Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

The Next X Prize: Artificial Intelligence!

Sequencing the Ebola virus

The Near Future Of Implantable Technology

Future News From The Year 2137

How our police became Storm-troopers

Citizen Power - Part II: Those Cop-Cameras…


ieet books

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
Author
by Nick Bostrom


comments

instamatic on 'How our police became Storm-troopers' (Aug 30, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'How our police became Storm-troopers' (Aug 30, 2014)

Summerspeaker on 'How our police became Storm-troopers' (Aug 30, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Death Threats, Freedom, Transhumanism, and the Future' (Aug 30, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Death Threats, Freedom, Transhumanism, and the Future' (Aug 30, 2014)

Rick Searle on 'Death Threats, Freedom, Transhumanism, and the Future' (Aug 30, 2014)

CygnusX1 on 'Death Threats, Freedom, Transhumanism, and the Future' (Aug 30, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Enhancing Virtues: Self-Control and Mindfulness
Aug 19, 2014
(7781) Hits
(0) Comments

Is using nano silver to treat Ebola misguided?
Aug 16, 2014
(6471) Hits
(0) Comments

“Lucy”: A Movie Review
Aug 18, 2014
(5675) Hits
(0) Comments

High Tech Jainism
Aug 10, 2014
(5260) Hits
(5) Comments



IEET > Security > SpaceThreats > Rights > Economic > Life > Enablement > Innovation > Vision > Futurism > Galactic > Contributors > Gabriel Rothblatt

Print Email permalink (3) Comments (5936) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Spacesteading – May the Meek Inhabit the Cosmos


Gabriel Rothblatt
Gabriel Rothblatt
Ethical Technology

Posted: Jul 15, 2012

I was born with a romance for space, and so I was recently thrilled to read Benjamin Abbot’s argument on settling the future. [1] I too have been bothered by the trends I am seeing in the space industry and the vernacular used in reference to it.

The blockbuster Avatar was a great portrayal of how our past can catch up to our future, but I’m afraid it acted more as an advertisement than a warning of that treacherous scenario.

In the somewhat disappointing scenario that we arrive at an inhabitable yet vacant planet we should not breathe a sigh of relief that our ugly nature will remain in the closet. Colonialism does not rely solely on genocide; servitude and environmental imbalance also flock to its banner. We need not even land on another planet to necessarily re-realize the worst parts of our capabilities. The conditions of our factories and mines today are abysmal; it can be assured that space workers will not fare any better conditions. It often is not the natives but the colonists themselves that cast off the chains to their overlords.

“If innovation can’t be done right - without victims - I’m willing to wait or go without. Here’s to revolution and relationships – not progress.” – Benjamin Abbott

What Benjamin Abbott puts forth - and to which I emotionally agree - is that even for an avid enthusiast of interstellar civilization like myself, the cost of colonialism on a galactic scale is too high for our conscience to pay. I find myself torn between feeling naïve or hypocritical, probably because I am realizing both. Perhaps this is what was meant by:

“The meek shall inherit the Earth—the rest of us will go to the stars” - Robert A. Heinlein

There is a solid and irrefutable point that was raised in regards to our unrestrained appetite for consuming resources by any means necessary. I witnessed this attitude by some, not all, of the attendees at the recent 2012 Conference of the Seasteading Institute [3] and I am confident I’ll see the same at September’s 100 Year Starship Symposium. [4] From their self-advertisement both organizations are courting the business community and selling the prospect of a new frontier in much the same way America was sold to European corporations. Many eager enthusiasts are attempting to engage in the same resource-raping tactics that have gotten us in the ill-gained position we are in now.

In the late 80’s early 90’s, when you could still see the stars at night in DC, I would have sleepovers where we would look up at the sky all night searching for evidence to support our imaginations. At the time we convinced ourselves, and some others, that there was interstellar air traffic coming to port overhead. I had definite plans to be on the 1st manned Mars mission back in 2001, lol. It was saddening to see interest and progress in space go into decline as it has for the past twenty years. In retrospect, taking Benjamin Abbot’s point into consideration, perhaps it was all well-intentioned; we could have been trying to do it right, without victims.

The recent commercializing of the space program has great potential to reignite the public’s hunger for progress in space exploration. Corporations are far more adept at utilizing mass media and marketing to create interest, than government agencies. It seems that with the privatization of space transport underway that trend of decline may become reversed; but then the hesitation may have been a missed opportunity.

Through our desire to flirt with the cosmos, I fear we are creating an unhealthy bedfellow by looking to corporations as our new cosmic sugar daddies. I’m referring to the term Space Colonization in particular and Space Exploration in some degree as well. It is my prediction as we move farther along the path of a commercialized space industry the term Space Exploration will die out in favor of terms like Space Colonization. Beginning with the more minor point about the term Space Exploration, there isn’t much romance with it.

