Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.

Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:

Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

The one percent discovers transhumanism: Davos 2016

The wonderful and terrifying implications of computers that can learn

“McMindfulness”: is Buddhism contaminated by capitalism?” - interview with Terry Hyland

Stefan Sorgner co-organizing 8th Beyond Humanism Conference in Madrid

The Value of Deep Work and How to Prioritise It

Should you be able to patent a human gene?

ieet books

Keywords for Environmental Studies
eds. Joni Adamson, William A. Gleason, David N. Pellow


RJP8915 on 'Ray Kurzweil’s Basic Ideas' (Feb 6, 2016)

spud100 on 'Is Cheap Oil a Bad Thing?' (Feb 6, 2016)

John G Mess on 'Ray Kurzweil’s Basic Ideas' (Feb 6, 2016)

RJP8915 on 'Ray Kurzweil’s Basic Ideas' (Feb 6, 2016)

Barbara546 on 'My Gay Marriage in USA Prediction was Incredibly Wrong, by 20 Years - Hooray!' (Feb 6, 2016)

g3reth on '"McMindfulness": is Buddhism contaminated by capitalism?" - interview with Terry Hyland' (Feb 6, 2016)

almostvoid on 'The Value of Deep Work and How to Prioritise It' (Feb 6, 2016)

Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List


Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month

“Technology Could Bring Heaven on Earth, or Create Hell” - interview with futurist Gerd Leonhard
Jan 9, 2016
(9111) Hits
(1) Comments

Becoming the First Transhuman: A Call For The Right Stuff
Jan 17, 2016
(7149) Hits
(2) Comments

First Successful Gene-Editing in Live Mammals Brings Us Closer to Human Treatments
Jan 22, 2016
(4815) Hits
(0) Comments

The Singularity: Fact or Fiction or Somewhere In-between?
Jan 13, 2016
(4382) Hits
(17) Comments

IEET > Rights > Disability > Neuroethics > Life > Access > Enablement > Innovation > Implants > Health > Vision > Bioculture > Futurism > Technoprogressivism > Affiliate Scholar > Ilia Stambler

Print Email permalink (0) Comments (9725) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg

The Longevity Party - Who Needs it?  Who Wants it?

Ilia Stambler
By Ilia Stambler
Ethical Technology

Posted: Aug 23, 2012

A few weeks ago, there began organizing efforts to create longevity parties in several parts of the world – in Russia, the US, Israel and Europe – dedicated to political promotion of life-extension research and practice.

(see Here, Here and Here.)

Some questions may immediately arise with regard to these efforts.

Some people, who have not dedicated too long to the study of life-extension or their mortality or politics, may even ask: What loons would start such a party and what loons would vote for it?

But at least we, the “loons” who are involved in these activities, should know why we are doing this. We are doing this to attempt to extend our own lives and the lives of our loved ones by perhaps one of the very few means available to us – by attempting to influence public health policy and research policy. This can be a powerful, actionable and democratic means, and somebody has to try to wield it. And if the desire to introduce political innovations for the public good is the prerogative of loons, then all laws and all reforms were produced by loons and we are in a good company. If this realization increases our motivation, that would be good news.

Perhaps even better news would be to know that there might actually be people who would vote for such a party, or any other party willing to embroider “longevity” on its banner. Very recently there appeared indications that there might indeed be such people. A recent survey funded by Terasem Movement Inc. showed that about 76% of transhumanists “want immortality.”

But perhaps an even more surprising finding is that not a negligible proportion of “normal people” want immortality. A poll is currently being conducted by the CBC News network on this issue. The question is “If you had the opportunity to live forever - albeit cybernetically - would you do it?” The poll started on July 31 and is still open. As of today, August 16, about 42,000 people responded. About 35.5% said “Yes, at any and all cost” and 17% more said “Yes, but only if I could afford it comfortably.” Thus, about 52.5% of responders were in favor of immortality! (see Here)

About 17% “don’t want to live forever” (ok). About 9% “don’t believe that this technology will ever exist” (which implies that 91% believe it can exist). About 12.5% were “terrified” by the idea, and about 9% were not sure or other.

Note that the poll was created in relation to the “Strategic Social Initiative Russia2045” aimed to achieve cybernetic immortality via creating artificial avatars for human consciousness. (Very recently “Russia2045” was renamed to just “2045” and now includes over 14,000 members.

One can counter that people who participated in that poll were already interested in immortality, insofar as they read the article in which the poll is embedded.

But there are also some rigorous surveys that indicate that the interest in immortality (a.k.a. radical life extension) in the general public might be quite considerable.

Thus in January this year, the aspirations for immortality were estimated in Russia by the analytical “Levada Center.” The poll was conducted for the “Russia2045” Initiative, before the international congress “Global Future 2045” held in Moscow in February (

The poll included 1600 responders, over 18 years old, from 45 regions of Russia, both city and country, with a standard deviation of 0.035.

According to this poll, 32% of Russian citizens wanted radical life extension for themselves, while “keeping youth and good health”: 23% wanted to live “several times longer than people live now,” 9% wanted to live “unlimitedly long, as I wish, up to immortality,” 64% wanted to live “as long as allotted by nature now,” and 4% had difficulty answering.

Interestingly, 44% wanted radical life extension for their close ones, that is, more than for themselves: 29% wished their loved ones to live “several times longer” and 15% wished them to live “unlimitedly long, as they wish, up to immortality.” This finding dispels the fears that the pursuit of radical life extension is inherently selfish.

Moreover, according to this poll, 45% of Russian citizens “would support a public association for radical life extension.” (

One can suspect that if such a survey were conducted elsewhere, the results may not be very different.

A possible general conclusion may be that a large proportion of people want radical life extension and are not afraid to admit it. Moreover a growing number of people are ready to work toward this purpose, to whatever limited degree they can. In such a situation, political advocacy for life-extension can flourish.

Ilia Stambler is an IEET Affiliate Scholar. He completed his PhD degree at the Department of Science, Technology and Society, Bar-Ilan University. His thesis subject, and his main interest, is the History of Life-extensionism in the 20th Century.”
Print Email permalink (0) Comments (9726) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Billionaire Peter Thiel Invests in the Development of 3D Printed Meat

Previous entry: Three Ways Julian Assange can Escape England


RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

East Coast Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @     phone: 860-428-1837

West Coast Contact: Managing Director, Hank Pellissier
425 Moraga Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611
Email: hank @