Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype

Mining Space

Design Outside the Box

Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?


comments

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 20, 2010)

Dale McCarty on 'Nanotechnology and Cancer Treatment' (Mar 19, 2010)

S on 'No More Libertarians' (Mar 19, 2010)

Tony Bateson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)

bensmyson on 'Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype' (Mar 19, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Life > Fellows > Aubrey de Grey

PrintEmailpermalink • (0) Comments • (35) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




Nigel takes a pop at Aubrey

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

Posted: Jan 10, 2008

In “Preserving Humanity - and Technology?”, Nigel Cameron’s response to Aubrey de Grey’s essay “Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations” by Aubrey D.N.J de Grey.

Unlike Kass and Fukuyama, Nigel finds it hard to argue against healthy life extension. So he tries to drive a wedge between the longevity dividend advocates and H+/SENS-ists:

..perhaps all this agitprop will get the attention of policymakers, so that the implications of emerging technologies can claim the place they deserve in our public attention. I think though it is more likely that transhumans and technophobes will feed on each other, a resonance that will scare off those in the middle - and thereby raise the risk involved not simply in technological investment but in serious public discussion of emerging technologies and their implications.

Nigel also gives Aubrey his favorite epithet for us H+ types: “pugilistic.”

Were I uncharitable I might suggest that de Grey’s worst enemy is not death, but his style, which is pugilistic,

I also received that judgment from Nigel.

Abstract: Aubrey de Grey’s enthusiasm may or may not be infectious, but it is certainly palpable. And it adds a dimension to the discussion the priority that should be given to life-extension/anti-ageing research of which he seems to be unaware. For on the cusp of developments in emerging technologies we find ourselves button-holed by enthusiasts whose ``transhumanist” visions importunately press upon us the most radical understanding of their implications. My suspicion is that the transhumanist mini-insurgency is partly responsible for the general failure of the policy establishment to summon up the courage and vision to address the implications of emerging technologies at all. The insurgents’ effort at ``branding” these technologies as transhumanist (like that of the Raelian flying-saucer cult, a decade ago, to claim cloning as their own) does no favors to the technology. The irony is that de Grey and his fellow-visionaries, far from generating consensus enthusiasm for emerging technology applications, are making them too hot to handle.

 

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: A Gift for Disabled But Active Duty Soldiers

Previous entry: Future Problem Solver Presentations on Neurotechnology

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376