IEET LIFE RIGHTS SECURITY VISION TITLE=
AboutProgramsEventsPublicationsForumsBlogContactSupport         Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


New at IEET


Dr. Pinker Lays the Smackdown on Leon Kass

Is life a gift?

Cobra Commander in ‘08: The Transhuman Choice

Welcome to Intern Akansha Bhargava

Pondering Fermi

Recent Comments


PhotoFan on 'Longevity Dividend Seminar Talks' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'And the Disabled Shall Inherit the Earth' (2008 05 14)


scooter on 'Organization and Information at the Bedside (dissertation)' (2008 05 14)


zentinal on 'Cobra Commander in '08: The Transhuman Choice' (2008 05 13)


James D on 'The Future of Sex' (2008 05 12)


IEET Fora


Thoughtsurfer: Trans movies poll (1)



"The human condition can be changed, and it will be changed, and is changing; the only real questions are how, and to what end."
Bruce Sterling, Cyberpunk in the 90's



TechEthics News


Snarky Compliments from Will Saletan

Cognitive Enhancement by Scientists

Annalee on PostGenderism

Transhuman, the comic

H+/Biocon/Technoprogressive Quiz at SAGE Crossroads





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Security > Cyber > Military

permalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Rules for Soldier-Bots


Posted: Feb 2, 2008

Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture (2MB PDF)

Ronald C. Arkin - Mobile Robot Laboratory, Georgia Institute of Technology

Abstract This article provides the basis, motivation, theory, and design recommendations for the implementation of an ethical control and reasoning system potentially suitable for constraining lethal actions in an autonomous robotic system so that they fall within the bounds prescribed by the Laws of War and Rules of Engagement. It is based upon extensions to existing deliberative/reactive autonomous robotic architectures, and includes recommendations for (1) post facto suppression of unethical behavior, (2) behavioral design that incorporates ethical constraints from the onset, (3) the use of affective functions as an adaptive component in the event of unethical action, and (4) a mechanism in support of identifying and advising operators regarding the ultimate responsibility for the deployment of such a system.


permalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Latest from JET

Previous entry: No Singing Allowed: Assumptions and Other Nonsense

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376