Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.



Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

The Maverick Nanny with a Dopamine Drip: Debunking Fallacies in the Theory of AI Motivation

Chiding CEOs at Walgreens and Other Corporate Defectors

Why We’ll Still Be Fighting About Religious Freedom 200 Years From Now!

Steven Wise of Nonhuman Rights Project on Colbert Report

How do you explain consciousness?

LEV: The Game – Play to Win Indefinite Life


ieet books

Virtually Human: The Promise—-and the Peril—-of Digital Immortality
Author
by Martine Rothblatt


comments

Giulio Prisco on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 25, 2014)

instamatic on 'Should we have a right not to work?' (Jul 24, 2014)

instamatic on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

DrJohnty on 'LEV: The Game – Play to Win Indefinite Life' (Jul 24, 2014)

Taiwanlight on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

Jønathan Lyons on 'The Sad Passing of a Positive Futurist' (Jul 24, 2014)

John Danaher on 'Feminism and the Basic Income (Part Two)' (Jul 24, 2014)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Transhumanism and Marxism: Philosophical Connections

Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Technological Unemployment but Still a Lot of Work…

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Nanomedical Cognitive Enhancement
Jul 11, 2014
(5761) Hits
(0) Comments

Is it possible to build an artificial superintelligence without fully replicating the human brain?
Jun 25, 2014
(5722) Hits
(1) Comments

Interview with Transhumanist Biohacker Rich Lee
Jul 8, 2014
(5532) Hits
(0) Comments

Virtually Sacred, by Robert Geraci – religion in World of Warcraft and Second Life
Jul 3, 2014
(4246) Hits
(0) Comments



IEET > Security > SciTech > Life > Innovation > Vision > Galactic > Contributors > Dick Pelletier

Print Email permalink (2) Comments (16448) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


‘Big Bang’ Theory Wrong?


Dick Pelletier
Dick Pelletier
Ethical Technology

Posted: Mar 3, 2013

The ‘Big Bang’ theory, widely regarded as the leading explanation for the origin of the universe, goes something like this: space and time instantly appeared about 14 billion years ago in a hot, expanding fireball of nearly infinite density.

Scientists dispute ‘Big Bang’ theory

For several decades, scientists have bandied about explanations of how galaxies and stars first formed and why the expansion of the universe is accelerating.   However, so far, nobody has come up with an explanation of what caused the big bang in the first place – at least an explanation that all scientists can agree with.

Now, theoretical physicists Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok, in their fascinating book, “Endless Universe,” dispute the widely-accepted ‘Big Bang’ theory.

Instead, they believe that our cosmos was created by a collision of two universes caused by gravity, possibly in the form of ‘dark matter,’ leaking from one universe into the other; and that the collisions repeat in a never-ending cycle; each time replacing old matter with new galaxies, stars, and planets.

These forward-thinking researchers theorize that what we think of as the moment of creation was simply part of an infinite cycle of titanic collisions between our universe and a parallel world that lies just 10 to 32 meters away from ours.

However, because this parallel universe formed in different dimensions than we’re familiar with, it remains invisible to our sensing technologies.

This radical idea suggests that the Big Bang was not the beginning of time, but merely a bridge to a past filled with endlessly repeating cycles of evolution.

In a related issue, a growing number of scientists now theorize that dark matter might be the gravitational force that drives the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies towards each other.

Some future followers adopt an even more radical thought – the dark matter we sense, may not even be in our universe; it could be located in a parallel cosmos. What’s your opinion?


Dick Pelletier is a weekly columnist who writes about future science and technologies for numerous publications. He's also appeared on various TV shows, and he blogs at Immortaltech.
Print Email permalink (2) Comments (16449) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Interestingly, the predictions that the Higgs Boson will cause the formation of a new universe within our own in a few billion years, one that will then wipe out ours, has had me wondering whether the universe is itself so fundamentally unstable that this sort of thing just happens periodically.





Yes, you are correct. More support for this view can be found here:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/visualscience/2013/02/26/higgs-mass-may-signal-our-universes-explosive-demise/





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: SENS Animated

Previous entry: If the Dalai Lama were Pope

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376