About | Programs | Events | Publications | Forums | Blog | Contact | Support   
     Login      Register    


Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Hughes on Catastrophic Risks in the Boston Globe

Goertzel on “OpenCog Prime: Design for an Open-Source Thinking Machine”

The Hate Party

9th World Congress of Bioethics

Emergence - IEET News for Sept 2, 2008

comments

Steven Earl Salmony on 'Making the Visible Invisible' (2008 09 06)

Magne Karlsen on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 06)

Lori on 'The Hate Party' (2008 09 05)

Josh on 'Sorry ladies, the male birth control pill is not about you' (2008 09 04)

Will on 'Poll: Who will the next US President be? (Obama)' (2008 09 04)




ieet forums

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (2)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

Jimmy_Adams: Intergenerational Behaviours (1)



"Professor Goddard does not know the relation between action and reaction and the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react. He seems to lack the basic knowledge ladled out daily in high schools." -- 1921 New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work.





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Rights > FreeThought > Vision > CyborgBuddha > J. Hughes

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Hughes Talk on H+ & Religion top-rated at Thoughtware.tv


Posted: Apr 16, 2008

To toot my own horn, one of my favorite talks in recent memory was one I gave to the Templeton folks on the compatibility of religion and transhumanism. Andres put it up on Thoughtware.tv, and he wrote to let me know that it has been their top-rated talk there.  Listen to it here.  The slides associated with that talk are here, and the paper is here.


PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


James, I really enjoyed this recording -- even better than the paper or my memory of its presentation in Second Life, although I enjoyed them, too. Your sense of humor adds a lot. By the way, your presentation of Mormon eschatological beliefs sounds crazy to me, too. wink



This kind of thing worries me. Whilst I have no problem with moderate religionists (and indeed regularly attend Buddhist meditation sessions), it seems that a lot of people are actively looking for arguments as to why advanced technology, accelerating change and the possibilities that they open up support their particular religious beliefs. "Oh, look, a piece of advanced technology. How can I find an argument to make that support my existing religious belief?" If you have already decided what you want to argue in favor of, i.e. if you have already written the bottom line, then you are wasting your time rationalizing it. Whilst I support peoples' right to their own opinions, I must note that in my opinion, being religious is not compatible with being rational, and being rational is something that transhumanists ought to value above all else.



Roko, few (if any) religious persons identify with your characterization of religious persons, which should be recognized as a critical weakness in your perspective.



You should write a book on this James. I would like to clarify that it was Arlind, a community member, that contributed this on Thoughtware.TV and lastly that Kurzweil dated the singularity for 2045, rather than 2029 as it is stated. This is definitely one of my favorite talks, I look forward to seeing much more at Thoughtware.TV - Andres



Lincoln, your "reason" is as solid as any religious argument. Roko is not the one with critical weakness here...



Armin, so far as I know, you know little about my reasons for any idea, religious or otherwise. If I'm incorrect, I welcome from you evidence that you know something about my reasons and their weaknesses. Appeals to anti-religious sentiment, if evidence for anything at all, are only evidence of weaknesses in your reasoning.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Roll +3 vs the Future

Previous entry: Russell's new book project, Voices of Disbelief

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376