Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    

Support the IEET




The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Via PayPal




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view









Personhood Beyond the Human Conference whats new at ieet
Backing into Eden: Chapters 3, 4, and 5

7 Videos from the Starship Century Symposium Part 2

9 Videos from the Starship Century Symposium Part 1

7 Totally Unexpected Outcomes That Could Follow the Singularity

Environmentalism, Innovation & Economics

Meet the smi2ling New Believers

See-through brains

#OpPrism, #AntiSec, #Anonymous | Anonymous Reacts to NSA

The Temptations of Data vs. The Temptations of Privacy

Scientists explore ways to transform hostility into peaceful thoughts


ieet books

eGods: Faith versus Fantasy in Computer Gaming
Author
by William Sims Bainbridge


comments

billmerit on 'Meet the smi2ling New Believers' (Jun 19, 2013)

Giulio Prisco on 'Meet the smi2ling New Believers' (Jun 19, 2013)

Giulio Prisco on 'Meet the smi2ling New Believers' (Jun 19, 2013)

Giulio Prisco on 'Meet the smi2ling New Believers' (Jun 19, 2013)

SHaGGGz on 'Meet the smi2ling New Believers' (Jun 19, 2013)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

The Hubris of Neo-Luddism
by Franco Cortese
May 26, 2013
(3473) Hits
(12) Comments

End of Eating Food
by Dick Pelletier
May 25, 2013
(2989) Hits
(13) Comments

Abolition is Imperative in Kurzweil’s Sixth Epoch Scenario
by Jønathan Lyons
May 25, 2013
(2430) Hits
(37) Comments

How the Singularity Makes us Dumber
by David Eubanks
May 29, 2013
(2282) Hits
(2) Comments

Call for Papers for Special Issue of JET on “Technological Unemployment and Universal Basic Income”

Jun 4, 2013
(2209) Hits
(0) Comments

The singularity: merging human/machine to achieve immortality
by Dick Pelletier
May 21, 2013
(2106) Hits
(4) Comments



IEET > Security > Biosecurity > Military > Rights > Privacy > Life > Access > Enablement > Health > Vision > Bioculture > Contributors > Piero Scaruffi

Print Email permalink (5) Comments (4994) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


National Rifle Association (NRA) - the Largest Terrorist Organization in the World Strikes Again


piero scaruffi
piero scaruffi
piero scaruffi

Posted: Jun 22, 2012

An armed madman, James Holmes, walked into a movie theater armed with weapons that any Islamic terrorist would love to have and killed 12 people. The difference between this madman and an Islamic terrorist is simple: this madman lives in a country in which it is legal to own a gun, and in fact it is encouraged.

The largest terrorist organization in the world, the National Rifle Association (NRA), is perfectly legal. In fact, it is protected by most of Congress (well, most of Congress is routinely bribed by this organization in one form or another).

While we witness the atrocities committed by the Syrian regime against its people, one wonders why the atrocities committed by the gun lobby in the USA do not qualify as such. A dead person is a dead person, and it makes little difference whether s/he was killed while raising the Syrian flag or watching a movie in a theater.

In fact, it sounds to me like a mass killing in a movie theater is more abominable than a mass killing in a civil war. In a sense, we devalue the lives of these 12 innocents when we consider “terrorism” the attack in Bulgaria that killed five Israeli tourists (and pledge revenge on the group that sponsored them) and neither consider “terrorism” the cold-blooded attack in a movie theater nor pursue and punish its sponsors. It takes a few minutes to find out the names of all the politicians who vote according to the wishes of the NRA, and even less to find out the address of the NRA, the names of its leaders, and the names of all its members.


Every time there is a mass shooting the politicians pretend that they will do something about guns. Following the january 2011 shooting that left a politician, Gabrielle Giffords, severely wounded and six dead in Arizona, the parties bickered briefly on how to enforce gun laws, but time took its toll: eventually the media went on to talk about other issues and absolutely no law was passed by Washington.

The 12 killed in the Colorado movie theater are the victims of that inaction.

And just to be as politically incorrect as possible, please note that the mass killer, James Holmes, is, yet again, a male white Anglosaxon Protestant (a male WASP). A few days later Iraq was rocked by a wave of suicide bombings and random killings, but those can be attributed to political and sectarian design of one kind or another. The Islamic world has suicide bombers, the USA has male WASPs who go berserk and need to kill as many random strangers as possible. And guess what: the typical member of the NRA is a male WASP.

For more information, see also these three other articles I’ve written: Defend the USA Against Terrorists, and The largest terrorist organization in the world kills 32 people in the USA and how the gun lobby de facto fuels the Mexican Civil War.

