About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Hughes on Catastrophic Risks in the Boston Globe

Goertzel on “OpenCog Prime: Design for an Open-Source Thinking Machine”

The Hate Party

9th World Congress of Bioethics

Emergence - IEET News for Sept 2, 2008

comments

Steven Earl Salmony on 'Making the Visible Invisible' (2008 09 06)

Magne Karlsen on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 06)

Lori on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 05)

Josh on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 09 04)

Will on 'Poll: Who will the next US President be? (Obama)' (2008 09 04)




ieet forums

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (2)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

Jimmy_Adams: Intergenerational Behaviours (1)



"Of all the anti-social vested interests the worst is the vested interest in ill-health."
George Bernard Shaw





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Security > SciTech > Vision > Futurism > Fellows > Jamais Cascio > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


IEET ally CRN releases Nanotechnology Scenario Series


Posted: Dec 11, 2007

IEET Fellow Mike Treder directs the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology which - with the assistance of IEET Fellow Jamais Cascio, who also serves as CRN’s Director of Impacts Analysis - has released eight scenarios for the future development of nanotechnology reflecting a collective scenario process of two dozen people.

The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) today released a series of scenarios depicting various versions of a near-future world into which transformative manufacturing concepts may emerge. Across eight separate storylines, an international team of policy, technology, and economic specialists organized by CRN imagined in detail a range of plausible, challenging events—from pandemics to climate crises to international conflicts—to see how they might affect the development of advanced nanotechnology over the next 15 years.

Future generations of nanotechnology will use sophisticated nanoscale machinery to construct powerful products with molecular precision. Such ‘molecular manufacturing’ could lead to revolutionary capacities, including tabletop fully automated factories capable of constructing duplicate factories in less than a day. Some experts think this may be achieved as early as 2020.

“While a 15-year time frame for the development of desktop nanofactories is arguably optimistic,” said Mike Treder, Executive Director of CRN, “it is by no means outrageous, as recent events indicate [see Notes below]. That’s why we think this scenario series is timely and important.”

All eight scenarios, plus an introduction putting them into context, were posted online today at Nanowerk.com, as well on CRN’s main website, http://www.CRNano.org. The scenarios also will be published in the peer-reviewed print journal, Nanotechnology Perceptions, beginning early next year.

“Although the basic concepts of molecular manufacturing go back as far as 1959,” said Jessica Margolin, CRN’s Director of Research Communities, “it is only in the last few years that technology has advanced to the point where we can begin to see the practical steps that might bring it to fruition. What is still uncertain, however, is precisely how it will emerge.”

It is for that reason that CRN initiated a project early in 2007 to create a series of professional-quality scenarios of a near-future world in which exponential general-purpose molecular manufacturing might be developed and deployed. In pursuing this project, CRN pulled together more than 50 people from six continents, with a range of backgrounds and points of view, as collaborators. Over the course of several months, a unique series of “virtual workshops”—using a combination of teleconferencing, Internet chat, and online shared documents—produced eight intriguing scenarios.

“The scenarios we’ve created examine possible outcomes of different nanotechnology developmental pathways across a variety of nations,” said Jamais Cascio, CRN’s Director of Impacts Analysis. “These scenarios are not predictions, and do not represent outcomes desired by CRN. We intend them to provide a springboard for discussions of molecular manufacturing policies and societal responses.”

The scenario approach offers a tool for the examination of internally consistent possibilities regarding a particular topic as a way to test and reconsider strategies. While each scenario can be understood individually, the real value of the process comes from the comparison of multiple scenarios. A strategic response that appears robust in one scenario may be dangerous in another; an organization, community, or polity using these scenarios to consider how to handle the emergence of molecular manufacturing should strive for responses that are viable across multiple scenarios.

“We’re proud of what we and all our collaborators have accomplished here,” said Treder, “but it’s only a beginning. We hope this project will help to stimulate a thorough investigation of the benefits and risks of nanofactory technology to find what might be done now and in the next few years to mitigate the dangers and increase the likelihood of beneficial outcomes.”

NOTES

Recent events increasing the potential for rapid development of nanofactory technology include:

1.  A study released by the U.S. National Research Council in December 2006 reviewing the theoretical basis of molecular manufacturing and calling for funding of experimental research.

2. A request for issued by DARPA in July 2007 for developing tip-based nanofabrication at the threshold of atomic precision.

3. An announcement of U.K. government in October 2007 to research teams developing nanomachines that can build materials molecule by molecule.

4. The December 2007 publication of a Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems, marking the completion of a broad, years-long, multidisciplinary effort to explore how current laboratory techniques for atomically precise fabrication can be extended, step by step, toward increasingly advanced products and capabilities.

The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (http://www.CRNano.org) has been raising awareness about the severe societal and environmental implications of advanced nanotechnology, and the urgent need for new policy, since 2002. CRN is an affiliate of World Care, an international, non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization. The opinions of CRN do not necessarily represent those of World Care.


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: CRN's Nanotechnology Scenarios Project

Previous entry: The Middleton Family at the New York World's Fair (1939)

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376