Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Where Next for the Space Program?

History is Contingent, Built on Flukes, Accidents, and Surprises

Compassion

What Would You Say?

Teaching Theories

Geoengineering: Global Salvation or Ruin?

George Grant and Transhumanism

What’s Wrong With Transhumanism?

Welcome to 2030

Natasha Vita-More @ SXSW 2010


comments

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 17, 2010)

Tom Huffman on 'The Uncertain Future of Transhumanism' (Mar 17, 2010)

postfuturist on 'IEET Readers See China as Future Power' (Mar 17, 2010)

veronica on 'Compassion' (Mar 17, 2010)

iPan Ba'al Typhon on 'Compassion' (Mar 17, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Security > SciTech > Rights > Privacy > Life > Innovation > Implants > Health > Vision > Futurism > Interns > Kristi Scott

PrintEmailpermalink • (3) Comments • (36) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




How do the kids know, and what do we say?


Kristi Scott
Kristi Scott
Care to Elaborate

Posted: Nov 9, 2009

As adults we talk about emerging technologies, but I wonder how much we factor in kids and their futures in our discussions.

I’m curious to hear how the knowledge you gain from this site and others regarding emerging technologies translates to your kids. If you don’t have children, have you thought about them in relation to the larger topics? I’m not talking about designer babies. I’m talking about things like life-casting, global catastrophic risks, and human enhancement to name just three that popped in to my mind.



With life-casting, I’ve looked at the articles, very interesting stuff. I’ve been wrestling with my opinions about it and whether or not I think I could do it or not. Then suddenly it hit me.

If this takes off and people in society at large adopt it, when exactly do we want those memories we are recording to start? I could have missed this discussion and if I did, please send it to me, but how would it be to have kids life-casting? What are the ethics involved in this? Not to mention what was life like as a child that I would want to see again. Nostalgically it would be great to have documented my life and be able to go back and see my mother young and illness free. However, there is that whole awkward grade school and high school phase. My last name was Winternheimer, so there was a bit of name calling.

Aside from the awkward childhood moments, how young would we, as a society, be willing to go? Would there be a legal age and if so when? What about implanting a recording device in utero? It would be very cool to see that experience and then on up through life wouldn’t it? But just because we can, should we? I don’t have the answers yet myself.

So let’s move to global catastrophic risks, a topic that deals, in my opinion, with educational issues. Are we talking about these types of scenarios and plans with the next generations? Or, better phrased, are we talking to them about science, math, and applying critical thought to future scenarios so they can weigh in the options of what just might come about and how we can help out our fellow man?

Finally, human enhancement, a topic kids probably have heard more about even if they don’t directly know they have. So, what do they know? Is it worth a discussion with them? I think so. I think there is value in talking with them about grandma’s heart that is a machine and not the one she was born with.

For example, when the time came when my mom was ill, I talked with my son about science and technology. We talked about what helped keep her alive and with us much longer than she might have been. When we heard President Obama speak about science and technology in regards to medicine, my son knew what that meant for people out there. Is it using the terminology of enhancement that makes people step back? There are many different types of enhancement, so where are we in society when it comes to the discussions with kids?

The point I’m trying to make is that there are lot of questions to be asked and it seems that the discussion is an important one to have. It would be nice to see a next generation that is able to understand the technologies that are discussed, but to also be critics and skeptics as necessary.


Kristi Scott is a Master of Liberal Studies student and an Institutional Research Associate for Assessment at the University of Southern Indiana in Evansville, IN. Her focus is on advertising, mass communication, and society, with a special interest in transhumanism, popular culture, and science. Kristi is a freelance writer for Evansville Living magazine. She also is a member of the Women’s Bioethics Project and the Junior League of Evansville.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


These are good questions. It's always a good idea to consider the kids. I agree, they are the future. Would they want to live forever? I don't know. Would they want a singularity? I don't know. What kind of world do they want? This could be an interesting field of research.

Not to long ago I encouraged my nephew to get on board with creating a ning social network for kids who want to discuss the future. I'm sure there is already something out there like that.

First, lets talk about life-casting.

Kids probably shouldn't be life-casting. I know that as adults it would be great to see certain moments of childhood, but those can be captured by the child with a web camera, or other small recording devices. They probably shouldn't be uploading any footage of themselves to be viewed by the public. For numerous reasons. Safety, being the top concern.

