About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project

Catastrophic Risks Convergence08



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

CALL FOR PAPERS: H+, Cognitive Enhancement and AI

Involved with a bot, sexually or romantically?

Mike Treder shares “bottom up” development strategy in Greece

Zardoz: Ur-Man v. Posthuman Head

Longevity Dividend Through Anti-Aging, Not “Entitlement Reform”

comments

peter hugo mcclure on 'Protopanpsychism and the consciousness conundrum, or why we shouldn't assume uploads' (2008 10 10)

Albasun S.r.l. on 'Enhanced Athletes? It's Only Natural' (2008 10 10)

Steven Earl Salmony on 'What We Could Do With A Trillion Dollars' (2008 10 09)

Scott on 'Cholesterol gene related to both mental acuity and longevity' (2008 10 09)

gene on 'The End of Capitalism?' (2008 10 08)




ieet forums

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)



"This divide, between those who celebrate the transformative power of science and those who fear it, is both broad and profound....one group most fearful of the social change wrought by technology and the other most fearful of the oppressive overreaching of a government bent on controlling those changes....Bioethics should be a field that helps society to evolve, not one that helps it to remain stagnant."
Alta Charo, "Passing on the right: conservative bioethics is closer than it appears," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Summer 2004 v32 i2 p307-8





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Life > Innovation > Enablement > Vision > Bioculture > Fellows > Andy Miah

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Paralympics 2.0


Andy Miah

Andy Miah


Bioethics Forum


Posted: Jun 9, 2008

Oscar Pistorius was right all along, at least for now. He was right to appeal the ruling from the International Association of Athletics Federations that forbade him from competing alongside Olympians in Beijing for one simple reason: he is an Olympian.

(read the complete article at Bioethics Forum)

(conclusion:)

...exposing the injustice of segregation should be our primary moral concern and its significance far exceeds that of ensuring fairness to able-bodied athletes. The question we should be asking is not whether Paralympians should compete at the Olympics, but why they are separate in the first place…

...Some years in the future, this issue will rear its head again when able-bodied athletes become synthetically enhanced to such a degree as to make them, once again, competitive against the hard prosthesis that Pistorius enjoys. We thought the ethics of doping was difficult? It’s all about to get much more complicated. However, there will be one crucial difference between how the world of sport treats this bionic future compared with that of performance-enhancing drugs. I doubt very much that we’ll hear the rhetoric of futuristic “freak shows” and so on when discussing how prosthetic devices change the capacities of people with disabilities. This common, though unreasonable assault on doped athletes has been advanced from various critics of doping practices, including Wildor Hollmann, president of the World Federation of Sports Physicians in 1984 and recently departed World Anti-Doping Agency President Dick Pound (2004).1 I wonder how they will characterize the athletes of this new era of bionic prostheses.
1. J. Hoberman, Testosterone Dreams: Rejuvenation, Aphrodisia, Doping (University of California Press, 2006), p. 192; R. Pound, “An Olympian Test of Our Morality,” Financial Times (London), August 9, 2004, p. 17.


Andy Miah is an IEET Fellow, a Reader in New Media & Bioethics at the University of the West of Scotland, UK. He is author of Genetically Modified Athletes (2004) and is currently working on The Medicalisation of Cyberspace and CyberSport: Digital Games, Ethics & Cultures' (The MIT Press, 2007).

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Thoughts on art and nudity

Previous entry: Beyond Brand Obama

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376