 


piero scaruffi is an author, cultural historian and blogger who has written extensively about a wealth of topics, ranging from cognitive science to music.
Print Email permalink (5) Comments (4995) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg submit to Twitter


COMMENTS


This article strikes me as a festering piece of totalitarian goo.
If you want to regard the Aurora tragedy as terrorism, it is terrorism made possible by government; the City of Aurora has strict gun control laws.

I am AMAZED the author has the chutzpah to mention Syria. If the people of Syria were well-armed, I do not doubt that their government would have a much more difficult time slaughtering them at will.

Apparently Mr. Scaruffi only wants tyrants and government-approved murderers to have guns; the right to self-defense and the right to collective self-defense against tyranny, as well as the right to bear arms acknowledged by the United States Constitution,  appear to be entirely unknown to him.





I’m sorry, but this is riddled with poor logic.

To start with; the premise that access to firearms is a causation or encouragement for violent crime is simply false. There are far more significant psychological and socioeconomic causes behind violence than having access to firearms. While many developed countries have homicide rates at about half of what the US has, the US sits around 4.8 homicides per 100k people (most developed nations are under 2.5). While any number of homicides is unacceptable, the number of stressors in the US is unparallelled in most of the developed world (with the possible exception of Israel and a few others). The US has a enormously more diverse geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic distributions compared to most developed nations. All of these factors clash between cultures, communities, and classes, which often leads to violent crime. These are considerably more potent forces than having access to one of many types of deadly weapons.

That said, firearms do present a significant amount of killing power, but the determined criminal can cause just as much, if not more damage with household products. It’s far easier to buy the components of a pipe bomb laced with nails than it is to buy a gun. Realizing this, it’s a slippery slope over many other kinds of potential weapons. Building supplies and tools, vehicles, farming supplies, and fuel are all perfectly legal, necessary, and deadly. That does not mean that the poor fellow who works at my local Home Depot is aiding terrorists intentionally, nor should they be labeled as a terrorist sympathizer. This kind of thinking, even applied to an organization as powerful and potentially dangerous as the NRA is simply foolish.

Furthermore, the fact of the matter is that, to my knowledge, no person can be blamed for inaction in the events that lead up to the shooting in Aurora. James Holmes appears to have acted entirely outside any social group (possibly including his family, as we have yet to discover many details), and his actions viewed in the perspective of the time were not cause for red flags. The only person to blame for the twelve deaths in Aurora is James Holmes. As such, outlawing or further regulating firearms would not have fixed any psychological problems that James Holmes may have.





The “poor logic” is the insane belief that these massacres would still occur with the frequency, ease and scale if was simply more difficult to acquire weapons specifically designed to kill many humans in combat. A single shot rifle will cause less damage in the sense of the volume of casualties. It’s very simple, and not opinion, it is mathematical and physical fact. A person armed with a butter knife and a musket will be more easily overwhelmed, or escaped from, than a person armed with rapid fire, large volume capacity, high powered weapons. Also, why on Earth, does a member of the general public require such military grade weapons, or smoke and stun grenades??? More needs to be done about mental illness, that is certain, however, best take the keys from an upset, inebriated driver, than let them continue to drive, or in this case, best take the military weapons away. Does a responsible parent allow their children to run with knives or scissors? It is all a call for harm minimisation. Can we stop the reasons why people hurt others? Not presently. But we certainly have the power to, and responsibility, to limit the damage they can cause and the ease with which they can.





Access to cutlery is a causation of eating. Access to porcelain is a causation of relieving oneself. Access to guns is a causation of violence.
If it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
It’s logic.
Take away the guns. Take away the violence.
Leave the guns in. Leave the violence in.
Your call.





Actually, further gun control laws might be construed as collective punishment, which the UN tends to frown upon.

We have about as many firearms as we have citizens here, and the average collection consists of about 3.5 weapons - exactly as many as Holmes used.  (3 they’re sure of, and one they aren’t - I’m weighting that as 0.5 of a gun).

Also, the favored weapon of criminals is the .38 Special snubnose revolver.  The favored self/home defense weapon of the law-abiding, “good guy” gun owner?  You probably guessed it - the .38 Special snubnose revolver.

The NRA’s position on violent crime is fairly effective on old fashioned crime such as strongarm robbery and rape - inthe 1960s, Florida ended a staggering epidemic of strongarm rape in one year by allowing anyone interested, sane, and not criminal to carry a gun.  They literally went from setting records for “most rape” one year to zero the next.  It does *not* work so well against would-be mass murderers.

There’s good, evidence-based criminology studies suggesting that “resist with a gun” is five times safer than “Give the mugger your wallet, and comply with every request”, so I’ve been forced to change my views; I’d suggest to Piero that while Gunfacts.Info is a biased source, the primary sources they cite are surprisingly rigorous studies published in academic journals of good repute.





YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Eugenics 2.0: Prometheus, Power & The Procreation Delusion (Part 2)

Previous entry: IEET Readers Lean a Little to the Left

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 119, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376