Certainly it's a delicate issue, considering that we don't know what the psychological effects could be. Might the child become an extreme narcissist, or a complete megalomaniac? More than likely the child might end up developing some serious social anxiety. It's not easy knowing for sure what could happen, but it's even difficult for me to imagine my life as becoming an open book.

It is probably best to keep a child from life-casting. Although, they should be taught how to handle small media devices, write a journal, and reflect on the life-casting of adults (be it in media or autobiography), in order to gain their own personal insight.

What about global disaster prevention?

Not something I think we'd see in any elementary school.

Disaster preparedness should be taught to children, yes, but at a practical level. When it comes to global catastrophic risks it is probably best to just expose them when they are old enough to watch a movie, like Armageddon or 2012. Which, I think are both PG13.

Realistically, at that age 13 they could be taught to reflect on problems and solutions. Of course explaining resolutions might be difficult if they don't have some serious physics and engineering skills, but engaging their imaginations, nevertheless, is a good idea. The best possible conversation would be one that gets them thinking about how they can be heroes, rather than victims.

Finally, the topic of "human enhancement".

Here's an idea. I think that they could first be asked to make a list of different characters in media that have been enhanced, (like superheroes, cyborgs, video game characters, etc.) and ask secondly they could decide what powers they think would be the best for all mankind. It might be a fun discussion. Eventually, you'd probably have to bring it back to reality and let them know of various technologies that exist right now. In particular the ones that simply manage to keep people alive.

It might also be a good idea to see what they think of controlling emotional states, and considering the merits of anger, hate, and other negative emotions, over and against the more positive emotions. As always, respecting kids answers and encouraging them to keep thinking about these issues might actually produce some answers to some of our most challenging ethical dilemmas. Again, I think that emphasizing the practical over the magical is a good first step to teaching them about human enhancement.

This is an interesting discussion. What other topics do you think kids might/might not be able to deal with? Have you considered making a documentary?



“I agree, they are the future. Would they want to live forever? I don't know. Would they want a singularity? I don't know. What kind of world do they want? This could be an interesting field of research. “

Yes, it would be an interesting field of research. I wonder though if past kids were asked or thought to be prepared for the responsibilities of the technologies created in their time. So a historical research component also potentially exists. Does it make any difference if you ask kids? I got in to a discussion on Facebook with Shannon Vyff, author of 21st Century Kids, who has taught technology to children. She was kind enough to send me some photos she used and I promptly showed them to my son. My son promptly responded, “what happens if something goes wrong with it and it’s inside the person?” (It was a picture of a nanobot in the blood stream)

I will check in to the Ning site to see if it’s something my son might be able to join. However, there also lies a problem. School adoption of the Internet and taking advantage of kids eagerness and willingness to explore online and use it as an educational tool.

I appreciate that you use film as an example for global catastrophic risks and human enhancement. There is also another film that was brought to my attention that might have some overlap with life-casting, but I need to see it myself to be sure. Some may not share my sentiments, but I see film as a way to talk with people about bigger concepts and ideas in a medium they can understand and are not intimidated by. This is something I will be talking about next month actually at the Biopolitics in Pop Culture Seminar and h+ Summit.

“This is an interesting discussion. What other topics do you think kids might/might not be able to deal with? Have you considered making a documentary?”

Thank you. As far as other topics, there is nano-technology, cognitive enhancements, artificial intelligence and virtual reality. Mainly in regards to preparedness and understanding of what’s going on. Actually, bring this up as a concern for kids makes me think adults too in this arena. Mention nano-tech in products at a dinner discussion and it brings up a lot of weird looks. It’s as much an understanding for the future as it is today. And virtual reality, that is a topic I’ve been wrestling with and do not have a real short answer to put right now. Artificial Intelligence is a broad one for discussion with children and I’m formulating that right now also into words for a future blog.

As far as the documentary is concerned, personally I haven’t thought of it, no. You mentioning it got my brain working on ideas and people to contact though. That would be interesting to see and document. I’ll put it down as a potential future project. Thanks.
Kristi



Is that an artificial heart? I think the discussion can be the best way to educate your kids. Since we are now entering our technological era, kids are more open in science discussions.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Imagine No Religion

Previous entry: Avatar Trailer

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376