Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies


The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Overview of technopolitics


whats new at ieet

Devastated by the American Presidential Election

HISTORIC Victory At Standing Rock

Blockchain – The Building Blocks for a New Society, with Vince Meens

Martine Rothblatt, Lawrence Krauss, Douglas Rushkoff, Russell Blackford endorse Science Missionaries

Trump Picks Establishment Banker For Treasury Secretary

Trump’s Pick for Health Secretary Is Total Nightmare Fuel


ieet books

TECHNOPROG, le transhumanisme au service du progrès social
Author
Marc Roux and Didier Coeurnelle





JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life


IEET > Vision > Psychology > CyborgBuddha > Contributors > Gareth John

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (4347) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Vajrayana Buddhism:  Preparation for the Posthuman?


Gareth John
By Gareth John
Ethical Technology

Posted: Feb 3, 2016

What is it like to be the Buddha? What, for that matter, would it be like to live as a posthuman? In this text I’m going to argue that the two could be symbiotic, mirroring each other in terms of exotic fluidity and personal transformation. In particular, I’m going to focus upon one particular brand of Buddhism - that of Vajrayana, more commonly know as tantra.

Let’s begin by disabusing ourselves of a common misconception: tantra ≠ sexual experimentation. Sure, sex is a method employed in tantra, but then so is eating ice-cream or using the bathroom. Despite lurid ‘journalism’ and Sting, tantra in fact encompasses a vast cornucopia of methods designed to be utilised by the practitioner as best fits their level of awareness and circumstances at the time. Sex may sell, but tantra offers you more bang for your buck if taken seriously.

I’m going to have to present a simplified version of what tantra is, so please bear that in mind before Googling away and retorting that I’ve presented a skewed view of something far more complex. Different traditions each have their own take on how best to practice, so I can only write from what I know from the perspective of how I was taught.

Vajrayana means ‘thunderbolt’ or ‘diamond’ vehicle, with the sense that it is indestructible and electric. This is in contrast, though complements, what Shakyamuni Buddha taught, the vehicle described in the early texts of non-tantric Buddhism. Tantra means something like ‘thread’ or ‘warp and weft’ and refers to the lived experience of our present reality intertwined with the magic of enlightened or awakened experience - in short, the experience of becoming the Buddha.

For reasons of space, I’m going to focus on one aspect of tantric method - that of visualisation. The principle is that tantra is continually performing itself in each and every moment. The trick is to tune in to this vibrant becoming, to be totally identified with outrageous expressions of who we are. One method we can use to accomplish this dramatic transformation is visualisation.

Tantra can be broadly divided into two camps - those of the Outer and Inner Tantras (the ‘Tantras’ actually refer to the texts one uses for one’s practice). The difference between the two is that in the Outer Tantras one visualises the deity outside of oneself; in the Inner Tantras one self-envisions oneself as the deity. Referring to ‘deities’ do not make the mistake of thinking of them as gods or spiritual beings, but rather as expressions of different aspects of our being to demonstrate that all negative and painful states of mind are merely distortions of our primordially awakened state.

In order to engage with tantric practice, one must first have a firm grounding in the vast openness and awareness that lies at the heart of being. This includes preparations such as mindfulness meditation where one gradually learns to remain uninvolved with fleeting thoughts and emotions. Once one has gained some stability in this, one can approach visualisation where these fleeting apparitions we call reality can be realised as the grand dance of existence and non-existence that is our natural state.

Outer Tantras approach visualisation as experiencing the deity outside ourselves, in the space before us. There are literary hundreds of deities that can be utilised for this purpose, but in the tradition in which I was taught one usually begins with Padmasambhava, the tantric Buddha, or Yeshe Tsogyal, his consort and enlightened Buddha in her own right. Using exacting representations of these figures, together with their mantra (the energy of the deity in the form of sound), one begins with ‘creative imagination’ of the Buddha in front of one. Once this becomes as real to the practitioner as the kitchen sink, office, or factory floor, one begins to merge with the deity, represented by visualising rays of light emanating from the deity to oneself.

The Inner Tantras pick up where this merging with the energy of the deity begins to become a reality for the practitioner. Rather than visualising the deity as separate from oneself, one now self-arises as the deity itself.

As someone who had spent three years practicing Zen meditation and thus had some stability in groundlessness, I skipped the Outer Tantras and proceeded to practice the Inner Tantras off the bat. Convention dictates that in order to consolidate this merging of self with the deity’s particular pizzazz, one practises for as long as it takes to internally recite the mantra of the deity one thousand times for each syllable of the mantra. As an example, Padmasambhava’s mantra is twelve syllables long, so you continue in the practice until you have completed 1,200,000 recitations. Yeshe Tsogyal’s mantra is fifteen syllables, so, well, you can do the maths a lot better than I can.

