Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

American Society for Engineering Education: Why Diversity is so Important

Why there is no mind/body problem

Why Solitary Confinement Is The Worst Kind Of Psychological Torture

The Trifecta of Roommate Selection Technology: Privacy, Prejudice, And Diversity

The Maverick Nanny with a Dopamine Drip: Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation

Chiding CEOs at Walgreens and Other Corporate Defectors


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

instamatic on 'Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!' (Jul 25, 2014)

instamatic on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 25, 2014)

Giulio Prisco on 'Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!' (Jul 25, 2014)

Giulio Prisco on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 25, 2014)

instamatic on 'Should we have a right not to work?' (Jul 24, 2014)

instamatic on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

DrJohnty on 'LEV: The Game – Play to Win Indefinite Life' (Jul 24, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Nanomedical Cognitive Enhancement
Jul 11, 2014
(5808) Hits
(0) Comments

Interview with Transhumanist Biohacker Rich Lee
Jul 8, 2014
(5581) Hits
(0) Comments

Virtually Sacred, by Robert Geraci – religion in World of Warcraft and Second Life
Jul 3, 2014
(4273) Hits
(0) Comments

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
Jul 5, 2014
(3567) Hits
(18) Comments



IEET > Life > Access > Vision > Directors > George Dvorsky

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (3309) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Is it time we got over the taboo against human enhancement?


George Dvorsky
George Dvorsky
io9

Posted: Apr 8, 2013

Slate writer Will Oremus has put together a fairly revealing article about how easy it’s becoming to supercharge our brains, prompting him to wonder why there’s still so much push-back against the idea of technologically enhancing ourselves.

The focus of Oremus’s article is on the surprising benefits that can be gleaned from transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS). This is the technology where an electrode is attached to one side of the scalp (above the part of the brain that’s being stimulated) with the other placed on the opposite side to complete the circuit. All it takes is a milliampere or two to get noticeable results.

And the results are quite remarkable. Depending on where the electrodes are attached, improvements have been chronicled in learning and working memory. It can raise a person’s threshold for pain and make their nondominant hand better. It can also facilitate language acquisition and improve numerical reasoning. Oremus points to several other cognitive benefits, and includes the remarks of a New Scientist editor who said it was “the most powerful drug I’ve ever used in my life.”

Despite his skepticism of tDCS being a “wonder tool” for cognitive enhancement, Oremus ponders the broader implications:

The fact that tDCS may pose unknown risks, that its benefits and drawbacks are not yet fully understood, that it can be dangerous in the wrong hands—none of these arguments should keep scientists from carefully exploring its potential. Having spent the better part of two months immersed in the vertiginous world of human enhancement, I’ve become convinced that societal and academic taboos against the use of technology to give healthy people extraordinary powers are, on the whole, counterproductive. College students are already popping Adderall in droves. Body hackers are implanting microchips in their bodies. Entrepreneurs are hawking tDCS kits for $99 online. Some athlete, somewhere, is probably experimenting with gene doping. The riskiness of some of these behaviors makes it tempting to simply outlaw them all and expect everyone to comply. But that’s as unrealistic as it is blinkered.

This isn’t a call to legalize everything and let God or Darwin sort ’em out. It’s a plea to lawmakers, the media, academics, and those who fund academic research to take seriously the growing availability of and demand for human-enhancement technologies. Only by acknowledging and researching their potential benefits as well as their risks can we hope to craft mature policies that promote public safety and welfare. If that means continuing to classify Adderall as a Schedule II controlled substance until we’re even more convinced that it doesn’t pose long-term health risks, so be it. But here’s where we’re going astray: One university professor who studies ADHD drugs told me he has learned that every public-health research paper “has to have a certain (cautionary) tone to it” in order to be accepted for publication. “I know what I have to write, and it has to be, basically, ‘Drugs are bad.’ ”

Maybe he’s wrong. But I’ve talked with enough academics over the past two months who flat-out refused to even discuss the potential use of various medical technologies for human enhancement—or to even have their name attached to an article that discusses them—to suspect that there’s some legitimacy to his paranoia. Too many people seem to think that humans are fine the way we are, and that the only proper use of these technologies is to restore “normal” human functions to people with disabilities.

There’s much more to this article at Slate, including lots of citations to the relevant research.

Image: Vasabii/Shutterstock; tDCS setup.

This article was originally posted at io9

 


George P. Dvorsky serves as Chair of the IEET Board of Directors and also heads our Rights of Non-Human Persons program. He is a Canadian futurist, science writer, and bioethicist. He is a contributing editor at io9 — where he writes about science, culture, and futurism — and producer of the Sentient Developments blog and podcast. He served for two terms at Humanity+ (formerly the World Transhumanist Association). George produces Sentient Developments blog and podcast.
Print Email permalink (1) Comments (3310) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Yeah, I read the article earlier, and followed the link to a website that is taking emails for a wait list when the product hits the market - at 100 $ I’ll buy at least one.  I’ve talked to a number of people about it, and most are very skeptical UNTIL you ask if you would let a chess opponent wear one when playing a tournament game, then all of a sudden they get religion.

My point is that human mechanical enhancement (my favorite is the “synthetic neocortex extender”) is most poo-pooed as gross and nonsense (like the foil hat paranoids wear sometimes), until the rubber hits the road and a practical and functional application comes around, then that tends to focus their mind.

Let me make an analogy: steroids.  Frankly, it offends me that I can’t go on a supervised steroid exercise program, but the cultural bias against “artificial” enhancement prevents even the most benign applications.  Expect big push back against any type of augmentation (unless it involves handicap people who are trying to regain function).

Of course, I’m a transhumanist, so fully expect to adopt many mechanical, chemical, and genetic enhancements as time goes on, and eventually will not resemble my younger self.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Scientology for Agent Orange Victims

Previous entry: The Transition to Transhumanism

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376