send to: ¡

COMMENTS

Sonali Sahoo • Orissa • Feb 28, 2009

I like the topic "Demand for human trait selection creates a market" and the idea of designer baby. Its a very emerging idea which will surely lead to a new horizon in the reproductive biology with the colaboration with nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology. It will become now easier to make people understand the ethical issues regarding the genetic modifications. To make them aware about the plus points. counterly it should takecare about the diverisity ethics.

YOUR COMMENT

Next entry: The idiocy of "defamation of religion"

Previous entry: Inhuman Thoughts

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List

Demand for human trait selection creates a market