After this initial ‘introduction’ and to the point where one truly feels oneself to be the deity, one branches out into other methods, for example; Medicine Buddha, Wealth Buddha, Purification, Compassion and, yes, joyous representations of sexuality. Each takes the negative energy associated with its position on the existential spectrum of being and transforms it into the awakened form of that energy. Deities can be peaceful, joyous or wrathful, depending on the intensity and type of neurotic emotions being transformed. My personal practice was that of Dorje Trollo - the ‘Crazy Wisdom’ manifestation of Padmasambhava - an incredibly wrathful and tumultuous practice which critics, given my current bipolarism, may say did its job exceptionally well.

To cut a long story short: Vajrayana Buddhism uses powerful visualisation techniques of identifying with the negative energies that we experience as making up our reality and transforming them into enlightened wonderment. Suddenly sorting through the sock drawer is no longer a chore but a divine activity.

So I wonder; might not these personal (and collective) concepts of transformation, bliss, fluidity of being, non-binary gender roles, unlimited power and deep compassion, fleeting and exotic mind-states - using that most precious of commodities, the human mind - offer a precursor to posthuman reality, one that we can utilise right now?

From David Pearce’s Hedonistic Imperative to Natasha Vita-More’s Primo Posthuman, from technoprogressive ideals of technology married with social justice to emotional, intellectual and bodily augmentation, fluidity of personhood and physical expression; could not tantra, in its reimagining of what it means to human, offer us a taste of the Singularity here and now?

Transhumanists talk of us as becoming gods. Might it not be better if we rather thought of ourselves as becoming Buddhas? Imbued with both wisdom and compassion, wouldn’t that lead us into a better future? After all, throughout human history, our gods have not always lived up to ideals such as benevolence and appreciation for humankind. I’d hate to think of a future being peopled by Old Testament-like cyber-organisms, a future defined by petty altercations, ongoing feuds and war.

And what of our AGIs? Might they not wish to rest in vast, unlimited, spaciousness from time to time, arising in glorious and extravagant forms for the sheer play of it? The fancy tickles me, and I’m not sure we would be any the worse for it.

The Buddha essentially said: ‘Be aware, and if you can’t be aware, be kind.’ I believe that strong AIs could possess almost unlimited wisdom given time, but I would like to think that this would be balanced by equally unfettered compassion for all sentient life - the two separate yet inseparable - a magnificent spectrum of limitless and rapturous forms, each according to its purpose.

One without the other could spell disaster for humanity. We want our AGIs to excel in intelligence (that is, after all, what defines them), but I hope, perhaps naively, that there will be a healthy dose of simple kindness that they come to appreciate also, for all our sakes.

AGI as Buddha? Us? Maybe Vajrayana Buddhism can give us a glimpse into the window of what that would feel like?

And what an enchanting future that would be.


Gareth John lives in Mid Wales; he’s an ex-Buddhist priest with a MA in Buddhist Studies at the University of Bristol, and has performed studies on non-monastic traditions of Tibetan tantric Buddhism.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (4348) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Interesting this variation of Buddhism. As for changing being future gods to being future Buddhas is a possible road to sanity and a balanced yet expanded life here and there as in the post Bardo. In an Indian philosophy book I remember reading that some Hindu pundit posited that during reincarnations one can get lucky and end up with the gods. Nice. However this thinker advised the dweller among the gods not to stay in this place too long as the gods will literally suck the life force out of you albeit slowly and with much pleasure so that you actually regress into your next reincarnation. The point when amongst the gods: don’t dally. Sage advice. As this article. My own take on Buddhism -in short- is concentrate on your breath. That’s it. But if visualisation suits you go for it. It is all good





Although I don’t practice formally any more, there’s actually no difference between the two. The point is to find the presence of a awareness in whatever arises - be that the movement of the breath or complex visualisations. It could also be eating, sleeping, taking get a walk… the aim is to uncover the awareness that permeates both the stillness and movement of mind. In Dzogchen terms, one’s natural state. Sometimes relaxing into stillness, or following the breath is appropriate, sometimes visualisation or one of the plethora of tantric practices available. The point always comes back to finding the presence of awareness in whatever arises in mind.

Glad you liked the article - it’s not everybody’s cup of tea.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Book Review: The Misfortunes of the Dead, by George Pitcher

Previous entry: Vigilante of Democracy

HOME | ABOUT | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
35 Harbor Point Blvd, #404, Boston, MA 02125-3242 USA
Email: director @ ieet.org