Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

Is Effective Regulation of AI Possible? Eight Potential Regulatory Problems

Buddhism vs. Utilitarianism - two paths that seek to abolish suffering

The “God Helmet” Can Give You Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences

Here’s What Brian Greene’s Gut is Telling Him About Intelligent Life in the Universe

Robosapiens – merging with machines will improve humanity at an exponential rate

The why and how of effective altruism


ieet books

The Future of Business
Author
Ed. Rohit Talwar


comments

dobermanmac on 'Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now' (Jul 6, 2015)

rmk948 on 'Condoms are So Hundred Years Ago: Why Better Birth Control for Men Would Be Better for Everyone' (Jul 5, 2015)

Vinayagamoorthy on 'Practopoiesis: How Cybernetics of Biology can Help AI' (Jul 5, 2015)

vanillahaze on 'Condoms are So Hundred Years Ago: Why Better Birth Control for Men Would Be Better for Everyone' (Jul 4, 2015)

Valkyrie Ice on 'Longevity will lead to Overpopulation - we need to consider our options now' (Jul 4, 2015)

spud100 on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)

Alexey Turchin on 'How to Survive the End of the Universe' (Jul 3, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


Universal Basic Income—The Foundation of a Technically Advanced Society
Jun 15, 2015
(48385) Hits
(6) Comments

Should Politicians be Replaced by Artificial Intelligence? Interview with Mark Waser
Jun 12, 2015
(19483) Hits
(3) Comments

Will Artificial Intelligence be a Buddha? Is Fear of AI just a symptom of Human Self-Loathing?
Jun 17, 2015
(11342) Hits
(5) Comments

Split the Earth: 50% for Humans, 50% for Protected Biodiversity Zones
Jun 21, 2015
(10606) Hits
(1) Comments



IEET > Security > Rights > Neuroethics > Life > Access > Enablement > Contributors > Piero Scaruffi

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (5969) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Rules Save Lives but do not Save Brains


piero scaruffi
By piero scaruffi
Ethical Technology

Posted: Mar 15, 2013

Ultimately, the most structured society will be a society in which every action has to comply with some rules, i.e. its citizens will de facto be robots with no brains. Why does brain/mind want to get rid of brain/mind?

  • Every animal tries to create some order around its natural environment
  • Likewise the history of human civilization is largely the attemp to control nature and structure life
  • Human societies are environments in which the chaos of nature is greatly reduced
  • This allows for humans to predict the future and therefore minimize threats to their survival
  • One chaotic component of nature is humans themselves, the interaction among them.
  • Societies invent rules and regulations to order and structure the interaction among humans. Therefore we have rules on how to dress, eat, drive, etc. There are rules on how to shop in a supermarket and how to eat in a restaurant.
  • Language itself is based on rules
  • The process of turning children into adults is largely a process of forcing them to obey rules, from "good manners" to language itself.
  • We tend to call "civilized" a society that has many rules and "uncivilized" a society that has no rules.
  • Rules have to be encorced by states and police officers. The more rules the more state we need to "protect" citizens from those who break the rules. States themselves are an outcome of this process towards structuring life.
  • Humans raised in a society with many rules (a highly structured society) have trouble (and probably panic) when dropped in a society with fewer rules (an unstructured society)
  • Rules help make society stable and predictable, i.e. safe and efficient. Each rule makes it easy for people to do what they do with their lives. For example, there are now so many rules about driving a car (and about building a car) that accidents have been greatly reduced.


     
  • However, rules also restrict what people can think of doing. For example, people have become much less skilled at driving: they don't need to be skilled drivers.
  • The more structured your society is, the less often you need to use your brain. When we install a traffic light in front of a school, we are creating a safer and more efficient environment for children. The price to pay is that those children won't need to use their brain to cross the street.
  • The safest society is one in which what is not forbidden is mandatory. That society is the one that requires the least cognitive effort and provides the highest degree of safety.
  • Ultimately, the most structured society will be a society in which every action has to comply with some rules, i.e. its citizens will de facto be robots with no brains.
  • The choice is between living in a highly strucutred society in which life is safe and efficient but your brain is irrelevant (and actually dangerous) and an unstructered society in which life is unsafe and inefficient but your brain is very valuable (and actually indispensable to survive)
  • Civilization seems a process to remove the brain from the decision process, to turn life into a simple sequence of rules that must be obeyed.
  • Those rules are, of course, designed by brains. Therefore the ultimate function of brains within a society of brains seem to make sure that brains don't run the society, i.e. to commit a sort of suicide.

piero scaruffi is an author, cultural historian and blogger who has written extensively about a wealth of topics, ranging from cognitive science to music.
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (5970) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Robots: Giving rights to robots

Previous entry: Beyond Humanism: Becoming Cyborgs through Posthumanism by Gavin Rae - Pt1

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376