Space is by definition nothing, who in their right mind wants to explore nothingness? Funding revoked. Space Colonization, that sounds quite a bit sexier. It gives off clear images of gluttonous amounts of resources being accumulated from places too far away for laws to be enforced, compounded by epic visions from sci-fi films. The term also implies concrete outcomes, where as exploration implies no necessary benefit other than the thrilling adventures of years in a trillion-rupee tin can.

Words do not appear as definitions to most people, they see visions or conceptions when they hear them. Governments tend to use dry legal vernacular, while corporations appeal to the compulsive emotions of people’s appetitive nature.

When you hear Space Colonization do you see Gerard O’Neill’s High Frontier or Robert Heinlein’s The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?

Like Benjamin Abbott’s appeal, I too caution everyone to examine the historical and ethical implications of our current path to extraterrestrial existence.

With the big news from space being projects of profit corporations I have begun to tremble that our extraterrestrial future will look a lot more like Avatar than Star Trek. That is why I intend to inspire the meek to take to the stars at this year’s 100 Year Starship Symposium.

I have started using the term spacesteading to refer to proposals of life in space. Inspired by Patri Friedman’s Seasteading Institute, which I have long been a de facto Ambassador for, spacesteading represents a less biased conception of what life in space may look like. The term spacesteading is a fresh start or blank slate for us to re-envision how we plan to interact with the galaxy. It also encourages a diversity of applications, which should ensure a wider variety of successful models.

Truthfully, no matter what you call it, the reality on the ground is likely going to become the reality at sea or in space. Even in Star Trek they had to evolve past capitalism to form the United Federation of Planets. I, respectfully, liken Benjamin Abbott’s stance, quoted above, to bumper sticker philosophy. We should wait or do without, if acquisition means placing another in undue stress, unfortunately that in no way translates that we will or can.

Waiting, as we now have seen, just allows others to take the lead. Opting out in objection does nothing to promote a more positive solution. If you want your principles to dictate the future you must make positive efforts to create that reality, further you must be willing to do so by any means necessary. If you aren’t, whoever is willing to will surely make a victim, or slave out of you.

Thank Goddard [4] that we have no life on neighboring planets because the repetition of our colonial past played out on an interplanetary scale is one aspect of science fiction I hope never to be realized.


[1] http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/abbott20120711
[2] http://www.seasteading.org
[3] http://symposium.100yss.org/
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Goddard

Pics attached

Robert Heinlein’s The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gerard Oniell’s The High Frontier
Logo - The United Federation of Planets


Gabriel Rothblatt is an Ambassador for the Seasteading Institute, a member of the Board of Directors for Terasem Movement Incorporated and the Lifeboat Foundations Futurist Board of Advisors. He is currently a US Congressional Candidate in FL-8, the Space Coast of Florida.
Print Email permalink (3) Comments (5937) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Hi Gabriel. I’m pleased to more addition given to this subject. I wasn’t aware of all the specific examples of colonial references in the space scene at the moment.

My position of waiting or going without comes with a specific scenario in mind: the prospect for resource extraction in the context of mass revolutionary mobilization. A number of my anti-capitalist comrades view the maintenance of the global technological system of resource extraction, manufacturing, and exchange as nonnegotiable. I likewise hope and expect to continue various aspects of actually existing industrial capitalism as much as I despite the overall edifice, but insisting on the necessity of mining - for example - as an a priori worries me. I’m not advocating disengagement but rather for individual and community autonomy even when this seems to go against progress. Think direct action for environmental justice instead of running off to live in the wilderness (assuming there’s any left).

Mass revolutionary solidarity prevents victimization and slavery. The trick is getting there.

I’m curious for elaboration what creating the future you want to see by any means necessary means in this context.





I’m not comfortable enough with my understanding of your scenario to prescribe a specific course of action.

I will submit that I am bothered by the lack of aggressive resolve I see amongst the socially conscious. Perhaps I am reflecting on my own naivety in believing that if I didn’t participate in an activity it would go away. I’m not saying it should be the first step, but I do believe to succeed we must be willing to walk on the backs of our opposition.
To garner the strength of the masses you must use tactics that people like us often find distasteful.





I support the term spacesteading over space colonization.  I don’t think the problem is with corporations, as worse things are done by governments than corporations.  The problem is that people have not yet generally got the terasem faith in geoethical technology, and hence tend to not respect the autonomy of other conscious beings.  But, it is making more sense to more people than ever before, so there is good progress.

Pres. Obama is absolutely right on to free spacesteading from government control, as he has by opening up pathways for SpaceX, etc.  Yeah, they have a government contract, but that is less control than the government doing it themself as a monopoly.  In this regard, Pres. Obama has basically given us an Emancipation Proclamation of Spacesteading. 

It is now totally up to us to go for it (YES!), or to bemoan our lot as sharecroppers back at our gravity well of a plantation.

100YSS is an awesome, audacious initiative for spacesteading.  It is not your grandfather’s space program!





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Technology, Love and Connection

Previous entry: Oscar Pistorius makes a ‘One Games’ Future more Likely

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376