About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project

Catastrophic Risks Convergence08



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

The bumpy ride hits toytown

How the Keating scandal worked

All distant problems are not created equally

Psychiatry and Freedom

Lesbionic Woman, a Technoprogressive Cyborg

comments

Rui Barbosa on 'The End of Capitalism?' (2008 10 06)

gregorylent on 'Technological versus Subjective Acceleration' (2008 10 06)

Alexa on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 10 06)

Cancer Survivor on 'DIY Cancer Therapy: Should dying people be allowed to experiment?' (2008 10 04)

Faucets on 'Hope for human nature' (2008 10 04)




ieet forums

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)



"We are clearly creatures who have long tinkered with ourselves, using all manner of technologies from clothing to telescopes to computers to airplanes. Our view of our 'nature' is closely linked to the technologies that we have invented and to which we have adapted. We are already technological creatures."
Arthur Caplan, bioethicist





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Rights > Neuroethics

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Poll: Should future violent criminals be offered brain-changing therapies?


Posted: Apr 29, 2007

One in five of you were willing to argue for mandatory neuro-rehabilitation for the violent criminal, which is undoubtedly going to be a popular idea in a decade or so. In a sense we already have this, when the criminally insane for involuntarily committed and subjected to treatment. Drug therapies for schizophrenia are not permanent brain modification, as the question here implies, for better or worse. But the legal framework of most countries I know of would certainly support involuntary treatment that permanently fixed psychopathic and violent tendencies.

However three quarters of you opted for giving the inmate a choice. Only five percent opted for the “no brain tweaking” slippery slope position.

New poll: Is searching for signs of intelligent life (SETI) with radio telescopes a waste of time? Seems like a popular topic with both the new extrasolar Earth-like planet and alien defense musings in the news this week. Also I just saw Lily Tomlin perform here in Connecticut. (Her performance also features a crazy bag lady waiting for aliens, in a connection with the previous topic).


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: U.S. Social Security demographers offer woo futurism

Previous entry: Are there aliens out there? Don't bet on it yet.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376