Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Online Games, Super Empowerment, and a Better World

Are You There, Dog? It’s Me, Gordon.

Where Next for the Space Program?

History is Contingent, Built on Flukes, Accidents, and Surprises

Compassion

What Would You Say?

Teaching Theories

Geoengineering: Global Salvation or Ruin?

George Grant and Transhumanism

What’s Wrong With Transhumanism?


comments

Sara on 'Organization and Information at the Bedside (dissertation)' (Mar 18, 2010)

Omar Fink on 'Health Care Good, System Bad' (Mar 18, 2010)

Judith Light Feather on 'What Would You Say?' (Mar 18, 2010)

Matt Brown on 'A Long, Lonely Road' (Mar 18, 2010)

Marshall Barnes on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 17, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Life > Innovation

PrintEmailpermalink • (0) Comments • (20) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




Embracing inevitability of gene tweak risks

Science a GoGo

Posted: Dec 18, 2007

Despite the past horrors of eugenics – which Nietzsche associated with the Übermensch – it’s difficult to seriously argue for genetic engineering research to be scrapped altogether, as it’s this kind of research that is likely to produce treatments for otherwise untreatable diseases and mental illnesses. But there’s undoubtedly a certain amount of risk involved with genetic engineering, either due to unforeseen consequences – such as the contamination of non-GM crops with GM crops – or through deliberate misuse. But the fact remains that if we want to find cures for human ills, extend life, or even change the way that we think, then this will require tampering with fundamental aspects of our genetic composition. Even after animal experiments, nobody can guarantee what the short and long-term fallout from these genetic tinkerings will be among human populations, but do we not proceed because of these unknowns? The risks may be great, but so too are the rewards.

Link


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Prototyping the Participatory Panopticon

Previous entry: We the People - Awesome remix of Chaplin speech

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376